Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Release Lockerbie bomber Abdelbasset Ali al-Megrahi or not?

release al-Megrahi from prison or not?

  • al-Megrahi should die in a Scottish prison serving his sentence

    Votes: 61 37.4%
  • Transfer al-Megrahi to a Libyan jail to continue his sentence at home

    Votes: 19 11.7%
  • Release al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds

    Votes: 83 50.9%

  • Total voters
    163
An aside: but after WWII the allies made the Germans put "made in Germany" on their products so that people could know and presumably boycott as required. The thing was that "made in Germany" products were soon known as better quality and people far from being repelled, they were attracted to the "made in Germany" label.
 
There were some comments from & sentiments being expressed by Americans sitting near me at the Edinburgh Tattoo on Friday night that indicated quite a bit of displeasure
 
I wonder what the intersection of the set is between the people who sign up to that boycott Scotland website, and the 20-odd percent that have passports, or the 10% that actually leave the country?
 
You don't get compassionate release, do you?

It's become apparent that a lot of people don't get the whole concept of compassion - ''he didn't show the people on that plane compassion. Why should we show him any?''

Um, it's not a trade off*.






* Well it's not meant to be, depends which story you believe.
 
So we should let mass murderers go free?

If they were tried in Scotland, under Scottish law and they had a terminal illness that qualifies you for release, then yes.

It's all about respecting the laws of the country, no?

If the yanks are so concerned, why not have him tried in America? Why leave it to another country to exact your revenge?
 
If they were tried in Scotland, under Scottish law and they had a terminal illness that qualifies you for release, then yes.

It's all about respecting the laws of the country, no?

If the yanks are so concerned, why not have him tried in America? Why leave it to another country to exact your revenge?

I'm giving my opinion here, it's nothing to do with what the Americans want.
 
Americans didn't seem that bothered about terrorists when the IRA were rattling collection tins....funny that
 
If they are dying of cancer, yes.

At the end of the day just because they are cunts completely lacking in compassion doesn't mean we have to be.
Exactly. That he didn't show compassion to the people he murdered is one of the things that makes him a terrorist. I'd prefer we didn't behave like terrorists.

It's not as if Megrahi has been pardoned; he has gone home to die, and soon. As MacAskill said "It is terminal, final and irrevocable. He is going to die". What purpose is served by making his die in a Scottish prison? No good one.
 
Some interesting opinions, both pro and anti, in this Guardian (:eek:) piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/22/lockerbie-bomber-megrahi-release-debate

The requirements of compassion extend only, in international humanitarian law, to providing medical assistance and pain-killing drugs to treat his cancer and allowing family visits. But his crime against humanity was in law unforgiveable – that is why – such crimes have no time limits on prosecution and no provision for early release.

While we do need to punish there is something else in the human heart that should be as strong and that is mercy.

But in general terms, to err on the side of compassion is the mark of a society that one wants to live in.

But for securely convicted mass murderers, life imprisonment should mean exactly that, for all three purposes of punishment, protection of the public, and (if this ever works, which is questionable) deterrence.
 
Back
Top Bottom