A reporter is not a journalist.
Yes they are in one definition of the word. The definition we happen to be discussing, as it happens.
A reporter is not a journalist.
A reporter is not a journalist.
As I have said before, I was there to document, if the protester did not cover his face, that's his fault not mine, the police were filming the whole thing as well, if he is stupid enough to do it in the first place without covering his face, what does he expect?
Believe me, I have been in the "sharp end of these situations far far more than you. What you are calling for amounts to a demand for censorship nothing less. Fuck you. You don't get to tell me what I can see or photograph or record. If we follow your logic we would have no footage of the poll tax riots, miners strike, greece, italy, the list goes on. We would have only heavily edited and heavily censored images of blacked out faces. That's utterly self defeating. Here is an idea. Wear a fucking mask.
I seldom see people back down anywhere. I take my hat off to you (if I was wearing one).
He changed stance btw.
I seldom see people back down anywhere. I take my hat off to you (if I was wearing one).
http://i.imgur.com/xFQY8.jpg
Checking back, it's clear you're correct and that I was mistaken in lumping you in with the usual suspects. I apologise. I'm glad that you're supporting the protests.
I can also echo a couple of other posts above, everyone I've spoken to over the last few days have broadly been in support of the students over the actual demo, even though some actually support the government's policy, and have taken positions between questioning and totally condemning the police operation.
A journo on anyone's side, is not a genuine journo.
'home goal'? What's that?
Now I don't want a situation where we are attacking journos and breaking cameras.
as opposed to vandalising public property/monuments and attacking pensioners.