Fair enough, but all these articles make the point that the caste system is anomalous in Islam. Its re-appearance is newsworthy precisely because it's unusual.
AFAIK it's interpreted less as a ban on drinking, than a ban on whatever clouds your judgement or dizzies the mind - hence antihistamines are also avoided by some Muslims (the things you learn, hanging around pharmacies). Some Muslims would believe that khat, tobacco, cannabis, and opium are haram, others take the view that if they've been allowed to grow then surely a benevolent god wouldn't create something so harmful, therefore they're permitted in the right amount and the right situation.<snip> For example: Islam forbids alcohol (actually Islam doesn't forbid anything except idolatry, but Muslims are strongly advised not to booze). There's nothing superstitious about that is there? It's a rational matter. And so, translated out of the mythical vocabulary, is all the rest.
what's that link and why should i bother with it?
Special places and good meeting points are special, regardless of the current pervading beliefs, because they are. Have a look at a contour map and water supplies, then work out probable trade routes, then pick your prime locations, but let's keep anachronistic ley lines out of this, shall we?FACT: All the medieval churches in South Wales are built on leylines. This is indeed because they replaced pagan altars on the same sites. <snip>
Was he?Jimmy Saville was a Muslim?
That's news to me. What was his Arabic name?
It's meant to be unusual but it's really not.Fair enough, but all these articles make the point that the caste system is anomalous in Islam. Its re-appearance is newsworthy precisely because it's unusual.
I'm reading Francis Pryor's book Britain BC on the archaeology of very early Britain and this point keeps coming up in his descriptions ofa whole range of sites.Special places and good meeting points are special, regardless of the current pervading beliefs, because they are....
Mostly because cultures come and go but the basic needs for survival remain the same.I'm reading Francis Pryor's book Britain BC on the archaeology of very early Britain and this point keeps coming up in his descriptions ofa whole range of sites.
I think also because while cultures shift a place with some sort of significance that is constantly used/visited ends up adapting along with them - he points out that eg various phases of Stonehenge landscape have a very long history so that it was ancient by the time the stones we know got erected.Mostly because cultures come and go but the basic needs for survival remain the same.
so is Mithras based on Horus, or Horus based on Mithras? Because if you are saying Christmas is based on either simply because the dates are the same, then H&M must be based upon one or the other too.It's the official birthday of Mithras and also of Horus, your move.
precisely what Paisley and many other hardcore prods accuse catholics of doingCome to think of it, the way that Christians treat Jesus (and soem treat Mary and the saints) is also pretty close to idolatry at times.
before you show your ignorance again why not invest in a copy of 'the golden bough'?So you're a Woolwich supporter then? If something has a base in something else it still is that original thing. Which means you're a monkey. Or one of those sea things we evolved from.
And December 25th was chosen explicitly because it is NOT the solstice. It's near to it, but different.
A lot of Muslims would make the same accusation.precisely what Paisley and many other hardcore prods accuse catholics of doing
Neither. But, in case you didn't know, Isis concealed the baby Horus in a manger at one point.so it Mithras based on Horus, or Horus based on Mithras? Because if you are saying Christmas is based on either simply because the dates are the same, then H&M must be based upon one or the other too. <snip>
Um. How do you work out that dec 25 is nine months after the spring equinox?so it Mithras based on Horus, or Horus based on Mithras? Because if you are saying Christmas is based on either simply because the dates are the same, then H&M must be based upon one or the other too.
What that shows is the importance of the equinox in all these calendars, that is the thing that links them, the way the universe works. Which came before the other is all but irrelevant. No one (as far as I'm aware) thinks Mithras' or Horus' birthdays are based upon the others, so why must Christmas be? No one (again, afaik) claims Christmas is based on Horus, so it's only point here is to show the co-incidence of these dates.
Some do claim Christmas comes from Mithras (or, more specifically, Sol Invictus), but that's dubious as there is little evidence the Roman sun worshippers actually celebrated particularly on that date, but mainly because the key thing for the Christian is how December 25 is nine months after the spring equinox, and the supposed conception of Christ.
The German fertility Goddess was Ostara, who was associated with fertility of both humans and crops. Ostara mated with the solar god on the Spring Equinox and nine months later she gave birth to a child around the Winter Solstice at 21st/22nd of December.
god may be perfect but mary was carrying the child.Easter is also movable so Holy Week doesn't coincide with the Annunciation.
As for nine months, well, no, it is not precise biologically, but that didn't bother the early Christians, and as God is Perfect, Jesus' gestation would have gone perfectly, so - nine months. We all (well, nearly all) know it's a load of bollocks, but it's what they thought.
blame the early christians, not me.Um. How do you work out that dec 25 is nine months after the spring equinox?
there are obvious links between these disparate myths - they all go back to the central importance of equinox's (as stated earlier). Given the generally minimal impact of Germanic paganism upon christianity, its unlikely Ostara was the specific forebear of Easter, it is probably one of the various cognates that eventually turned into 'Easter'. But it is the equinox that is the key, not any particular later marking of it.And as ever, Christian mythology borrows from other traditions, as it does also with Easter and the story of rebirth and coming back from the dead...
Don't know about the reliability of this source... But then how reliable are yours?
Yeah but under god's direction, he wouldnt have let her do so if it wasn't going to be perfect.god may be perfect but mary was carrying the child.
so instead of booking her into a hospital or maternity unit he leaves her to find the last remaining manger in bethlehem in the middle of winter. not that fucking perfect is it.Yeah but under god's direction, he wouldnt have let her do so if it wasn't going to be perfect.
In other words, Christianity is just one of many traditions that end up with festivals in spring and midwinter. And if we don't celebrate any of the peculiarly Christian bits to do with the supposed life of Jesus that have become attached to these festivals, we're not very culturally Christian at all.But it is the equinox that is the key, not any particular later marking of it.
it was for his purposes, you are clearly trying to evaluate the past from a twenty-first century point of viewso instead of booking her into a hospital or maternity unit he leaves her to find the last remaining manger in bethlehem in the middle of winter. not that fucking perfect is it.
Yes you are. Context doesn't just mean what i think about things.In other words, Christianity is just one of many traditions that end up with festivals in spring and midwinter. And if we don't celebrate any of the peculiarly Christian bits to do with the supposed life of Jesus that have become attached to these festivals, we're not very culturally Christian at all.
so instead of booking her into a hospital or maternity unit he leaves her to find the last remaining manger in bethlehem in the middle of winter. not that fucking perfect is it.
Except you do make use of various 'Christian' aspects of it. December 25 today is a specifically Christian celebration, so if you feast on that day.... Also family and gift giving are not central to other, earlier, equinal celebrations, so they are clearly Christian based. And you do it in times and ways as prescribed by laws based upon the centrality of Christianity. So you dont really have much choice in the matterIn other words, Christianity is just one of many traditions that end up with festivals in spring and midwinter. And if we don't celebrate any of the peculiarly Christian bits to do with the supposed life of Jesus that have become attached to these festivals, we're not very culturally Christian at all.
The festivals would exist in some form anyway.Yes you are. Context doesn't just mean what i think about things.
not me who started going on about mary's perfect pregnancyit was for his purposes, you are clearly trying to evaluate the past from a twenty-first century point of view