Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

*The Archers thread

Its the lack of research that drives me mad.

It's always been unrealistic but now it goes in for storylines that just ask for nitpicking.

The Tom ready meals is the most obvious. And they go on about them so much :(

But the one that drove me round the bend was Ed and Emma's poverty. The scriptwriters had been told by the editor 'not to go down the benefits route'. Why the hell not?

I thought the programme was originally planned to disseminate information?

I also hate the Vicky baby storyline. I think a very one sided view has been shown and doubt the scriptwriters have the stamina to deal with a lifelong issue.

But I think the show won't last that long.
 
I used to listen without fail. For the first time ever I now switch the radio off and don't listen to the omnibus either.
 
How do you know? It was originally supposed to be informative and I don't see why they don;'t use the storylines to give info about benefits and public services.
Vanessa Whitburn ( the editor) used those exact words in a Women's Hour interview about 2 months ago.

If I can find a link I will do so.

It was a huge talking point on the now defunct BBC message board.
 
Tom really should die.
I was about to say the wrong brother died but that just reminded me about the grandson who caused so much drama and has now been entirely forgotten.

Of course Emma and ed would be eligible for benefits and it infuriates me that they just swerved from reality for fear of upsetting their middle England listeners.

I hate to say this bit I think Vanessa needs to go. I've been listening for 30 years and I just don't care any more. It makes me really sad :(
 
I hate to say this bit I think Vanessa needs to go. I've been listening for 30 years and I just don't care any more. It makes me really sad :(
This, although I've been actively listening for over 40. One of my children even showed recognition of Barwick Green at a few days old as she'd heard the the tune twice a day for the best part of nine months
 
It's terrible isn't it?

I mean that so many long term listeners feel like this ?

It's been part of my life for nearly 50 years. I stopped listening about 4 years ago, only starting again last summer.

Now I tune in for irritation's sake.

And I only do that on I player, certainly wouldn't if I had to remember when it was on.
 
I was a dedicated listener for decades but I can't bear to hear it now. I dropped it in the aftermath of the SATTC debacle - I just hated the way I felt the audience was being manipulated and disrespected.
 
It's an absolutely stunning story line on how boring whatshisname is with his sausages and demands for where the business goes. They've built up him droning on and on about his sausages over the months (years?) so that it's entirely convincing when whatshername tells him how boring and self centred he's been.

The only people likely to find whatshisname more boring than whatshername does are all the Archers listeners who've heard him droning on and on all these months about his fucking sausages.
 
I loath the Archers. I can listen to radio 4 all day quite happily, but am compelled to turn it off at the first sound of The Archers (and The Moral Maze). The same shit every day, 3 times a week
 
I hate to say this bit I think Vanessa needs to go. I've been listening for 30 years and I just don't care any more. It makes me really sad :(

Bully!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-21978079

She feels bullied.

They keep referring Nigel's death but I don't mind that....when he was selling swimming pools in the 80s I think we would have relished the thought of it...it's the piling up of smaller dramas that are clichéd, peter out, or don't seem thoroughly researched.

Anyway, we will see what it's like under new management.
 
You'll be telling me he wasn't a crime solving chef next. He managed to keep his family very private going y the number of articles saying he is childless
 
You'll be telling me he wasn't a crime solving chef next. He managed to keep his family very private going y the number of articles saying he is childless
If you listen to Desert Island Discs (still available) you'll learn that he did have children. He just wanted to keep his family completely out of the glare that celebrity brings.
 
"Every time I've talked about my family in the past, people have ended up getting upset," he says. "So I said to my friends and family: 'I shan't refer to you at all, and there's nothing for you to get upset about. There's the deal.'" He finishes by flashing that chipmunk grin of his - a baring of teeth that could be seen as either jovial or aggressive. He won't even confirm whether or not he has any children (the cuttings suggest not). "I'm not interested in the casual interest of strangers," he says in his flat, trace-of-Teesside vowels"

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/richard-griffiths-a-touch-of-class-419571.html
 
Back
Top Bottom