Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SUVs make up more than 40% of new cars sold in the UK – while fully electric vehicles account for less than 2%

Or you could accept that what people use as a shorthand on a forum post is less important than their intent, particularly when said intent has been made pretty clear by everyone involved at this point.

Apart from when a poster got jumped on because she liked having a small car with a bit more height, because it was easier for her to get in and out off.
 
Or you could accept that what people use as a shorthand on a forum post is less important than their intent, particularly when said intent has been made pretty clear by everyone involved at this point.
Not when posters have specifically railed against a Yaris Cross, one of the smallest "SUV"s on the market and well under the size and weight of your average saloon car. The Juke comes up a lot too, despite not actually being any larger or heavier than the Clio it's based on. That small crossover market, by volume, is the largest set of SUVs on the road.
 
I don't, but even a small electric can weigh much more then the equivalent fossil fuel burner because of batteries.
But that wasn't the question being asked. Of course if the electric car is smaller than the current trend for oversized chunks of metal it wouldn't have to be heavier.
 
I can't remember if it's already been discussed on here (and I can't be assed to check!) but apparently you've had to pay a surcharge when you first register a 'heavy' car in France since 1st January 2022. You pay €10 for every kilo over 1,800kg. (Taxe sur la masse en ordre de marche or malus de poids, for short) There are a few exemptions for things like EVs.


ETA: Oh, I've just noticed Ed. posted something about the French rules while I was writing this.

This makes sense. The french are great and at doing practical vehicles that maximize space and utility for their size. My partners ancient kangoo is fantastic for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chz
This makes sense. The french are great and at doing practical vehicles that maximize space and utility for their size. My partners ancient kangoo is fantastic for this.
Even the original Twingo was an absolute marvel of usable space vs. the size of the car. It's a pity the new ones are pretty much just a standard hatchback now.
 
Apart from when a poster got jumped on because she liked having a small car with a bit more height, because it was easier for her to get in and out off.
I've not noticed a shortage of people highlighting when someone gets their brands mixed up though (which mostly seems to happen because people who own smaller "SUVs" think they're being personally targeted when every picture posted makes what's actually being targeted pretty obvious), and then the actual intent of the conversation continues to be about the larger end of the market, so it's not exactly a major problem, is it.
 
I've not noticed a shortage of people highlighting when someone gets their brands mixed up though, and then the actual intent of the conversation continues to be about the larger end of the market, so it's not exactly a major problem, is it.
I suspect that's because most posters would agree that things like the new LR Defender are gross. But then there'd be nothing to argue over and the thread would die.
 
I suspect that's because most posters would agree that things like the new LR Defender are gross. But then there'd be nothing to argue over and the thread would die.
That's the bit I find irritating tbh, I'm not on here to argue about the addled marketing of car brands I'm more interested in the state of vehicle supersizing in the UK.
 
That's the bit I find irritating tbh, I'm not on here to argue about mid-market car brands I'm more interested in the state of vehicle supersizing in the UK.
It's not really a thing though, is it? The super-large SUVs are still a tiny proportion of the overall market. Sales say that most normal people aren't interested in anything larger than a Qashqai, and I think it's worth pointing out that when Nissan replaced the Almera with that they weren't actually expecting to sell that many of them. Yet in Europe it's pretty much the car that started the trend - we didn't really import the American trend for giant land-battleships, and that sort aren't much of the market. The public spotted a taller, less ugly estate car and decided they liked it - it's a consumer trend, not something the car companies rammed down our throats from across the Atlantic. (Nissan moved the Qashqai to the States and called it a Rogue and it sells well as a "small" car there) The posh sort who like this sort of thing were buying Land Rovers and Merc G-classes over a decade before the trend really kicked off, and they're still the only ones buying cars like that. High end, expensive cars are absurd, whether they're 3 feet high or 6 feet high.
 
You say that but I've been shocked by the number of giant motors chugging round Suffolk since I started spending less time in London. They're a noticeable presence and the real point is it's a growing one. Saying blithely that "it's not really a thing" is like looking at the US culture wars a few years back and thinking "oh that's alright, it's only in the US." Now is the exact time to worry about it, because they're in the process of being foisted on us at this very moment. Waiting until ten years down the line when they're already everywhere and have a major commercial and public lobby backing their continued existence would be entirely the wrong way round.
 
I’ve noticed in my smug cunt area of Surrey that the wankermobiles have definitely got a good 20% wider and longer than they were 10 years ago. It’s quite entertaining in its own way, because they can’t actually pass each other in the narrow country lanes any more. More like non-utility vehicles, amirite.
 
