belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
you are an islandAnd insisting on some residual 'cultural' Islam or Christianity or whatever is both denying people their own agency
you are an islandAnd insisting on some residual 'cultural' Islam or Christianity or whatever is both denying people their own agency
No. I take my holidays when others do, for instance. But that no more makes me 'culturally christian' than it does a Muslim whose children also take their holidays over Christmas and Easter because they live here. Reducing the idea of cultural identity to this renders it meaningless.you are an island
Of course not, cos you're so so specialNo. I take my holidays when others do, for instance. But that no more makes me 'culturally christian' than it does a Muslim whose children also take their holidays over Christmas and Easter because they live here. Reducing the idea of cultural identity to this renders it meaningless.
You get that someone leaving a faith doesn't destroy history or the faith of others right? And that their faith and that history still plays a role in society and in individual and collective socialisation? Because you seem to me, in a fit of enlightenment pique, to suggest that your individual choice does in fact destroy history and faith. Also, and this is important, you'll find the Council of ex-Mulsims forums and other places full of people who call themselves atheists but culturally muslim.Bit of clarity here, phil. If you don't consider yourself Muslim, then you're not. It's as simple as that. And insisting on some residual 'cultural' Islam or Christianity or whatever is both denying people their own agency - if they tell you they do not consider themselves 'culturally' any religion, you should take that seriously - and also being massively simplistic about how cultures and cultural identities form - they are about far more than any named religion.
The Council of ex-Mulsims put it well in their manifesto:
This stuff matters, and people insisting that others have some intrinsic 'muslimness' or 'christianness' about them that they cannot renounce is poisonous, ill-thought-out, dangerous thinking.
Bit of clarity here, phil. If you don't consider yourself Muslim, then you're not. It's as simple as that. And insisting on some residual 'cultural' Islam or Christianity or whatever is both denying people their own agency - if they tell you they do not consider themselves 'culturally' any religion, you should take that seriously - and also being massively simplistic about how cultures and cultural identities form - they are about far more than any named religion.
The Council of ex-Mulsims put it well in their manifesto:
This stuff matters, and people insisting that others have some intrinsic 'muslimness' or 'christianness' about them that they cannot renounce is poisonous, ill-thought-out, dangerous thinking.
atheists do not believe in god.
you'll find the Council of ex-Mulsims forums and other places full of people who call themselves atheists but culturally muslim.
neither, do try and keep upSo what are we discussing now, "religion" or this nosnsensical "god" concept that millions of priests must be biting their lips over because it's failed to make its presence felt even to them ?
as i said above people may be influenced by the cultural milieu in which they exist but you won't find a christian or muslim atheist as to be christian or muslim you have to believe in god.Nobody "doesn't believe in God," Fool. Self-declared atheists least of all.
You for example espouse a world-view that is manifestly formed by the Christianity you affect to despise. You are deus inversus incarnate.
I thought you'd read yer Nietzsche?
I now suggest you take a look at The End of the Affair by Grim Grin.
“I hate you, God. I hate you as though you actually exist.”
That's you that is.
it's always just phil.so it's just Phil then ?
as i said above people may be influenced by the cultural milieu in which they exist but you won't find a christian or muslim atheist as to be christian or muslim you have to believe in god.
So what are we discussing now, "religion" or this nosnsensical "god" concept that millions of priests must be biting their lips over because it's failed to make its presence felt even to them ?
if they're atheist then they are unlikely to hold with judaism.How about an atheist Jew?
but that doesn't stop someone from being an atheist jew.if they're atheist then they are unlikely to hold with judaism.
if they're atheist then they are unlikely to hold with judaism.
or even 'officially' jewish, what with it passing down the mothers side.But they will still consider themselves culturally Jewish.
Do you seriously not know this?
you have to believe in god.
did i say they didn't? you dozy twat.But they will still consider themselves culturally Jewish.
Do you seriously not know this?
let's see you prove the existence of god then.Everyone believes in God.
God is not like the Yeti or the Loch Ness Monster. He is not a creature whose existence can be determined empirically.
God is an idea, a concept. And concepts exist, and they determine people's behavior and thus the course of history. Concepts also make it possible for human beings to experience the world, and in this sense they create the world for us.
What you can't get over is the mythological terminology in which these ideas have been expressed. But as a devotee of Nietzsche, you really should know that popular religion is "picture thinking," designed to convey complex philosophical truths to illiterate people.
Thus Nietzsche calls Christianity "neo-Platonism for the masses." Which is exactly what it is.
So if you have a problem with it, there's no point in blubbing "but God doesn't exist where is He then show me a photo etc etc." That is stupid. If you have a problem with Christianity, you need to refute Plato.
Good luck with that.
didn't say it did. but don't let that get in your way.but that doesn't stop someone from being an atheist jew.
why did you bother responding to a post saying 'how about an atheist jew' then? you now admit your reply was completely and utterly pointless.didn't say it did. but don't let that get in your way.
as are the Loch Ness Monster and the Yeti. So now everyone believes in them too, by your logic.Everyone believes in God.
God is not like the Yeti or the Loch Ness Monster. He is not a creature whose existence can be determined empirically.
God is an idea, a concept. And concepts exist,
as are the Loch Ness Monster and the Yeti. So now everyone believes in them too, by your logic.
let me take this in easy stages.why did you bother responding to a post saying 'how about an atheist jew' then? you now admit your reply was completely and utterly pointless.
let me take this in easy stages.
jews are both the adherents of a faith and an ethnic community.
someone can be a member of the ethnic community and an atheist.
so you can be an atheist jew without holding with judaism.
we've covered this already.How about an atheist Muslim?