Yet another sandblasting twattery - fucking awfulAnd, as I said over there, that brickwork is going to look lovely after a good clean
Dear World,
It is with a huge amount of sadness that we announce Cable has closed with immediate effect.
We have been forced to close following two years of ongoing legal battles with Network Rail, who took possession of the venue this morning with an entry order, putting us out of business and leaving our 70 staff without jobs. This is due to them allegedly requiring the space back for the redevelopment of London Bridge station. It is an utterly devastating blow to what is a much loved, hugely successful, well respected music venue and media business.
This is not only a huge loss to the loyal fans and staff of Cable, but to London's clubbing community as a whole. With enormous pride, we delivered the very best talent in an environment that upheld the history of the early SE1 rave scene and supported as many musical styles as possible.
We are obviously devastated and still in shock by the news and know there will be questions. As you can appreciate, there is much work to be done and many arrangements to be made behind the scenes. A full press release will follow.
If you are presently a ticket holder for an event that was scheduled to take place at Cable, please do not worry - further information will follow in due course.
Our sincerest thanks,
The Cable Team x
---------------
We have closed with immediate effect: official statement
More info: http://bit.ly/wehaveclosed
— at Cable Club.
Here's a video of the sad event.Don't know the background to it to comment either way on the legalities of this, but shame to see yet another venue gone.
Oh boo-fucking-hoo. They've known about it for years and every other business has already been shut there. If they were dismayed by anything, they've got to be some of the biggest idiots going.Here's a video of the sad event.
Oh boo-fucking-hoo. They've known about it for years and every other business has already been shut there. If they were dismayed by anything, they've got to be some of the biggest idiots going.
did you watch the video? They say they were told they wouldnt be affected - cable only opened a few years ago, by which time the plans wouldve been well established. When Network Rail bods are asked about that on camera they refuse to answer.Oh boo-fucking-hoo. They've known about it for years and every other business has already been shut there. If they were dismayed by anything, they've got to be some of the biggest idiots going.
i dont know but when a big project like the olympics or whatnot is happening things seem to happen at different speeds it seems to meI've not been to Cable and I sympathise with them having to close in that way but I would be interested to know what was in their lease. I wouldn't have thought Railtrack could have obtained a warrant and taken possession that way unless they had a right to do so?
I did, and while whoever told them they wouldn't be affected (a single person responsible, I'll bet) has a lot to answer for, the fact is that any cursory reading of the plans shows that any business under the arches had a very high likelihood of being asked to get out. If they had a leg to stand on, the lawyers would be all over it. Every other business that's been moved out had warning well in excess of statutory requirements.did you watch the video? They say they were told they wouldnt be affected - cable only opened a few years ago, by which time the plans wouldve been well established. When Network Rail bods are asked about that on camera they refuse to answer.
No idea what happened but it does sound like Network Rail went back on their word and then forced a closure on them late in the day. Its not unreasonable to think that the management wouldnt have put all that financial investment in if they knew it was just for a limited time...maybe they would, either way it sounds like they were fucked about.
This makes for fascinating reading. I don't know if the level of trouble is that unusual. Could there have been collusion between NR and Southwark Council ?
This makes for fascinating reading. I don't know if the level of trouble is that unusual. Could there have been collusion between NR and Southwark Council ?
That video is annoying as Cable never explain why it led to such a dramatic possession order.
Reading the supporting docs on the licence review there were 51 articulate objections from folks around Bermondsey St, I wonder if it actually got it's licence renewed? Sounds fairly wild on sat/sunday am. With the station redevelopment at least that it is day time disruption for residents.
The important aspect of this which nobody has mentioned yet is that the Cable Club premises were entered by Network Rail under the terms of a compulsory purchase order ("CPO"). This is made clear by the notices on the outside of the premises. The process for obtaining and enforcing a CPO are lengthy and where contested usually involve a public inquiry. It is likely that Cable will have known for a long time that this was coming. (In fact their own website refers to 2 years of legal battles). This is not a sudden move but one which was known about years ago. It also tends to explain why there have been recent problems with the venue. They knew they were on the way out so relaxed their management of their clientele in order to make as much money as they could before they were forced to close. Good riddance in my view.
From a poster on the SE1 forum, another interpretation
Part of the old station roof has found a new home