I’ve noticed in my smug cunt area of Surrey that the wankermobiles have definitely got a good 20% wider and longer than they were 10 years ago. It’s quite entertaining in its own way, because they can’t actually pass each other in the narrow country lanes any more. More like non-utility vehicles, amirite.

I mean that bit is funny, but what annoys me is when they don't know how wide their dam car is and find it hard to pass you.

Luckily I suspect we have far fewer up here then in Surrey.
 
Mind you, it’s a Panda 4x4, so we can now have another 5 page argument about the technical definition of an SUV, even though 90% of us know fine well the things we’re actually talking about.
 
Mind you, it’s a Panda 4x4, so we can now have another 5 page argument about the technical definition of an SUV, even though 90% of us know fine well the things we’re actually talking about.

They're awesome. If I didn't need to carry more stuff from time to time I'd have bought one in a shot.

I used to work at a kids home that was above the highest village in England. We had a few 4x4s, but when the really bad weather hit, I'd much rather have been in the Panda then anything else.
 
The problem with the largest vehicles all being firmly into the "higher earner" category is what do you do about it? These things are Status Symbols for the well-off. You can quadruple the taxes on them, and it won't get any less of them on the road. Fuel tax is already as high as it can go for the firmly average people, so you can't take advantage of their poor mileage to tax them more there. Even then, they're going electric at a much faster rate than smaller, cheaper vehicles are. I mean, by all means they should get a massive tax increase just for providing a bit more funding for other things, but it's not going to cut the trend.

The only thing that will have a big impact has already happened - interest rates have gone up. For a good decade, it was cheaper to finance a more expensive car on a lease than it was to buy something more reasonable. That's gone now.
 
It can cost you £10k a year to insure your Defender now, too. Not even that is putting people off.

What you can do about it, of course, is decide what is unacceptable and ban that thing
 
The problem with the largest vehicles all being firmly into the "higher earner" category is what do you do about it? These things are Status Symbols for the well-off. You can quadruple the taxes on them, and it won't get any less of them on the road.
The obvious thing (short of a direct ban) is a multi-pronged attack - make it expensive, inconvenient and socially unacceptable. Yes they can pay extra tax, but are they willing to when it's also an invitation for constant dirty looks, never being let out on a turn, having your car called out for being a prick's palace every time it's mentioned, keyings, rising petrol prices etc? The trick is to make having one less appealing, any step towards that is weight on the No Sale side of the scale.
 
The obvious thing (short of a direct ban) is a multi-pronged attack - make it expensive, inconvenient and socially unacceptable. Yes they can pay extra tax, but are they willing to when it's also an invitation for constant dirty looks, never being let out on a turn, having your car called out for being a prick's palace every time it's mentioned, keyings, rising petrol prices etc? The trick is to make having one less appealing, any step towards that is weight on the No Sale side of the scale.
And yet BMW sales go up every year. (I kid, I kid...)
 
It can cost you £10k a year to insure your Defender now, too. Not even that is putting people off.

What you can do about it, of course, is decide what is unacceptable and ban that thing

Tax them very hard for coming into cities. Some will still do it, but many people will choose to leave them in Surrey (or on a welsh hillside where they belong)
 
No surprise that nearly 20 pages later editor has chosen to not answer of these…
I need on a weekly basis to ferry a dog, two kids and a disabled mother in law with her wheelchair around Surrey. What car should I have chosen, oh wise one?

Seeing as you have declared that I don’t pay enough, how much should I pay for driving an electric car around? Give me a figure.

Let’s go.
 
I mean that bit is funny, but what annoys me is when they don't know how wide their dam car is and find it hard to pass you.

They can't be allowed near a hedge or a ditch either, so they just come straight at you down the middle of the road.
 
Tax them very hard for coming into cities. Some will still do it, but many people will choose to leave them in Surrey (or on a welsh hillside where they belong)
Being considered in Edinburgh


Please appreciate the amazing cunty Tory councillor quote, which came shortly after a discussion of how research has shown that pedestrian deaths caused by SUVs are increasing at a faster rate than those caused by other cars.

Cllr Munro, who is a local councillor for Bruntsfield, said: "Somebody's job and how hard they work and what they choose to spend their money on is entirely down to them; that's their house, their vehicles, that's where they shop.

"I just wanted to put that on record if anybody's listening from Bruntsfield. If you want to buy an SUV, crack on it's your money.
 
what they choose to spend their money on is entirely down to them

I hope his neighbours take the opportunity to spend their money on large, incredibly loud speaker systems mounted directly facing his living room window playing Baby Brother's "You Asked For It" on loop. It is after all their money to spend and that is the one and only factor.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom