Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Omicron news


Dr Susan Hopkins, chief medical adviser for the UK Health Security Agency, said she expected to see an increase in the number of people in hospital with Omicron infection.
It is not clear if those people who are in hospital with Omicron are there because of the virus or for other reasons.
She said there had not been a report of a death from the variant in the UK yet, although she pointed out that it had only been identified two weeks ago. It is two weeks after infection that you would expect to see people admitted to hospital, with deaths coming after that.
 
anyone else getting those slow pangs of covid fear/anxiety. they had gone from my life for months. rearing up again. mainly around somehow sometime losing my job, and then everything will massively fall apart for me.

Why might you lose your job Moaner?
 
He says that previous waves haven't reached more than 30% of the population anywhere - is that true and is it particular to Covid?
There are problems giving a straightforward answer to that.

For example there is the question of how such things are measured and/or estimated. Its not going to be through routine testing of people for current infection, because there are massive undercounts in that data and testing was especially limited in many places in the first wave. So its going to be estimated via things like antibody testing of blood donors. And the samples may be biased in various ways as a result.

Its also going to vary depending on how much you zoom in, either on subsets of the population or by zooming into a narrower geographical area.

And of course there is the fact that most places had to take extreme measures to reduce the number of people getting infected, in order to stop hospitals being overwhelmed. But obviously there are variations on this theme, especially during the vaccine era where we've seen how many millions of people in the UK have shown up via testing as having caught the virus in the Delta wave over a substantial period of time. That level of infection has been considered tolerable due to the changed hospitalisation ratio that vaccines brought over this time period against the strain dominant at the time.

So when it comes to comparisons with other diseases, we have to take into account what mitigations against the disease were actually bothered with when it came to other diseases vs covid. And we also have to consider the lack of mass testing for most diseases in normal times, meaning most data about how many people were infected with other diseases are vague estimates or assumptions.

When it comes to Covid and your question, I suppose I would suggest studying Manaus as an example where a very large proportion of people were thought to have caught it in their first wave, and where there was a fair amount of reporting on this detail later once the hoped-for herd immunity in that area did not turn out to save them from future woe.

eg look at various detail here: Covid-19: Is Manaus the final nail in the coffin for natural herd immunity?
 
Also teuchter consider looking at the detail from seroprevalence studies from New York, eg:

Results: The seroprevalence among 45 367 participants was 23.6% (95% confidence interval, 23.2%-24.0%). High seroprevalence (>30%) was observed among black and Hispanic individuals, people from high poverty neighborhoods, and people in healthcare or essential worker industry sectors. COVID-19 symptom history was associated with seropositivity (adjusted relative risk, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 2.65-2.88). Other risk factors included sex, age, race/ethnicity, residential area, employment sector, working outside the home, contact with a COVID-19 case, obesity, and increasing numbers of household members.

 
anyone else getting those slow pangs of covid fear/anxiety. they had gone from my life for months. rearing up again. mainly around somehow sometime losing my job, and then everything will massively fall apart for me.
I worry about my job a bit, what I do can be done from anywhere in the world and for a lot cheaper too, this was the case pre Covie too tho'.
 
Another angle to consider teuchter is modelling of diseases, and attempts to ascertain what use things like R0 estimates are when making public health decisions. Because there is considered to be a relationship between things like R and the attack rate.

eg: Unraveling R0: Considerations for Public Health Applications

The overall attack rate, the percentage of individuals who will get sick during an outbreak in a given population, may be the one disease characteristic of most interest to public health authorities, and the attack rate is the characteristic that appears to be most plausibly predicted by using estimates of R0.

With that in mind, I doubt it is a good idea to go looking for overly simplistic assumptions about a single maximum potential attack rate for Covid, given large differences between variants. Although care should also be taken to appreciate the difference between R0 and other versions of R.
 
