Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Teacher training: Teach First?

rutabowa

LOSE IT
I'm thinking of a career change into teaching. My hand has been slightly forced by the Covid, but the more I look into it and talk to people the more I think it might genuinely be the right thing for me to do, and that I might possibly be good at it. There are a lot of routes in of course, and I'm talking to all the official people about the more usual UCAS ways... but I also applied for that Teach First programme (famously the subject of the TV show "Tough Young Teachers", ulp), which is kind of an intense course where you get 6 weeks training then are straight into a school (and probably quite a challenging school). On the TV show they are all young fresh graduates, whereas I am older and I already had one quite long career (there is absolutely no way I would have even considered this straight from university). I just wondered if anyone here had experience of Teach First... either doing it, or working with people who did it etc).
 
Haven't heard of teach first but I know people who are very happy doing schools direct which sounds like the same thing.

2 factors to consider:

1. Money. What's your major? Music? There won't be a bursary attached to most subjects next year so if you've got rent to pay a salaried scheme may be a good idea.

2. PGCE. It's an actual post graduate qualification, particularly useful if you ever want to work abroad. Gives you a theoretical agle on your practice. But the college work side of it is a massive ballache.
 
Haven't heard of teach first but I know people who are very happy doing schools direct which sounds like the same thing.

2 factors to consider:

1. Money. What's your major? Music? There won't be a bursary attached to most subjects next year so if you've got rent to pay a salaried scheme may be a good idea.

2. PGCE. It's an actual post graduate qualification, particularly useful if you ever want to work abroad. Gives you a theoretical agle on your practice. But the college work side of it is a massive ballache.
sorry cross posted. My subject is maths... so there are a few salaried courses available on UCAS as well as this route....
 
24k bursary for doing a PGCE. You want to make sure you're getting more than that on a salaried scheme. Bearing in mind you pay tax on a salary and not on a bursary.
ahh interesting, that is a really good point.... A PGCE is 1 or 2 years, and is a full time course but with in school contact time, is that right?
 
ahh interesting.... A PGCE is 1 or 2 years, and is a full time course but with in school contact time, is that right?
1 year unless you do part time. Evn if you do part time I think they try to get you to do it in a year and a half, doesn't have to be two years. And depending on covid situation should be starting in schools within a few weeks of starting training. Some bright spark at UEL decided to hold back placements till after half term to allow the covid situation to 'improve' and most of us ended up losing weeks to isolation orders. In a normal year it's mostly actual teaching.
 
I hadn't really considered doing a PGCE with a bursary, I'd assumed I'd need to do some kind of work/learn on the job scheme, so this is really useful thanks...

My initial thought was primary, but the Teach First primary places were full up, and then once I started thinking about secondary it has kind of started to appeal more and more. it does sound like a really intense course, but it is all about levelling up education in low income areas and inclusivity and all sorts of things that really appeal to me. Even though you probably earn no more money than just getting a bursary to study, for maths anyway...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sue
The drop out rates from teach first are a lot higher than the traditional route - only 40% of them stick at it, it's much higher via a PGCE - you just can't learn the necessary skills in their programme so it's much more of a sink or swim situation.

Mrs B's area of research is this kind of stuff, and she reckons that it's basically bullshit, and part of various attempts by the government to undermine the teaching profession and privatise the sector. Do a PGCE.
 
I did an FE orientated PGCE but for us it was 2 or 3 days teaching and 2 days of uni stuff for the first half of the year and then 3 or 4 days teaching and 1 day of uni stuff for the second half (If i remember correctly)
My numbers might be a little mixed up as I was also continuing to teach at my normal job centre training workplace while also doing some stuff at a regular college (I wanted a placement to see what FE was like outside my bubble)

I found things easy but that was because I had already had some experience and I come from a family of teachers.
I think doing a compulsory education leveled PGCE would be a lot harder due to all the behaviour management stuff.
It's not that you don't have behaviour management in FE it's just I managed to get lucky and not have to deal with much of it until a few years back.
 
The drop out rates from teach first are a lot higher than the traditional route - only 40% of them stick at it, it's much higher via a PGCE - you just can't learn the necessary skills in their programme so it's much more of a sink or swim situation.

Mrs B's area of research is this kind of stuff, and she reckons that it's basically bullshit, and part of various attempts by the government to undermine the teaching profession and privatise the sector. Do a PGCE.
Interesting.... none of the other routes into teaching advisers ever have much to say about it! But, I have also seen really glowing reports from people who've actually done it.... well, I'm definitely going to apply for as many routes as possible, so as not to rule them out too early. Just I already passed the application stage of Teach First, next stage is an all-day live assessment.
 
I hadn't really considered doing a PGCE with a bursary, I'd assumed I'd need to do some kind of work/learn on the job scheme, so this is really useful thanks...

My initial thought was primary, but the Teach First primary places were full up, and then once I started thinking about secondary it has kind of started to appeal more and more. it does sound like a really intense course, but it is all about levelling up education in low income areas and inclusivity and all sorts of things that really appeal to me. Even though you probably earn no more money than just getting a bursary to study, for maths anyway...
Just to clarify, a PGCE is on the job training. You wouldn't spend much time at uni at all. If I wasn't off I would currently be working a five day week teaching (online admittedly but that's not because it's a pgce). Unless someone decides to send you to a posh bit of Essex (as happened with me) you'll be teaching at a school local to you. Also, if you do it at a very liberal school (like UEL) there will be plenty of practical stuff on inclusivity, decolonising the curriculum etc.
 
I did an FE orientated PGCE but for us it was 2 or 3 days teaching and 2 days of uni stuff for the first half of the year and then 3 or 4 days teaching and 1 day of uni stuff for the second half (If i remember correctly)
My numbers might be a little mixed up as I was also continuing to teach at my normal job centre training workplace while also doing some stuff at a regular college (I wanted a placement to see what FE was like outside my bubble)

I found things easy but that was because I had already had some experience and I come from a family of teachers.
I think doing a compulsory education leveled PGCE would be a lot harder due to all the behaviour management stuff.
It's not that you don't have behaviour management in FE it's just I managed to get lucky and not have to deal with much of it until a few years back.
Yeah I'd definitely not be doing FE, I'm between primary and secondary....
 
The drop out rates from teach first are a lot higher than the traditional route - only 40% of them stick at it, it's much higher via a PGCE - you just can't learn the necessary skills in their programme so it's much more of a sink or swim situation.

Mrs B's area of research is this kind of stuff, and she reckons that it's basically bullshit, and part of various attempts by the government to undermine the teaching profession and privatise the sector. Do a PGCE.
Sounds about right. Give you just about enough to get you going but also little enough to not have to pay you the full rate.
Whenever I did cover for secondary I would only be given cover supervisor rates instead of teaching rates as I didn't have QTS (as I was FE)

While I appreciate the idea of opening up teaching to let subject specialists who don't have a degree or teaching qualifications still contribute I find what happens on the ground is they use this as an excuse to pay you less and move figures around on the spreadsheet to make themselves look better.
 
I did a pgce with a bursary - £9k and no fees. Childcare grant too.

There’s a lot of teaching experience on the course, three placements and by my third one I think you’re supposed to be teaching 70%. Though in practice I did 100% in my 3rd placement as the teacher was also SENCO and was so pleased to have someone to cover :D
 
I did a pgce with a bursary - £9k and no fees. Childcare grant too.

There’s a lot of teaching experience on the course, three placements and by my third one I think you’re supposed to be teaching 70%. Though in practice I did 100% in my 3rd placement as the teacher was also SENCO and was so pleased to have someone to cover :D
Yeah, you get 85% of childcare costs covered as a full time student and can get a student parent grant (just under two grand). I even get an adult dependant grant as wife not working.
 
I did a pgce with a bursary - £9k and no fees. Childcare grant too.

There’s a lot of teaching experience on the course, three placements and by my third one I think you’re supposed to be teaching 70%. Though in practice I did 100% in my 3rd placement as the teacher was also SENCO and was so pleased to have someone to cover :D
I think if I understood right I can only get a bursary if it was secondary maths, there's no bursary for primary courses... but there are a few paid courses near me.
 
it's basically bullshit, and part of various attempts by the government to undermine the teaching profession and privatise the sector. Do a PGCE.
Absolutely this. I had 2 TF trainees with me a couple of years ago. It did not go well. It can be done - 6 weeks and then teach - but ime it's hellish for all concerned. As a TF trainee, you basically get thrown at under-staffed schools; the majority in very challenging contexts. One of my trainees couldn't cope with being called a cunt all day (by the kids, not me); the other could do it but couldn't handle the workload, which is astronomical even if you know vaguely what you're doing and have a few years experience under your belt. I'm not a gatekeeper or whatever - I don't necessarily think you can't teach without qualifications - I've never seen it done effectively over a period of time though.
 
I worked with some Teach First teachers. Nice enough but with a kind of bright eyed zeal about them being specially selected to save the world, going wherever they were needed to sort everything out.

And the minute a better offer comes along, ta-ra, see you later

Basically seemed like they were in it more for themselves than the kids. Wrong way round.
 
I worked with some Teach First teachers. Nice enough but with a kind of bright eyed zeal about them being specially selected to save the world, going wherever they were needed to sort everything out.

And the minute a better offer comes along, ta-ra, see you later

Basically seemed like they were in it more for themselves than the kids. Wrong way round.
Well, that isn't me, obviously. It seems like a terrible idea for a fresh graduate to do, there's no way I would have considered it then.
 
Back
Top Bottom