gentlegreen
I hummus, therefore I am ...
polio is close to ending - if it wasn't for some very extreme antivaxxers ...Smallpox did
polio is close to ending - if it wasn't for some very extreme antivaxxers ...Smallpox did
They've been doing genomic sequencing on a proportion of samples for a very long time. One of the resons it would have been better to have less cases every day would be that then we could have sequened a far higher proportion of them.so ordinarily the PCR spits out "positive or negative" and they don't pay attention to the distribution of markers ?
The cat is definitely out of the bag ... presumably to be confirmed by some sequencing of old samples ?
Well, that all sucks. But what's also going suck now is all the twats going 'Ohhh, so they've conveniently got another dangerous "variant" now and of course they'll be one next year and the year after that. Ohhh, how convenient'
My parents are 80 and active and when you reach that age the risk benefit analysis from isolating becomes complicated and definitely one for people to do themselves. I fully understand my dad wanting to have a social life and won't stand in his way.Deffo a good idea to have a thread dedicated to this one variant, IMHO.
I’m worried now about my 80+ parents, who after weathering the early part of the pandemic by shielding and allowing others to do shopping for them have, post vaccination, returned to going to the supermarket once a week, plus other shops.
The sooner we have confirmed info on how much Omicron defeats the current vaccine, the better, as even if I start lobbying them to isolate I know they‘re going to resist. Nothing was helped by the Daily Mail (their favourite source of propagandist disinformation) having the headline “Experts say jabs WILL work on variant” on the front page yesterday. Simultaneously technically correct and massively misleading, in the truest DM tradition.
Yeah, I understand their view, which is that something is going to kill them before too long, so they may as well keep doing the things they enjoy while they still can. Like you say, it’s complicated. I just don’t think they take decisions based on good info.My parents are 80 and active and when you reach that age the risk benefit analysis from isolating becomes complicated and definitely one for people to do themselves. I fully understand my dad wanting to have a social life and won't stand in his way.
My parents are in their 70s and and I know my dad's view is that he'll take his chances because he's had his life and it's not fair younger people should have their lives on hold to protect him. But of course, not everyone feels the same.My parents are 80 and active and when you reach that age the risk benefit analysis from isolating becomes complicated and definitely one for people to do themselves. I fully understand my dad wanting to have a social life and won't stand in his way.
Well, this is pretty alarming.
If that is true and Omicron also turns out to cause serious illness in the vaccinated then we are truly fucked, the quote of 80-90 people being positive gives me some hope that it has some incorrect info in it. (its either 80 or 90 or the writer doesnt know, so the writer may have other stuff wrong)
I've tried the find the mention of that number range in the story she links to (reuters)BIB, why do you think that? It could be any number between 80 & 90.
Viral genomes deduced from these 2 SARS-CoV-2‒positive cases differed only by 1 nt. Retrospective investigation, including closed-circuit television camera footage, confirmed that neither case-patient left their room during the quarantine period. No items were shared between rooms, and other persons did not enter either room. The only time the 2 quarantined persons opened their respective doors was to collect of food that was placed immediately outside each room door. The only other time they might have opened their doors would be for RT-PCRs, which were conducted in 3-day intervals. However, because these 2 case-patients arrived 1 day apart, it is unlikely that they would be tested on the same day. Airborne transmission across the corridor is the most probable mode of transmission.
Presumably they can’t rule out surface borne transmission from the food and utensils which were being delivered to their doors? Even if the people handling those items in the quarantine centre are being tested, there must be a supply chain which physically handles food before it arrives there?Probable Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in Quarantine Hotel, Hong Kong, China, November 2021
Probable Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in Quarantine Hotel, Hong Kong, Chinawwwnc.cdc.gov
I've tried the find the mention of that number range in the story she links to (reuters)
but can't find it, im not sure where that comes from
Xenon, got a link to when the party happened?
Probable Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in Quarantine Hotel, Hong Kong, China, November 2021
Probable Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in Quarantine Hotel, Hong Kong, Chinawwwnc.cdc.gov
Ah, as you may recall I've been waiting for any signs of recombination for ages, perhaps this is the first clear sign of such things.Fresh from the 'mutations' thread, for those who don't subscribe.
Omicron variant may have picked up a piece of common-cold virus
The Omicron variant of the virus that causes COVID-19 likely acquired at least one of its mutations by picking up a snippet of genetic material from another virus - possibly one that causes the common cold - present in the same infected cells, according to researchers.www.reuters.com
Let's hope but there's a bit of lag for hospitalisation. I guess the issue is that even if it is mild and hospitalises, say half as many people, if it infects 5 times as many then we're pretty fucked.The news reports on that super spreader incident also said simptoms were mild. No one of that lot has been hospitalised.
Maybe you missed the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 genomes of each patient, who arrived on different days, differed by a single nucleotide?heres another theory, number 2 picked it up in the airport terminal.
I don’t even know what that means tbh.Maybe you missed the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 genomes of each patient, who arrived on different days, differed by a single nucleotide?
The implication of such a small difference (the smallest possible) is that it is extremely likely that one infected the other.I don’t even know what that means tbh.
The implication of such a small difference (the smallest possible) is that it is extremely likely that one infected the other.