zoltan69 said:I aint got spkrs at work
wots he actually say - the gist of it ?
Ahh - thanks for explaining that.omlette said:he doesn't say "we shot the plane down", he's listing the bad guys.... "the people who bombed this, the people who attacked that..." and he says "the people who shot down the plane over Pennsylvania" instead of (presumably) "the people who hijacked the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania".
It's an interesting slip.
He's bumbling incoherently through the whole interview, so I really wouldn't start drawing any exciting conclusions.frogwoman said:thats very interesting, tbh ... not the kind of thing you get wrong ... kind of hard to forget that a plane was highjacked.
Not in the context of his mumbling interview, no.Jazzz said:But even for you that one must be pretty curious editor.
Tox06 said:I've never doubted it.
Idris2002 said:Is he actually drunk in the interview? I don't have time to look at the link.
yes, yes, yes, but Rumsfield let it slip in a rather tired and emotional-sounding interview, so that statement must override the rules of physics and prove the 'truth seekers' 100% correct.Andy the Don said:Had it been a missile strike the plane would have broken up in mid air. therefore the debris would have been spread across a wide area. It was not, it was located in the one area.
Jazzz said:"... imagine the kind of world we would face; if the people who bombed the mess hall in mosul, if the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennysylvania, attacked the Pentagon..."
All pretty clear. Interestingly though he does a bit of a double take over the word 'shot'.
He's talking about the USG folks!!!