bubblesmcgrath
Well-Known Member
They weren't under Irish govt control, the nuns has these places run as private fiefs
State funded.
State inspected.
The Government cant deny involvement
They weren't under Irish govt control, the nuns has these places run as private fiefs
The 'Workhouses' became, laundries, asylums, orphanages, hospitals etc, is it beyond you to even 'click the link'!!, which states the history of these places.
State funded.
State inspected.
The Government cant deny involvement
The Irish government has bowed to pressure to set up an official inquiry into deaths and abuse at homes for unmarried mothers after it found 4,000 infants had been buried in unmarked graves at institutions where morality rates ran as high as 50 per cent.
The inquiry was announced with anger growing over official inaction in the face of revelations that infants had been buried in a mass grave behind a convent-run mother and baby home in Tuam, County Galway where 796 children died over a 30-year period.
...
In addition to the home in Tuam, so-called “little angel”* plots will be investigated at Sean Ross Abbey, Tipperary, Bessborough, Co Cork, and Castlepollard, Co Westmeath.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...o-deaths-of-inferior-sub-species-infants.html
The "history" is not the issue. Why do you think how this building was used 150 years ago is relevant to how the nuns treated babies in the 1960s?
Absolutely not. But managed and run by the nuns.
If a civil servant allowed a child to die from preventable disease or malnutrition I'd like to see them prosecuted and the state to take responsibilty.
Shall we talk about how the religious orders are declining to pay compensation for their victims?
As for religious orders refusing to pay compensation?
They'll have to pay.
Fuckem
Dr Frances Finnegan, author of Do Penance Or Perish: A Study of Magdalen Asylums in Ireland
You might recall a post from February of last year, following the publication of the McAleese Report, entitled A Question Of Sex, Class And Gender.
It was a transcript of a discussion on Tonight With Vincent Browne, involving Dr Finnegan – who gave evidence to the Inter-Departmental Committee, chaired by former Senator Martin McAleese, and which published the McAleese Report.
During the discussion, Dr Finnegan told of her struggle to get her book published.
It took her 21 years to write, she published the first edition of it herself in 2001 and then, in 2004, Oxford University Press published it and continues to do so.
Dr Finnegan was also the historical consultant for Steve Humphries’ documentary Sex In A Cold Climate, which was broadcast on Channel 4 in March, 1998.
RTÉ never broadcast the documentary until April 7 of last year – 15 years after it was originally aired.
After it was aired on Channel 4 in 1998, the Irish Times ran a piece by Dr Niall McElwee, who was then Course Director in Applied Social Studies at the Waterford Institute of Technology.
Dr McElwee is the co author of a 1997 book called Prostitution in Waterford City, part funded by the Good Shepherd Sisters.
The Documentary has been criticised for being unbalanced and ignoring the nuns’ side of the story – an extraordinary reaction to such a harrowing film. However, having worked with a huge variety of sources on the subject over a very long period, I can confirm that for more than a century, the women who ran these grim institutions have been given a very good press. A glance at any local newspaper item on the institutions, or any publication devoted to the Homes (or appealing for funds) will reveal that until fairly recently the nuns were regarded almost as saints – in contrast to the “evil sinners” they controlled. The purpose of the film, of course, was to capture the experience of the victims of the system – those people who have always been voiceless in the past. To the credit of the Documentary makers, the women found the courage to tell their stories, which were handled with such sensitivity and care.
The "history" is not the issue. Why do you think how this building was used 150 years ago is relevant to how the nuns treated babies in the 1960s?
Ireland’s move away from the Catholic Church began before the reports were released. Between 1974 and 2008, regular Mass attendance dropped by some 50 percent. The situation today highlights a problem that is looming for the Vatican, especially in the West, as the global sex-abuse crisis, coupled with the increasingly conservative rule and top-down control that have prevailed since the 1970s, is contributing to the departure of populations the church once considered foundational. “Ireland is a prime example of what the church is facing, because they made this island into a concentration camp where they could control everything,” Mark Patrick Hederman, abbot of Glenstal Abbey, a Benedictine monastery in County Limerick, told me. “And the control was really all about sex. They told you if you masturbated, it meant you were impure and had allowed the devil to work on you. Generations of people were crucified with guilt complexes. Now the game is up.
It was a continuing pattern, people where being mistreated in these places from there conception, 'the entire time'. It never ceased. The passage of time or who controlled the building does not take away from misery that was endured in this building the entire time they where opened!!
You really need to take time out and think about exactly what your trying to say.
Read the above link. And fuck off.
Getting high and mighty about govt failures to deal with the abuse ignores the culture of catholicism in Ireland at the time, and y'know the fact THAT THE NUNS and the PRIESTS WERE DOING THE ABUSE.
Getting high and mighty about the fact that the state didn't do more to prevent the abuse is like blaming the RSPCA for not doing more to stop puppy farms, instead of getting angry at puppy farms. And instead of puppies replace that with children. Idiot.
