It is really bad tbh
The grafix are like it's 1984 but maybe it's meant to be like that
The grafix are like it's 1984 but maybe it's meant to be like that
the graphics weren't that good in "84It is really bad tbh
The grafix are like it's 1984 but maybe it's meant to be like that
See also Yorkshire CC not even mentioned as a possibility for team of the year despite dominating the CC.I think it's more than that, unfortunately. It's another sign that fewer people see or care about cricket than was the case pre-Sky. Last time cricket hit the national consciousness in a big way was 2005, which was not coincidentally also the last time cricket was shown live on free-to-air tv. It'll soon be about as relevant as Rugby League.
what a pityAndy Murray !
What is this programme? Andy Murray seems to have won a small dalek.
It is a tiny model TV camera ...
Jimmy Hillthe graphics weren't that good in "84
Apart from winning something not won for 79 years.One of the most famous nominees in one of the most popular sports wins despite having accomplished the least in his sport over the last 12 months.
It's a bit secondary, though. The top players have kind of taken it in turns to take it seriously and win it - Djokovic one year, Nadal another, Federer another. Murray won't be doing it next year after the first match, or probably ever again.Apart from winning something not won for 79 years.
Apart from winning something not won for 79 years.
The premier team competition in tennis initiated in 1900; with 126 currently countries entering. This win moves the UK to third in the all-time winners list.Something that doesn't matter in the sport not won for 79 years. There are four important competitions each year in professional tennis. The Davis Cup isn't one of them.
Same emotional range mate, serendipity triumphant, etcWhat is this programme? Andy Murray seems to have won a small dalek.
Born and Raised in Manchester.
The British tend to appropriate alot of our sporting & acting talent, as one of ours said
http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quo...i-win-an-oscar-i-brenda-fricker-138-43-86.jpg
How do you know? Are you a professional tennis player? It mattered to Murray enough for him to commit to it for the last 5 years, as it took that long to drag us up from almost the bottom level of world tennis. And you could see how much it mattered to Murray when we won it. Although I guess you weren't watching anyway.Something that doesn't matter in the sport not won for 79 years. There are four important competitions each year in professional tennis. The Davis Cup isn't one of them.
Yep. Serbia went out in the quarter finals this year without Djokovic. Switzerland in the first round without Federer or Wawrinka. None of them was injured - they just had other priorities.How do I know that the Davis Cup is a sideshow? That's like asking how do you know that the Giro d'Italia is a more important race than the Giro di Toscana. It's not an important competition because the top players don't treat it like they treat Wimbledon, the US Open, the French Open, the Australian Open or even the biggest non Slam events like the ATP Tour Finals. If a competition is treated as a major goal by every top player every year, then it matters within the sport. If it isn't treated like that, it's of lesser importance. Instead, the Davis Cup is something that top players drift in and out of, occasionally going all out to win in a particular year, but mostly not..
They will play at some point tho, usually until their country wins it. They do want to win it, it rounds everything off, tho they might only do so until they win. Djokovich, Federer & Warwinka are all scheduled to play in next years (at the moment)Yep. Serbia went out in the quarter finals this year without Djokovic. Switzerland in the first round without Federer or Wawrinka. None of them was injured - they just had other priorities.
Why does it matter that the Davis cup isn't a significant trophy? Seems an odd thing to get hung up about.