Someone has already been and randomly planted a sapling which has been removedA ranger said he hopes it will grow back. I am not sure about that. They can grow a new sycamore tree in the same spot.
Possibly a bit of a stretch? I don't think his dispute was with the National Trust, although they own land nearby (but not the farm IIRC)Suspicion now seems to be that it was a local farmer [& ex-lumberjack] who had just been evicted from his home.
View attachment 393692Plankey Mill farmer evicted from life-long home after battle with landowners
Walter Renwick, 68, was born at Plankey Mill but has had to leave the property after a dispute with the landownerswww.chroniclelive.co.uk
If that’s the case then it’s the fault of landlords and the Catholic ChurchSuspicion now seems to be that it was a local farmer [& ex-lumberjack] who had just been evicted from his home.
View attachment 393692Plankey Mill farmer evicted from life-long home after battle with landowners
Walter Renwick, 68, was born at Plankey Mill but has had to leave the property after a dispute with the landownerswww.chroniclelive.co.uk
This is, with no exaggeration, the best joke I've heard all year.Just one more to identify and they'll have the tree fellers they're after.
Pretty much an episode of Father Ted, guest written by Dan Brown.If that’s the case then it’s the fault of landlords and the Catholic Church
According to the Guardian the expert lumberjack with a grievance against the Jesuits, landlords and the rest says he didn't do it. He's also now reported as being 69. He was only 68 in the first story. All this suspicion against entirely innocent expert lumberjacks must be very ageing.
Hadn't he already been evicted?The current top conspiracy theory doing the rounds is that Jesuits priests cut it down and framed him so he'd get taken away from their land.
After i had watched The Mission (DeNero and Ray McNally) i vowed never to trust Jesuits priests or Popes.The current top conspiracy theory doing the rounds is that Jesuits priests cut it down and framed him so he'd get taken away from their land.
Hadn't he already been evicted?
“the tree, which was planted in the late 1800s”. Is that true? It was planted, not self seeded, and it’s definitely late 19th Century?Update of sorts from the beeb
Sycamore Gap tree: Site plans are complicated, says MP
Discussions over the site are ongoing but the issue is not simple, Hexham MP Guy Opperman says.www.bbc.co.uk
yes, Guy, we all know that the situation is very complex ... but as yet there's no certain news from the police, plenty of rumours, of course.
1809 would be the late eighteen-noughties.“the tree, which was planted in the late 1800s”. Is that true? It was planted, not self seeded, and it’s definitely late 19th Century?
(pedantic point: I wish people would stop saying “late 1800s to mean 1899 or something”. It’s ambiguous. It could mean late in the first decade of the 19th Century, eg 1809, and therefore early 19th Century).
I mean, I disagree. We called the first decade of the 20th Century the nineteen hundreds.1809 would be the late eighteen-noughties.
I'm not wrong - it makes sense to me.I know people lost the plot with the millenium and started saying two thousand, but they were wrong then and they’re wrong now.
I thought it was Sasaferrato who was the ancient one. Isn't the whole century called the nineteen hundreds?I mean, I disagree. We called the first decade of the 20th Century the nineteen hundreds.