Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
You're intending to leave us?How long will you three need to obsess over me until your pain goes away?
You're intending to leave us?How long will you three need to obsess over me until your pain goes away?
Who did you back when China invaded Vietnam in the late 70s Donald? Must have been one goody and one baddy.How long will you three need to obsess over me until your pain goes away?
I'll admit, I'm warming to this theory of yours. I've spent some time thinking through the various possible explanations, and I have to say I can't think of a single one which explains this weirdo better than yours.He's a paid Chinese propagandist, trust me, I've encountered countless before and he is a typical case. Don't waste your time on him.
Wumao can be identified by their obsession with the USA and belief that almost all countries are somehow tributary states of the USA, and a classically fascist world view which views global politics as a constant struggle for hegemony of great powers. Only the US, China, and maybe Russia are relevant to them, and all other countries are seen as pawns and understood only in their relationship to the US or China. They have minimal understanding of political theory so there is no point trying to talk about class or Marxism with them, and when challenged they won't engage with your points - for they do not have real) serious views but are just paid to disrupt - but will instead resort to evasion, mockery, and irrelevant attacks on the US.
Expect more of these dullards in the coming years, but this is the is the characteristic worldview and behaviour to look out for and how to recognise them. We're going to gave to get used to it I'm afraid. I recommend we just ban them as they aren't interested in genuine discussion.
actually, either that or some previously banned f-wit returning on a massive windupHe's a paid Chinese propagandist, trust me, I've encountered countless before and he is a typical case. Don't waste your time on him.
Wumao can be identified by their obsession with the USA and belief that almost all countries are somehow tributary states of the USA, and a classically fascist world view which views global politics as a constant struggle for hegemony of great powers. Only the US, China, and maybe Russia are relevant to them, and all other countries are seen as pawns and understood only in their relationship to the US or China. They have minimal understanding of political theory so there is no point trying to talk about class or Marxism with them, and when challenged they won't engage with your points - for they do not have real) serious views but are just paid to disrupt - but will instead resort to evasion, mockery, and irrelevant attacks on the US.
Expect more of these dullards in the coming years, but this is the is the characteristic worldview and behaviour to look out for and how to recognise them. We're going to gave to get used to it I'm afraid. I recommend we just ban them as they aren't interested in genuine discussion.
Maybe it's because I'm a Canadian and you people just can't tolerate Canadians disagreeing with your US apologizing on your knees. So since you're still obsessing over my comments two hours later, I won't laugh in your face if you feel obliged to take a shot back at me.actually, either that or some previously banned f-wit returning on a massive windup
Rimbaud that is really interesting. Would such a person be an actual canadian and if so how would they come to this work?
I'll admit, I'm warming to this theory of yours. I've spent some time thinking through the various possible explanations, and I have to say I can't think of a single one which explains this weirdo better than yours.
What on earth he hopes to achieve by doing it on U75 is completely beyond me, though.
really? That's really intriguing to know.Wumao budget has been increased because the CCP have realised they've got a public relations nightmare so I suppose they've started branching out away from Quora, Youtube and Reddit.
If this guy's any guide, they badly need to review their hiring and presonnel polcies.Unfortunately for them, as we can see from this strange fellow, it isn't something they can fix by throwing more money at.
The people's iron fist continues to prevail!
Maduro Keeps Winning in Venezuela | Novara Media
Maduro swept the votes at last week’s “mega-elections”. Yet until Biden lifts sanctions that have killed over 40,000 Venezuelans to date, he'll struggle to get the country back on track.novaramedia.com
The leftist president of Chile is pretty scathing of the credibility of these results.Maduro wins:
Fairly sour grapes from the FT:
Venezuela’s authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro declared election winner
View attachment 435480
And another perspective:
View attachment 435481
View attachment 435482
Yes. And among left-wing leaders, it's not only Boric who disbelieves the Chavista's dodgy electoral body (CNC). It's also Lula in Brasil and Petro in Colombia and so on.The leftist president of Chile is pretty scathing of the credibility of these results.
This is looking like an absolute stitch up from Maduro’s lot.
I don't trust the FT or the NYT but neither do I trust Assadist apologists like Rania Khalek.Maduro wins:
Fairly sour grapes from the FT:
Venezuela’s authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro declared election winner
View attachment 435480
And another perspective:
View attachment 435481
View attachment 435482
Yeah this is a situation where it's very hard to get a good idea of the truth, though I expect it lies in between... The west has certainly tried to destabilise and coup in Venezuela since Chavez.... Moduro seems more the authoritarian than Chavez whose democratic credentials were highly praised.
The dynamic looks quite Cuban to me...
I don't doubt any of that. Whatever we may think of him and his politics though is a parallel sideline to the bigger dynamics of foreign interference, coups and democratic electionsChavez squandered his democratic credentials over time, concentrated power to an extent that even some wholehearted supporters couldnt overlook in the end, and even earned some criticism from Chomsky in this respect. He also blew it when it came to the Arab Spring uprisings, aligning himself with a number of tired old regimes rather than the hopes of the multitude.
Thats certainly why I remember going off him, despite the fact that I was a fan of much of what he achieved earlier on. In the years since it seems that things carried on in that direction, with the crude versions of the anti-imperialist left, with all their usual apologists for shit regimes, being the regimes main defenders in more recent times. I cannot operate along those lines, even though the leading opposition figures tend to have political and economic stances that I am certainly no fan of either.
I wont try to provide supporting articles for everything I've said right now, so for now I'll just post a link to this one article from 2012 about how he blew it in regards the Arab spring, since the consequences of that alignment with Assadists etc are still highly relevant when we look at who was putting out predictable, template pro-regime propaganda about this current election being fairly won even before it took place.
How Hugo Chavez botched the Arab Spring
If Venezuela had sensible leftist leadership, the country would have pursued a more level-headed approach toward Syria.www.aljazeera.com
He also faulted Chávez for adopting enabling powers to circumvent the national assembly. "Anywhere in Latin America there is a potential threat of the pathology of caudillismo [authoritarianism] and it has to be guarded against. Whether it's over too far in that direction in Venezuela I'm not sure, but I think perhaps it is. A trend has developed towards the centralisation of power in the executive which I don't think is a healthy development."
Honestly I agree with all of that... and there were good reports from Venezuelan anarchists shared over the years.For sure thats a factor, but its used as an excuse to overlook other stuff far too often. An additional complication is that 'socialist' vs 'anti-socialist' stuff often ends up getting married to the big power blocks and competition between those around the world. China, Russia etc etc vs the west, the same old shit that relegates populations to pawns in some narratives.
I am also limited because I am not a South America expert. I might hope that an increase in the number of left-leaning governments in various South American countries in recent decades might, at their best, offer a model for getting beyond the usual narratives, getting beyond the cycles of such governments being overthrown by non-democratic means or finding themselves perpetually aligned to dodgy global powers. But I dont know to what extent this is actually the case.
If I look back to a period where Chomsky was prepared to raise some concerns about Venezuela, and put up with using a biased source that I cannot trust not to selectively quote, then this sort of thing is certainly worth keeping in mind:
Thats from this 2011 article: Noam Chomsky criticises old friend Hugo Chávez for 'assault' on democracy