FUCK. YOU.Our properties make great homes, but they're also fantastic buy-to-let investments
editor said:From their website:
FUCK. YOU.
but they have balconies, I think they are called Embassy apartments, how posh lol, I live at 13 Embassy Apt., Coldharbour Lane, sounds like Chelsea. It's Camber Sands, sorry well anyway
What better way to connect with your local community than to sit behind locked gates enjoying a slice of Bad Boy lemon-drizzle cake with a select set of neighbours.
I don't understand some people's blind defending of this "new face of Brixton".
I know, it was irony u know, the name, embassy apt doh for some ugly ass flatsThe embassy block is social housing, Printworks is shared ownership so none if it is exactly posh.
Standard on almost every new build in every part of the UK.
I share that sentiment - and I will be happy to sign up to a proposed listing. One of the Ted Hollamby era projects which somehow managed to fall on its feet.
Check his obituary - he had quite a different background from what you would expect, given what he "threw up" in his Lambeth days.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2000/jan/24/guardianobituaries
Actually maybe that's a better way to think about gated communities: that it's us - the rest of society - locking away them - undesirables - behind the gates.
(And Crispy - yes I take your point about the distinction: I don't object to gates wholesale...)
Actually this new-build for buy-to-let happened in the Victorian period too. My own house, built on land left over from the railway viaduct running along Coldharbour Lane in about 1869 (at the latest) was not owner-occupied until 1928.Particularly in London. A lot of new build is bought by the buy to let brigade.
"But Matt Griffith of first-time buyer campaign sitePricedOut, disagrees. He says: "In a market where equity is king, investors are able to outbid first-time buyers for available lower-level properties. In thehousing market, equity is nearly always a result of longevity – which gives older homeowners a head-and-shoulders advantage. Housing wealth and ownership is more generationally lopsided than it has been since the 1940s, and we appear to be seeing older groups pressing home their advantage through investment buying."
Both tenants and first-time buyers, then, face a bleak future: squeezed out of the market by house prices that remain high across swathes of the country, and soaring rents charged by landlords."
Interesting. Post war it was normal for architects to work in the public sector. Rebuilding this country after the war and making new affordable housing for the people. As the article says this was a different world to the one we live in now. If not every design was good or well built at least the ethos was building for the benefit of all people not for profit.
"These were exciting and challenging places to work in the 1950s and 1960s, attracting the very best young architects and with the focus very much on housing. Of course there were mistakes, yet the energy and concern that were channelled into the civic realm seem flabbergasting at the beginning of the 21st century, at the close of an era which has witnessed both the triumph of the private sector and the effective collapse of the great public sector architects' offices of the postwar era."
Goes to show there is another way to build our cities. Private profit is not the only way.
I suggest you join the Prince Charles tendency. Personally I have made my views known - Princess Anne is the only royal worthy to inherit the throne!Because the 1950s and 1960s are looked back on as a golden age of British architecture? Really?
Because the 1950s and 1960s are looked back on as a golden age of British architecture? Really?
Actually this new-build for buy-to-let happened in the Victorian period too. My own house, built on land left over from the railway viaduct running along Coldharbour Lane in about 1869 (at the latest) was not owner-occupied until 1928.
Of course there could ultimately be a reversal of prices which would then result in older owner occupiers having a more normal level of equity, but would massively hit those who have struggled to purchase in the last 5 - 10 years.
No doubt avoiding this is the main reason for QE I QE II etc - whatever the government says about lending to small businesses.
Because the 1950s and 1960s are looked back on as a golden age of British architecture? Really?
Do you think Coldharbour Lane rents will be going up like that when Barratts comes onstream? I understood the going rate for flats at Loughbough Mansions/Kenyon Mansions etc. is currently £200 per week and the for sale price about £200,000.QE is about bailing out the banks. The QE has gone straight into banks to rebuild there balance sheets.
Renting was the norm for a long while. But people used to have more tenancy rights in and in many areas rents were controlled. Gradually this was all swept away.
When I say "Buy to let" I mean the more recent phenomenon of the get rich quick merchants. The type who have told several people I know in North East London that they will be upping there rent by 40% as the recent improvements in the area and Olypmpic "regeneration" means they can charge more.
