Reno
The In Kraut
Leica said:I envy the people you go to the movies with.
I probably bore them to tears by now.
Leica said:I envy the people you go to the movies with.
hmm, they are lucky people and they know it.Reno said:
Reno said:Rosemary's Baby is a satire and an allegory about the banality of evil rather than about Christianity as such and it's supposed to be funny as well as scary. It's ambiguous about the religious/supernatural elements of its plot as it's perfectly plausible that being a lapsed Catholic and emotionally fragile, Rosemary is deluded and is only imagining that her child is the son of the devil (we never see the baby). Unlike the other two films it doesn't presume a pro-Christian stance.
Jambooboo said:We do see the baby. The last scene - "He has his fathers eyes!" and we see a very unhuman creature.
This is the scene mimicked in the Astronaut's Wife only it is done in a farcical way, the astronaut's face is meant to look threatening but in fact looks contorted and rather ridiculous seen from below (from the woman's perspective, he is supposed to transform into someone she doesn't recognise).Reno said:a brief close up of Satan's eyes from her point of view as she remembers getting raped.
cymrukid said:That being said, the only time I can remember being genuinely disturbed by such a film was during the otherwise shite third Exorcist film, the part where there's a lingering shot of a hospital corridor and a nurse doing her rounds and suddenly this cloaked figure suddenly comes into view.
Reno said:It's a great scene. I don't think the film is that bad actually. Originally it was shot under the title Legion, which was William Peter Blatty's literary follow up to his novel of The Exorcist focusing on two minor characters from the book. Then the studio decided it would be more profitable to call it Exorcist III and after that they decided that the film now needed an exorcism (the original novel and script had absolutely nothing to do with exorcism) and shoot and inserted the hokey subplot about the priest who follows a calling to eventually perform the title task, which close to ruins the film. Parts of it are still quite powerful and as with you, at the time it was one of the few horror films I'd seen that genuinely scared me. I wished they gave Blatty a chance to restore the original version of his film, which apparently he's desperate to do.
I've not seen it but can it be more ridiculous than the "sex in armour" scene from Excalibur?Leica said:This is the scene mimicked in the Astronaut's Wife only it is done in a farcical way, the astronaut's face is meant to look threatening but in fact looks contorted and rather ridiculous seen from below (from the woman's perspective, he is supposed to transform into someone she doesn't recognise).
Speaking of sex scenes, I'm sure I've mentioned this here before: I used to know someone who'd been to film school in the eighties and he said the scene that was singled out as prime example of how not to do it was in a film called Bolero. I've seen this film and the scene in question is indeed quite funny, complete with bed detaching itself from the ground and revolving around the room to the score of Bo Derek's ecstatic sounds.Donna Ferentes said:I've not seen it but can it be more ridiculous than the "sex in armour" scene from Excalibur?
Donna Ferentes said:Talking of Bolero, do any of the film buffs here know anything about a cartoon I saw years ago, in which life evolves on a planet from a discarded Coke bottle while Ravel plays in the background?
In the end The Omen has to be more scary because it doesnt feature a spinning puppet's head spewing pea soup at the camera. And the music's way better.
Had you seen the film when it was first released this scene wouldn't have been a problem. Friedkin added it back in for one of the (two? three? I've lost count) re-edits he's supervised over the years.especially where she crab walks down the stairs. I know everyone else says its silly but I still find it genuinely terrifying.
Yeah I was aware. Have seen a few versions including the original, over the years. Found them all scary.Had you seen the film when it was first released this scene wouldn't have been a problem. Friedkin added it back in for one of the (two? three? I've lost count) re-edits he's supervised over the years.
Saw them both when they were first released. Loved The Omen (the sequels not so much), left a bit unmoved by The Exorcist. Mileage does indeed vary.