Bari Abdellatif, a resident of al-Bab who also has fled to Turkey, said friction between Chechen and Uzbek militants recently led to clashes between the two that ended only with the intervention of Omar al-Shishani, a prominent Chechen IS commander. At least two senior figures were killed because of the internal strife, he said.
Why? How about a decade of randomly dropping bombs all over the Middle East.
I don't get all this hand-wringing over beheadings or burnings.
What exactly do you think happens when you drop a 2000lb bomb filled with napalm?
... it can't purely be about the west, or for that matter the contents of the quran the way the breivikites would have us believe...
I don't get all this hand-wringing over beheadings or burnings.
What exactly do you think happens when you drop a 2000lb bomb filled with napalm?
He hasn't been in the Middle East for the last decade though, he's mostly been in London, where he's from. That's the question that's been asked: why has he chosen to commit his life to this cause thousands of miles away to which there are surely thousands, if not hundreds of thousands or millions of others who are more directly connected to it, and have lost more personally as a result of the last 14 years of war from Afghanistan onwards. What has motivated young British/French/other European Muslim men to literally go and fight, kill and be killed for ISIS?
ISIS offer a narrative. It includes drama, danger, and most importantly meaning.
Western late-capitalist society on the other hand, even to those not seriously affected by young people's shitty employment prospects, racism and Islamophobia, merely offers entertainment.
ah the sort of cloying smug one man up man ship that does the debate the world of good. you sound like the biggest hand ringer of them all.
give me "western late-capitalism" any day of the week, ta.
edited - a bit harsh.
but you get my drift. it it's really bad for these people here, please don't let them back into the UK, they will be happier elsewhere, surely>?
i can't disagree with any of that.It's not about happiness, though - that's seeing it through our lens.
Happiness has been diluted to comfort and diversion in our culture because it sells product. What ISIS are offering isn't comfort, it's a chance to play a part in a struggle, in a grand, epic narrative between absolute good and absolute evil.
It's about making a choice to do something that 'makes sense' at a deep psychological level in a way that nothing can in our society, for a whole heap of complicated reasons.
There are other reasons that people go too, of course.
i can't disagree with any of that.
i do not hold my society in contempt because of that lack of meaning, though. meaning can be created where ever you live. i create my own meaning in life, for example.
I feel the same way. However, for those who feel that their sense of meaning needs to encompass a cosmic narrative, I think modern secular society fails to serve them in that regard. Which is a shame, because I think such a thing would be both possible and desirable.
I'm not sure what you mean by secular society attempting to convey a cosmic narrative.
Well, look at the sort of thing that's on offer on television, for instance; get rich/get famous/join the Armed Forces/buy more crap. Relatively speaking there's hardly anything about the pursuing the knowledge of nature and what there is tends to be dumbed down. It's mostly capitalist materialism or nationalism or racism and other such petty, divisive shit.
Ok, we can agree about the deficient available narratives but I don't know what 'pursuing the knowledge of nature' means in terms of creating a more satisfying substitute.
As I see it, one of the meta-social functions of religion is to provide a cosmic narrative in which humans as a species have a specific role or destiny.
I don't think science or philosophy can provide said narrative in of themselves...
... but I do think they can aid in the construction of one...
... however, it seems that right now not enough people are interested enough for it to happen. It wouldn't make money and it wouldn't flatter or jive with any religious narratives, so any earnest attempts end up being stillborn.
You seem to be talking about it being desirable to construct some kind of grand narrative that either doesn't compete with or has a complementary relation to modern scientific understanding - I'm not sure what such a thing looks like in your mind.
Do you have any examples of any of the 'stillborn earnest attempts' that spring most readily to mind?
Secular Humanism as an explicit life stance (as opposed mere irreligion) would seem to qualify.
Is there a split? Seems like both "possibilities" are the kind of thing that's easily deferred give the challenges they actually face at the moment.
Some unpleasant stuff there, 'spaz walts'
Never seen "arrse" before? As far as I can tell, it's a bunch of present, former, and wannabe officers in the British Army
Never seen "arrse" before? As far as I can tell, it's a bunch of present, former, and wannabe officers in the British Army stroking their dicks and talking about how they'd solve the world's problems, so language like "spaz" isn't that surprising.
They seem to be conflating fantasists with people who have actual mental health issues in that piece.
What is the level of Chechen involvement in ISIS? many of these will have seen their cities raised by Putin and many will be 'battle hardened'