I was talking about Ruach ministries actually.
I was talking about Ruach ministries actually.
I have to confess - and this is not a troll - I would love to know what the long term effects of a riot would be. Nobody hurt, just flash cars torched and estate agents' windows put in. Would gentrification be put back much?
Lazy and wealthy with mortgage smaller than the rent on my spare room.
Insurance premiums will go up for the normal people living there maybe, making it harder for them to afford it and then moving out of the area. Allowing the landlords to claim, gentrify and expand.
Just like what happened last time.
Why have you got such a small mortgage?
I think it's some sort of scam involving exploiting immigrant workers or something like that.
It's the height and impracticality of them that makes me too lazy to reject M&S veg and walk over to the market.
Why have you got such a small mortgage?
I have to confess - and this is not a troll - I would love to know what the long term effects of a riot would be. Nobody hurt, just flash cars torched and estate agents' windows put in. Would gentrification be put back much?
well back in day that meant the good shops left Brixton, more tat shops appeared, increased fear in the streets, people scarred from how frightening it was, many house destroyed -good people lost their homes and livelihoods and property. innocent people getting mugged and raped, hey it could be you dragged out of the house and beaten up!
Yes, i remember both riots and they weren't funny. And even when there wasn't rioting, cars were burnt, stabbings muggings and murders happened, houses robbed, etc,etc....
well back in day that meant the good shops left Brixton, more tat shops appeared, increased fear in the streets, people scarred from how frightening it was, many house destroyed -good people lost their homes and livelihoods and property. innocent people getting mugged and raped, hey it could be you dragged out of the house and beaten up!
Yes, i remember both riots and they weren't funny. And even when there wasn't rioting, cars were burnt, stabbings muggings and murders happened, houses robbed, etc,etc....
To be honest my recollection of the riots is very different. I don't recall hearing much of innocent people being 'mugged and raped' at all, in fact there was a fair bit of solidarity on the streets. The mood after the first riot was triumphant, even tor a little one like me - the police had been given the lesson they had deserved, several of the most unpleasant pubs were razed, folks had new ill-gotten clothes and electronics goods for the big celebrations that followed. It was a community fighting back for once and winning to a large extent.
Yes, there was damage to some innocent property and the shops took a battering, some never to return. But the majority of the frustration was taken out on the police. Bear in mind that not one person died in the riots, no mean feat when molotov cocktails were being used and slightly less enlightened police tactics were in operation.
Whilst they were far from entirely positive events change did come as a result of the riots., And we'd be poorer without the legacy of that uprising.
The riot resulted in almost 300 police injuries and 65 serious civilian injuries; over a hundred vehicles were burned, including 56 police vehicles; almost 150 buildings were damaged, with thirty burned.
OK, that was a very wise post. I just worry about the Granville Arcade plans, the increased rents for market stalls, that sort of thing. Coldharbour Lane is one of my favourite streets in the world and the tarted up bit of Rushcroft Road now reeks of Barnes. If I was a developer I'd be determined to do that to the whole road. And then what? What if the shops on Coldharbour Lane get taken over by mobile phone companies or Gap or something. D Convenience store is having a tough time, Coffee@Max has closed, the Juice bar is always dead, Living has been boarded up for ages.
And my rent may be thought of as low by some, but I struggle to pay it. If Brixton gets a fraction more expensive I'll have to leave and go...where? It's the only bit of London I like.
change did come as a result of the riots., And we'd be poorer without the legacy of that uprising.
I do sympathise, but it's galling when all you hear is wankers (no one here of course) banging on about how we should endeavour to keep Brixton real. Really? Try growing up with only shitty schools on offer, on an estate police won't patrol, with nothing for young people to do, where it takes six weeks to get a doctors appointment.
That's nothing, I had to queue for 10 minutes at the deli the other day only to find they'd run out of prosciutto.
I do sympathise, but it's galling when all you hear is wankers (no one here of course) banging on about how we should endeavour to keep Brixton real. Really? Try growing up with only shitty schools on offer, on an estate police won't patrol, with nothing for young people to do, where it takes six weeks to get a doctors appointment.
Sorry if I'm coming across as an I've-faced-more-hardship-than-thou twat, but there are bonuses to so called gentrification.
Ach, as I said earlier the most vicious anti-gentrification types always tended to be well-bred incomers as well. There's a balance somewhere inbetween ever increasing chain stores/luxury apartments and the desire to raising anything new to the ground to defend 'propah' Brixton
The schools issue I sympathise with well. I escaped the shit schools early on, via scholarships an then 11-plus out of borough. I honestly don't think I'd have anywhere near the same qualifications had I not had a mother so willing to fight for a place miles away, nor believe that I'd have been a strong enough a character to succeed in spite of the poor resources.
My primary school was really good but secondry school was awful and did effect my qualifications. Plus there wasn't a great positive outlook from the teachers or careers advice. I think they thought that we wouldn't amount to anything.
On reflection that post does make me sound like a bit of a twat, BUT IT'S TRUE.
I'm not sure if realistically and long term a happy middle ground can be reached, but the pros of "bringing up the standard" (sorry) of an area outweigh the cons I think.
The thing is though, that trying to make, say, schools better by encouraging wealthier/middle class families to move into their catchment areas is kind of a perverse way to do things, because surely those middle class families who are good at writing letters to their councillor and so forth must be displacing the poorer families, as there's only so much housing to go around. So they might make the schools and crime rates and what have you "better" but what's the good in that for the people who have to move elsewhere, presumably to a different "bad" area with equally crappy schools.
The thing is though, that trying to make, say, schools better by encouraging wealthier/middle class families to move into their catchment areas is kind of a perverse way to do things, because surely those middle class families who are good at writing letters to their councillor and so forth must be displacing the poorer families, as there's only so much housing to go around. So they might make the schools and crime rates and what have you "better" but what's the good in that for the people who have to move elsewhere, presumably to a different "bad" area with equally crappy schools.