Bit of a waste using them on soft skinned vehicles but very effective and obviously a great morale booster, NATO isn't worried about supplying AT as I doubt we will ever have any armour in the area again, different matter re; SA.
a launch point and 3 missile tubes will fit in a car boot - 3 days drive from the Turkisk/Syrian border and they'll be at Heathrow...
we started using them against dug in positions during the Falklands war - not much Argentine armour about, but lots of well dug in machine-gun pits. Treasury went mental when they realised they cost £45k a pop in early 1980's prices, but they get the job done quickly.
Sorry butchers don't do the command stuff, anyway... summerise eh?really can't be arsed to read these pdf's. summerise it for me.
Very interesting piece here arguing that Isis is a colonial movement:
http://t.co/rkDNrvr4yJ
ISIS control over major parts of Syria’s northeastern regions relies on military and political
control by an ideological foreign elite
As Kobane residents, some 200,000 who fled to Turkey due to the attacks of jihadist militants, await returning to the war-torn city after the 134th day of clashes, a senior leader of the Kurdish forces has thanked Turkey for its efforts.
“We thank everyone, Turkey in particular, for their support in Kobane,” said Enver Muslim, a senior official of the Democratic Union Party (PYD). The Turkish government views the PYD with deep suspicion because of its ties to the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). “Everyone has a share in this success,” Muslim said, adding that they would start working on the return of the residents soon. Kurdish officials in Kobane plan to make a call for the return of the displaced people by spring, as the town has vastly been destroyed and is facing water and utility problems, Doğan News Agency reported yesterday.
Stopped reading there. Argument applies only if you regard the nation-state as axiomatic.
While I'm not sure I agree with froggy's quote (though I think it's an interesting angle to look at it from I think it's more complicated than that and I'm not entirely convinced ISIS, though definitely nowhere near as socially embedded as for example the Kurdish groups, are quite as lacking in local support as it claims) I do find it thought provoking and I don't think yours is a good reason to completely dismiss it - because if we applied the same logic to resistance to European colonialism in Africa surely we'd have to conclude that they weren't really resisting colonial regimes because internationalism or something. The point it makes, and possibly runs too far with in framing it as colonialism - is worth making: ISIS aren't run by leaders who are organically linked to those areas - their administrators are from outside the social groups they rule over - and recognised as such by said social groups - and depend on military power and repression for the continuation of their rule. I think it's a stretch to call that colonialism but it's not the terrible article you seem to be making it out to be IMO
Spanish and German communists fighting with the MLKP (ally of the PKK IIRC) in Syria
Given what we know about Turkey's behaviour this is a bit odd
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/Default.aspx?pageID=238&nID=77594&NewsCatID=352
Are they just trying to be gentlemanly and take the high road?
A much more worthwhile endeavour than that of the Spanish tankies in Ukraine....
Right now are revolution has gone of course. No group is thinking about the revolution but are counting the money they have taken from international powers. They are not supported by any people, and have simply become the tools of the states who give them money. Every group has a state, an intelligence organization behind it. It has become such that intelligence organizations of Western states come and meet with them and the first question they ask is “how many fighters do you have?” This is enough to explain the civil war in Syria. Without any support from the people, or organization or common goals they have not been able to take one step forward. Those most organized and connected with the people in Syria are first and foremost the Kurds. For this reason they will never be defeated. After the Kurds come the Islamic groups. Some of them have some connection with the people. But the FSA groups that have come out talking about revolution can do nothing in their existing state and with their existing logic, and as soon as foreign support is cut they will fall apart and disappear.
Phil, I like you - you make me laugh. But these personal attacks - especially against a poster who you know has you on ignore - aren't really necessary and will end up derailing an interesting thread. I've hardly posted on this thread because I openly admit I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to this issue but I I've learned more from this thread than anythin else I've read about ISIS and I'd quite like that to continue.
Thanks for your politeness Spiney, it's appreciated.
But J Ed has been screaming for war with Turkey for months now. He loses no opportunity to glorify the PKK. Now he's glorifying Western volunteers who'll travel across the world to fight with them.
You can't expect me (by which I mean anyone in my circumstances) not to get angry at him. And you can't expect me not to tell him so, in the strongest possible terms.
And he obviously hasn't got me on ignore.