Similar to Barrets going on about how Brixton had improved.
If the top were to fall out of the market for some reason the bubble could start to deflate.
IMHO the only thing keeping property up in London is the low interest rates.
Buy-to-let currently appears to be a much safer investment than bank deposits - yields are 5-7% from lettings and the underlying capital value continues to rise.
If the capital values start to go down it could be a different story. Not least because those who finance their buy to lets on bank mortgages would be unable to roll over their loans.
But then again maybe I read the City AM too much!
Should they not rather have torn it up and issued a new one with a much better deal for local residents?
I wonder how their "consultation" on the redevelopment of Southwyck House is coming on? Any info gratefully received.
You are right about investing in enterprise. Unfortunately the same thing applies to government and local government funding - due to the rise of the PFI. Formerly the government, LCC etc issued Gilts or hypothecated loan stock such as War Loan, or Gas bonds (when the gas companies were nationalised in the 1940s), and such issues would be bought by pension funds and used as totally predictable investments to pay pensions etc. Now it is all a casino game. Banks and private equity form consortia competing to fund hospitals and schools where they have the right to charge £500 to change a light bulb! The situation would be laughable if it wasn't tragic.Many boomer-generation middle-class people used the easy credit pre-2008 to ''leverage" their savings into buy-to-let property. Smart move for them, because the system for getting savings into enterprise, where it might contribute something positive to the economy, is fucked. Those who put their pension savings into managed funds mostly had them stolen. The message is still that the property ladder is a much better way to prosperity than the enterprise ladder.
Many boomer-generation middle-class people used the easy credit pre-2008 to ''leverage" their savings into buy-to-let property. Smart move for them, because the system for getting savings into enterprise, where it might contribute something positive to the economy, is fucked. Those who put their pension savings into managed funds mostly had them stolen. The message is still that the property ladder is a much better way to prosperity than the enterprise ladder.
And here's the delightful piece of architecture that's coming our way.
Is it an office block? Council offices? No, it's Brixton Square, the kind of square where the public aren't allowed in!
http://www.urban75.org/blog/brixton...ith-flats-starting-at-a-quarter-of-a-million/
Many boomer-generation middle-class people used the easy credit pre-2008 to ''leverage" their savings into buy-to-let property. Smart move for them, because the system for getting savings into enterprise, where it might contribute something positive to the economy, is fucked. Those who put their pension savings into managed funds mostly had them stolen. The message is still that the property ladder is a much better way to prosperity than the enterprise ladder.
Not just middle class. I was talking to a receptionist I know a while back who said she and husband were looking at new flat. She said it was to be part of there buy to let portfolio. A lot of people were doing this. I talked to friend who said it was easy to get a mortgage that was specifically for B to L property. Im not clear how it works but seemed that once u had one property u could get another. Would work as long as you had rental stream coming in to cover costs and the value of property always went up.
Its why on new developments in London often a lot of flats were bought as "investment" property for rental.
It would be surprising if there was NOT a period of negative equity in due course.
Bringing the look of a business park in Bracknell to Brixton.....nice......
The same thing in Spain by the way - just giving back the flat keys to the bank does NOT extinguish the mortgage.That would be most interesting. In Latvia ,which is held up as poster boy by IMF for the rightness of "austerity", people have been losing there homes. They were encouraged to take out mortgages ( new in Eastern Europe where most housing was state owned) and now have had there wages cut. This has meant they cannot keep up on mortgage payments. Also the flats/ houses are not worth what they bought them for. Bizarrely whilst being encouraged to join jolly old Capitalism there is no way to go bankrupt. So in theory whilst being homeless if you ever earn money again you will still have to pay off the Bankers. Of course none of this effects the post Communists elites who run theses countries.
As my Lithuanian friend says these East European post Communist elites make sure the system works for them . There is a semblance of democracy. There is free speech but the elites run the show.
In Hungary its even more crazy. People were encouraged to take out mortgages in other currencies. Now the economy has gone tits up they are all screwed. Big problem , for the Bankers that is, is that they may never get there money back so its a toxic debt. They are trying to make the Government responsible for it I believe.
The joys of the free market.
The same thing in Spain by the way - just giving back the flat keys to the bank does NOT extinguish the mortgage.