Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

*The Archers thread

I didn't hear it, or the implication of it.

It might have been a mistake for Justin to spin the story that Rob had left for the USA because 1) he hasn't and 2) when he shows up around Ambridge the story is going to be obviously false.. and it was certainly a mistake to pay Stefan off as he will be back. It would have been smarter to call the police and lay out what actually happened, imo.
Not convinced by the script that has Justin pay off Stefan. Any fule kno that blackmailers always come back for more. And it is a completely unconvincing story that Rob left on the spot for a job in the States. Visa, etc? to say nothing of normal working practices even in a cutthroat industry. Justin is definitely dodgy but he's not stupid.
ETA: I've just been back over several eps summaries to check I hadn't missed a bit where eg Stefan blackmailed Justin over Lilian or something else.
 
He's Justin, he's so clever he could get a rock solid deal that will definitely never ever be referred to again.
 
I thought he'd been there more than a month? IIRC it's a common law right, not a statutory one. Would make me laugh, anyway, that Justin has flushed away the witness.
Unfortunately not. You need to be employed for two years before you can claim unfair dismissal.

Blame the fucking Tories for that one.

The people who are taking us out of the EU, which at least provides some cushions for employment rights.
 
Unfair dismissal is the statutory one. Wrongful dismissal is common law, or used to be. (Rarely used, because statutory protection and tribunal more straightforward. Did it get abolished? :eek: ) But anyway, it's only a story.

ETA, fwiw Wrongful dismissal in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia
But that is only about a breach of contract claim and is only really about notice pay. Justin said that he would pay him until the end of the month anyway, which may well have covered his entitlement to notice.

Besides which, there was a fundamental breakdown of trust and confidence when Justin found out how Rob had behaved, so he would have been able to terminate his contract without notice.
 
But that is only about a breach of contract claim and is only really about notice pay. Justin said that he would pay him until the end of the month anyway, which may well have covered his entitlement to notice.

Besides which, there was a fundamental breakdown of trust and confidence when Justin found out how Rob had behaved, so he would have been able to terminate his contract without notice.
You're right, the damages wouldn't be worth it. I was overlooking that and assuming there might be some exemplary element available. :oops: All I meant is that Justin wouldn't be able to prove that Rob had done what was alleged, because he'd paid off the only witness.

But I was being a bit frivolous anyway. :D It would be just like Rob to turn some kind of shitty situation to his advantage and I was speculating without serious thought how he could do that.

And yes, let's have Charlie Thomas back now that Adam and Ian are patching things up. Rob was fiddling the books there about the yields, wasn't he?

God what a soap. I don't know why I listen, especially when they leave the best bits to the imagination.
 
Toby stood up Pip (special lunch with meatballs) and Josh. He rushed off from meeting Josh claiming an urgent call. How convenient. He didn't answer calls from either of them. Much later he rang Pip, apparently from the car, saying he'd had to dash to Brighton, but his call was (unconvincingly, I thought) broken, as if he was going in and out of signal.
 
And didn't Pip give Toby rather a lot of money for the Gin business, she was just hinting about getting some new furniture, while Toby was changing the subject, I bet Toby has spent that money on whatever it is in Brighton.
 
Back
Top Bottom