Read the above link. And fuck off.
Getting high and mighty about govt failures to deal with the abuse ignores the culture of catholicism in Ireland at the time, and y'know the fact THAT THE NUNS and the PRIESTS WERE DOING THE ABUSE.
Getting high and mighty about the fact that the state didn't do more to prevent the abuse is like blaming the RSPCA for not doing more to stop puppy farms, instead of getting angry at puppy farms. And instead of puppies replace that with children. Idiot.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/magazine/13Irish-t.html?pagewanted=2&hpw&_r=0
I think it's impossible to understate the enormous power of the church in Ireland even now. As it you simply must baptise your child if you want any options for their schooling. Even in sth dublin which basically west britain (a slur SF fling at anyone who disagrees with them, which to my mind means "fuck the fucking church).
A friend spent a 3 month plus term at a addiction center in Ireland which has 2:1 relationship between pray and y'know therapy.
I think I'm trying to say you're a apologist for cunts you fucking wanker.
You're basically trying to say "hey in the 1850s children were being abused in workhouses ergo what occured in places like tuam in the 1960s is some how mitigated.
The principal of my primary school a christian brother was moved from dublin to cork, before finally getting a decade long sentence on a sample count of 58 sexual assaults. He was moved by the hierarchy from my school to another when he was in danger of being exposed. He spent five years in cork getting free reign assaulting more children after getting found at in my school.
But hey lets blame the state for not having a good enough supervision of the brothers. Fuck personal responsibility, fuck the fact that they considered themselves above the law.
So fuck the fuck off.
The principal of my primary school a christian brother was moved from dublin to cork, before finally getting a decade long sentence on a sample count of 58 sexual assaults. He was moved by the hierarchy from my school to another when he was in danger of being exposed. He spent five years in cork getting free reign assaulting more children after getting found at in my school.
But hey lets blame the state for not having a good enough supervision of the brothers. Fuck personal responsibility, fuck the fact that they considered themselves above the law.
So fuck the fuck off.
Should have beat the living shit out of him......that's what my dad did to a Christian brother and he was only 12 yeats of age.
People knew these shits were abusing. Why didnt they stop them? Parents knew. Whatvthe fuck was wrong with irish people that they didnt beat the shite out of the Christian brothers?????
Yeah so you've basically exposed the fact that that you are fucking clueless about the power of the church in Ireland at the time.
Fuckitty bye bye, piss the fuck off and dont the door kick you in the arse when piss off this thread cunty mac fuck shit.
And if
Are you denying it was British PM William Pitts idea to build 'Maynooth Seminary'?
It's alright when your blaming 'backward Ireland' for these 'ill's', but 'gawd' forbid we try and get to the bottom of the social and economic reasons to how these homes came about!!!
Did it stop in 1922 then?
Civil war erupted. Leaving more people in abject poverty...and don't forget the government had sent over the black and tans, many if whom were ex cons let out for the purpose of squashing the irish rebels.
They killed plenty innocents too. Life was utterly shit....and remained so for a long time.
You need to read a decent history of Ireland before saying that things should have been better.
Nobody had anything.
Infant mortality rates were much higher than in the uk....right up to the 60's.
It wasn't going to suddenly improve post 1922... mostly because the state had been left with nothing....
"I have always felt a certain horror of political economists since I heard one of them say he feared the famine of 1848 in Ireland would not kill more than a million people, and that would scarcely be enough to do any good. (Benjamin Jowett, referring to Nassau Senior, economic adviser, 1848)"
Nothing was done.
Absolutely nothing.
The schools in uk should teach the history of British rule .... the truth that is.
"We are worked harder and worse treated than the slaves in the colonies. I understand that they are taken care of by their masters when they are sick or old. When we are sick, we must die on the road, if the neighbors do not help us. When we are old, we must go out to beg, if the young ones cannot help us, and that will soon happen with us all; we are getting worse and worse every day, and the landlords are kicking us out of every little holding we have. God knows what will happen to this country! (James McMahon, a labourer from County Clare, 1834)."
Tell that to the 1,500,000 who starved to death while food left Ireland for the UK.
Tell that to the 2,000,000 who left ireland in search of a better life and a third died en route.
The British government knew exactly what they were doing.
Or, at least, your truth - the truth where everything is always someone else's fault.
The knew what they were doing, but while "exactly" lends volume to your claim, it doesn't lend accuracy. Ireland wasn't micro-managed, so "exact" knowledge would have been impossible.
Did the British state know what was happening, and do nothing practical to stop it - yes.
Did they know "exactly" what was happening - no.
They saw something happening, and took advantage of it, and sadly, given the philosophy of the time, those who could not help themselves were somehow seen as unworthy of aid (a philosophy being slowly reintroduced in Britain).