Well you have no idea how many people are of the opinion that doing anything to a photo post-exposure is "cheating".Wow. This is just too easy
Well you have no idea how many people are of the opinion that doing anything to a photo post-exposure is "cheating".Wow. This is just too easy
I've got plenty of idea about that as it goes. It's a not infrequent subject of discussion in a lot of places.Well you have no idea how many people are of the opinion that doing anything to a photo post-exposure is "cheating".
Bungle, have you reached any conclusions about the people who put their lens hoods on backwards?
I am one of the hoodless too marty. Let us not hang our heads in shame, let us walk together. Hoodless. And proud!so, I don't own a camera, take pictures on my Samsung Galaxy S4 - which appears to lack a lens hood but those degenerates who put this hood thingie on backwards , can they still take pictures? can they still take good pictures ?
I could post my answer, but I don't want to get embroiled in another argument.
so, I don't own a camera, take pictures on my Samsung Galaxy S4 - which appears to lack a lens hood but those degenerates who put this hood thingie on backwards , can they still take pictures? can they still take good pictures ?
AmateursI am one of the hoodless too marty. Let us not hang our heads in shame, let us walk together. Hoodless. And proud!
What? You start a thread about a specific subject, and now you won't discuss it further or even just offer an opinion?I could post my answer, but I don't want to get embroiled in another argument.
We are degenerates on drugsAmateurs
We will lead the revolution , hoodless of the world, will you join us and smash the barricades of the lens hood on backwards dictatorship ?I am one of the hoodless too marty. Let us not hang our heads in shame, let us walk together. Hoodless. And proud!
WE ARE THE HOODLESS!!We will lead the revolution , hoodless of the world, will you join us and smash the barricades of the lens hood on backwards dictatorship ?
Dr_Herbz said:There's nowt wrong with camera phones... I took this with a Nokia N95 about 6 or 7 years ago.
I have the original somewhere and the quality was excellent, even back then, and they're much better now.
And Ken Rockwell is a twat.
Sad news. RIP. So he must a used a sepia camara?
You can't be this silly, can you?
'nuff said...you people...
No idea. It's purely snaps, and there's no doubt that the best photos it takes are the ones in massively bright light. I vaguely think it might be nice to see if there's a better camera app, but I'm very much in the novice amateur snapster league, so it's not that near the top of my priority list.What do you use to take photos with the S4? Since I got mine I've found it hard to take anything that's not blurry with the native app. Is there one with a bit of image stabilisation?
Ooh, now, there's a point. I wonder how Bungle's obsession with lens hoods might relate to his own self-perception in the trouser department? There could be all kinds of metaphors going on there...
Guess what? You can do that with the S4 too. Incredible, etc, etc.Trying hard to make sense of your f2.2 comment. With a real camera, you can shoot either aperture or shutter priority.
If "virtually anyone" can do it, then home come "virtually everyone" isn't an award winning photographer then? Anyone can pick up a paint brush and smear paint across a canvass, that doesn't mean anyone can create a painting worthy of hanging in the National Gallery.
LOL! Your knowledge of this is obviously zilch and you have no idea what it takes to produce a great photograph. I'm quite sure this is one thing at least that Ed and the others will back me up on.
Guess what? You can do that with the S4 too. Incredible, etc, etc.
And I bet we bunk the train.We are degenerates on drugs
ViolentPanda said:Was Judas Priest's "Breakin' the Law" playing in the background when you wrote this?