Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
in those days york was but a fenced field.Admittedly it's been a while since I read the first book so I might be misremembering, but I thought York fight was on the walls rather than in a field?
in those days york was but a fenced field.Admittedly it's been a while since I read the first book so I might be misremembering, but I thought York fight was on the walls rather than in a field?
When you were a lad?in those days york was but a fenced field.
I thought the Kjartan/Sven bit was done pretty well, setting them up as enemies quite early on.It even had a baddie Viking with one eye like Kirk Douglas.
Nonsense I think but I'm no expert. Considering how much of a thing the shield wall is in the books hope they've thought through how they'll show it a bit better than that.How accurate was the tortoise shell shield defence the Vikings used, wasn't that a Roman army tactic? Not that it matters too much.
How accurate was the tortoise shell shield defence the Vikings used, wasn't that a Roman army tactic? Not that it matters too much.
BBC - History - Viking Weapons and WarfareIn preparation for battle the younger warriors would draw up in line, with their shields overlapping in a 'shield-wall' for better protection; their chiefs were well defended by a close bodyguard. The older veterans formed up in support behind them. Battle then began by throwing a spear over the enemy line to dedicate them to Odin, it is said, and this was followed by a shower of spears, arrows and other missiles.
That struck me as horribly wrong too, maybe if it was romano-britons pretending to still be the imperium....the rectangular Anglo-Saxon shields (umm, no)...
Hopefully some of the future battles will be a bit more epic. I'm interested to see how they portray SteappaAgree about the slightly underwhelming feel too, more Dr Who than epic.
Thought it was OK but Bebbanburh hardly looks impregnable and the topography does feature later. No dancing on the oars either
That struck me as horribly wrong too, maybe if it was romano-britons pretending to still be the imperium.
Agree about the slightly underwhelming feel too, more Dr Who than epic.
Probably got this off cornwell's other stuff rather than actual history but understood some of the successor Romano-British sub-Roman polities still did a bit of shonky reenactment style roman dress-up.Nah, rectangular shields disappeared in the late Roman army.
ETA Oh, I see, you mean the late Romans had already ditched them?Probably got this off cornwell's other stuff rather than actual history but understood some of the successor Romano-British sub-Roman polities still did a bit of shonky reenactment style roman dress-up.
Yeah, hopefully some of the bigger battles in the later books will be a bit more epicNon-epic is fine though. Even in the major battles forces were in the low thousands (well, so it was said last time I vaguely read something)... These are minor battles on the edge of things.
The whole Viking thing seemed predicated on twenty hard bastards in a boat showing up was a major force concentration most locales couldn't cope with.There were no huge battles in this period, even the Viking 'Great Heathen Army' consisted of less than a thousand men.
How accurate was the tortoise shell shield defence the Vikings used, wasn't that a Roman army tactic? Not that it matters too much.
Probably got this off cornwell's other stuff rather than actual history but understood some of the successor Romano-British sub-Roman polities still did a bit of shonky reenactment style roman dress-up.
Yeah, that was the setting for his Winter King books.the time period for that was a bit earlier.
basically romans leave - britons do stuff for a couple of hundred years - saxon and angle scum invade and conquer - saxon scum do stuff for a bit - the norse come in and do similar in the north
it was the period where britins do stuff that the roman legacy remained although chester was used by both saxons and norse as a fortified city