A little bit of early vaccine-status data for Omicron cases discovered in Denmark so far. I would want to be aware of far more details about their vaccination programme, vaccines used and schedule between doses, booster campaign etc, as well as details of demographics of Omicron cases in Denmark so far, before trying to apply any conclusions from this data to other countries.

Screenshot 2021-12-13 at 12.20.36.png

From a report at https://files.ssi.dk/covid19/omikron/statusrapport/rapport-omikronvarianten-12122021-k29d
 
popped into a bookshop at lunchtime and chatted to the owner about the virus for a bit. they were quite sure there'd not be a lockdown over this one. me, i think they might be too optimistic. certainly if we're looking at say 75-100k infections a day and a 1-2% hospitalisation rate i feel a lockdown's on the cards.
 
popped into a bookshop at lunchtime and chatted to the owner about the virus for a bit. they were quite sure there'd not be a lockdown over this one. me, i think they might be too optimistic. certainly if we're looking at say 75-100k infections a day and a 1-2% hospitalisation rate i feel a lockdown's on the cards.
One projection was a million cases by the end of the month then two million not long after that!! cant see how you cant have a lockdown , adn that from Sajid Javid!!

There should be one now of course, but just as last December, everything most be open so xmas trade can happen.

Id bet on a January lockdown
 
One projection was a million cases by the end of the month then two million not long after that!! cant see how you cant have a lockdown , adn that from Sajid Javid!!

There should be one now of course, but just as last December, everything most be open so xmas trade can happen.

Id bet on a January lockdown
yeh january suits me better than december - i hope spooks reading this can pass that up the ladder
 
the government dont care about the viruses opinon
this is when we came out of lockdown last year so as to "do xmas"
View attachment 300640

100% theyre doing the same thing again
"they" don't care, as long as you "spend, SpEnD ! SPEND !!!" in the lead up to the so-called festive period. That's hat their paymasters want to happen.

I know from a few years spent working in shops, almost 3/4 of turnover happens in the last 1/4 of the year [made up from the late October to Early January period].
 
I know from a few years spent working in shops, almost 3/4 of turnover happens in the last 1/4 of the year [made up from the late October to Early January period].
well exactly - some retailers loses money all year and make all profits over this periid
it would be a financial disaster to shut down the economy at this time of year, which also means jobs and livelihoods
i dont think its a straightforward call to make
but its clear their decisions are made to be popular (save xmas etc), to not spend state money, and to downplay risks that lead to this moment in first place - theres a lot more that could be done right now without shutting shops
 
It’s entirely expected and doesn’t change the outlook at all.
I don't think it's expected that a death would typically be one day after a hospital admission. It can happen, but it's not just the usual way of things.

Otoh, I don't think it's clear that the hospital admission was one day prior. It could have been, but it may have been somebody already admitted testing positive for omicron.
 
Last edited:
They are bound to go on about deaths especially at the moment to try to counteract some of the simplistic sentiments that may have built up as a result of the talk of it being mild.
 
I don't think it's expected that a death would typically be one day after a hospital admission. It can happen, but it's not just the usual way of things.

Otoh, I don't think it's clear that the hospital admission was one day prior. It could have been, but it may have been somebody already admitted testing positive for omicron.

Was it one day post admission? I hadn’t read that. All the hospitalisations tested positive before or on admission (ie it wasn’t somebody already admitted testing positive for omicron.)

What I meant was, hospitalisations and deaths from omicron are entirely expected and the fact that they’re happening shouldn’t change one’s assessment of the danger.
 
What I meant was, hospitalisations and deaths from omicron are entirely expected and the fact that they’re happening shouldn’t change one’s assessment of the danger.
Depends how far wide of the mark some peoples assessment of Omicron has been so far.
 
Glad we all got our boosters already.

The queues might be something.

Nobody can book at the moment because the whole system is borked by massive demand. Likely result of Johnson's 'massive acceleration' will therefore be, um, fewer people getting boosters.
 
Back
Top Bottom