Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Russian History Series on Radio 4

Seperately, this is doing the rounds on the interwebs. An interpretation of Soviet history to the Tetris tune. Only really gets going at 50s.

 
1905 - does he talk of the Imperial Japanese Navy handing the Russians their severely Trafalgared arses back, in the Tsushima Strait?

I haven't listened to it, but would guess it generally won't tell me a great deal.

What does he mean by 'east' though? Exploring the differences between their west (us), and themselves - or their east? Probably a bit of both.

It would be interesting to see how much importance he places on Mongol-Tatar rule and the development of the distinctive Muscovite political culture which eventually came to encompass the whole country and empire; a synthesis of dark European forest versus 'wild' Asian steppe.

Does he cover the eighteenth/nineteenth-century looking eastward, to act as a mirror to hold up to the western European imperial powers? To be great and dominant there like their western rivals. And to make up for feelings of failure at penetration and influence, being locked out and misunderstood, with all the mutual distrust. Although borrowing from their ancestors, the eastern peoples and their lands were to be the building blocks of Orthodox Russian superiority.

The Tetris vid is a bit crap btw. Mind you, I have never been able to trill my 'R's adequately.
 
I have been personally told by a self-appointed member of the intelligentsia that I am mere 'province.' So I am always going to be on the outside looking in.
 
Captain Hurrah

"1905 - does he talk of the Imperial Japanese Navy handing the Russians their severely Trafalgared arses back, in the Tsushima Strait?"

Yep, in some detail and that is more or less where we are up to.

As for your other questions I haven't listened that far back in the series generally. Why "the wild east" - probably just a simpllistic play on words as far as I can tell.

He has covered the intelligentsia's frustrations with trying to stir up revolutionary sentiment and their general self-appointed vibe. It's possible he won't tell you much you didn't know if you happen to know quite a lot. It's a sort of thorough A Level standard I would say.
 
Captain Hurrah

"1905 - does he talk of the Imperial Japanese Navy handing the Russians their severely Trafalgared arses back, in the Tsushima Strait?"

Yep, in some detail and that is more or less where we are up to.

And the revolutionary sailor uprisings in Vladivostok and its surrounds as a consequence of the Navy's weakened state.
 
In Soviet Russia history documentaries on the radio listen to you!




Sorry, it's a kind of compulsion.
 
It's only 1905 comrade - the textile worker soviet of Ivanovo-Voznesensk is up and running, but it'll be another seventeen years before you can start using Mr Smirnoff's gags.
 
Who does he give credit to for setting up the Petro Soviet? The anarchist Voline said that he was involved, but that it was mostly spontaneous. Trotsky gets elected chair in the end, of course, but he wasn't a bolshevik back then.
 
Who does he give credit to for setting up the Petro Soviet? The anarchist Voline said that he was involved, but that it was mostly spontaneous. Trotsky gets elected chair in the end, of course, but he wasn't a bolshevik back then.

And the separate Petersburg Committee, the Bolshevik organisation conducting work in the capital, with its rank and file discontents at odds with the Central Committee before the July Days - with some workers teaming up with the anarchist-communists, who were wanting to fuck off the Provisional Government, NOW.
 
And the separate Petersburg Committee, the Bolshevik organisation conducting work in the capital, with its rank and file discontents at odds with the Central Committee before the July Days - with some workers teaming up with the anarchist-communists, who were wanting to fuck off the Provisional Government, NOW.

I suspect the anarchists will be predictably undersung from what I've heard so far. Not certain though, they might have mentioned Bakunin in passing earlier. Tolstoy certainly got mentioned as influential but that is ultimately going to be more 'intellectual' and some reject him for his Christianity (not me as it happens). Internal bolshevik politics have certainly not been mentioned yet. We just got to the Kadets final fallout with the SDs, Bolshies and Mensheviks so there could well be more to come. The sailors you alluded to earlier certainly got mentioned.
 
Tolstoy and The Kingdom of God is Within You? I've never read it.

There is however an interesting history of anti-state religiosity among peasants, who for a long time had been involved in various rebellious raskolniki Old Believer sects (The Wanderers etc), practising their faith in resistance to the Russian state, who they saw as the rule of the Anti-Christ.

Serfs tied as chattels to noble estates escaped to join them, and richer and educated non-peasant Old Believers helped to hide them from the authorities, while also helping to teach a fair few how to read and write, including women. They were also a way for serfs without necessarily having the freedom to choose who they wanted to marry, to elope. They could acquire for themselves a different, independent identity and also a cultural authority, previously denied them.

This sectarianism is something which nineteenth century radicals had tried to tap into as a source of revolutionary potential, believing it be a popular manifestation of resistance to social oppression. As well as romanticising them as something exotic, they condescendingly viewed the sects as proof of a desire for social liberation among who they viewed as simple illiterate people, but without scientific knowledge expressed it in the form of religious dissent. There was the aim of transferring it into their own movement, but the attempt to link the dissent of 'common folk' with their own failed.

The professors knew where to find them and record their contact, but their students, who later faked it in the countryside during the Lavrov-inspired and very naive 'going to the people,' usually ended up getting arrested by the Tsarist police, at times with the help of suspicious peasants. A good person to read up on this is kind of stuff among the intelligentsia, is a historian of the time called Afanasy Shchapov.
 
Caught this for the first time on my new cheapo phone fm radio function. Was a brief piece about the terrors including a nicely indicative solzyenitzn quote about the likelihood of stalin hiding behind a gauze curtain while his former NKVD big nob was sentenced alongside others. Oriental despot was the term used. It then briefly.went on to sketch trotskys murder
will listen again tommorow.
 
The Black Ravens are outside.

black-ravens.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom