Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Live! Falcon Heavy, world's most powerful rocket, maiden flight

To link with my post above. Hear on BBC complaints about the problem with captialism is the money ends up with the profits... Which to me misses the number... Capitism is the take a punt.. if it comes in.. quids in the benefit to those who take the risk. The alternative Command based lacks the scope to take variety of punts like always backing the favourite when the ground breaking will always be left field. That said having explored both Cuba and the Philippines (a good compare and contrast) your Mean lot is probably better in Cuba... But in terms of pushing things forward, and we have to coz of population overshoot... The spread betting of capitism works


Other we hold hands in symbolism on the ISS and watch as we hit the edge of the petri dish..


Capitalism needs a tweak in favour of invested labour, but it beats command economy

One of (if not) the biggest drivers of technological advances is warfare. Presumably you argue in favour of that also? :rolleyes:
 
One of (if not) the biggest drivers of technological advances is warfare. Presumably you argue in favour of that also? :rolleyes:

Nobody has to be in favour of it, but be wasteful not to take advantages of the technological advances it provides.

No different from taking advantage now of the high speed internet developed primarily to service the porn download industry in its infancy :)
 
I've been thinking today what has disgusted me about the car thing...maybe im just a grumpy git, but i think there is a reason why...and I think the reason is because its like an advert... in fact its not like an advert, it is an advert. There's his product floating in space, just like in a cgi advert... theres the cool association-making (with Hitch-hikers), just like in an advert...there's the appropriation of a once counter-cultural bit of music providing a soundtrack to his product, just like in an advert... when he's not sweating his employees and suppressing trade unions he is ultimately in the business of flogging cars, and he's generated an incredible amount of awareness in them around the world thanks to this viral stunt advert.

I know this isnt the exact same thing but when humans sent this off into space I could get behind that sentiment:
welcome-interstellar-space-640x360.jpg

Theres a sense of respect and reverence for space which goes along with that.

I think Mars missions are beyond stupid, and moon missions, long ago done and dusted are now also redundant, but Im not against space science. And I like the international nature of the space station - this idea that we may be fucking the earth up royally, but in space there's some attempt amongst many scientists to rise above the way states play out their shitty politics and raise science above those politics. But with the way Musk has gone about this it seems to shit on all of that. What I see is Musks ego, Musks products, Musks share price.

When ET finds Voyager he’ll be like, “Oh, they sent us a frisbee, fab. Next time send us something useful, like a car.”

This respect and reverence for space, I do get where you’re coming from, but if we are to ever move on from space being elitist we have to normalise it, sending up a second hand motor has done just that.
 
Apparently the final burn was more powerful than expected, and the car will now have an aphelion that reaches as far out as the asteroid belt.
That turns out to have been a miscalculation on the part of SpaceX. It seems the injection burn was run till empty but initial post-burn analysis was wrong. You can stop worrying about it hitting any asteroids (and it still won’t impact Mars).

The Roadster+upper stage are now in a heliocentric orbit of 0.9 AU by 1.7 AU, so only just nudging past Mars (will pass about 100 million km from the red planet in July) and not into the asteroid belt (which is located at 2-3 AU), reaching aphelion in November. It will return to the vicinity of Earth in 2021, 2026, 2031, 2039.

The closest it gets to Mars in coming years is a distant 7 million km on 8 Oct 2020. The closest to Earth is 45 million km in March 2021.
 
Been reading a lot about Elon Musk since the thread started.
He's so "out of the box" he's potentially going to change the world in terms of the move away from fossil fuels.
The idea that the grid scale solar energy batteries developed by Tesla could replace the electricity grid .. is nothing short of genius and has already revolutionised and saved lives and communities.
 
Thanks for your opinion. Perhaps you might wonder why it's out of step with hundreds of years of successful product launches that have also harnessed publicity, gimmicks, showbiz and glitz?

I'd refer to my post #275 - And I don't remember the Apollo missions having that much outside of science going on, (although I was only 4 at the time - and goggle-eyed at the whole thing) the car on the moon was functional and had a purpose, the golf was daft but towards the end.
 
Last edited:
You seriously think this is going to "filter down to the masses"?

Yes .. everything eventually filters down over time.
My grandparents would never have been able to afford to fly to another country. Now...we can buy a ticket to fly to another country for £50.
Nobody would have believed that could happen 60 years ago let alone 100 years ago.
 
One of (if not) the biggest drivers of technological advances is warfare. Presumably you argue in favour of that also? :rolleyes:
That is true. But war for wars sake would be a nuts idea. I do think though there have historically been 'necessary' wars.

It would also be wrong for me to advocate for wars per say as were one to break out I've got the equivalent of a note from my Mum excusing me from PE
 
And I don't remember the Apollo missions having that much outside of science going on, the car on the moon was functional and had a purpose, the golf was daft but towards the end.
Apollo produced quite a science return, though of course most of which today could be done robotically, to a more thorough degree, producing far more data.

The golf was an improvised escapade by one of the astronauts. They all had a little fun and let off steam in odd fashions. Some took private items and left them there.


A drawing of a cock and balls/the artist’s initials/ um, a ‘spaceship’ by a certain A Warhol was also left on the Moon…
moon-museum.jpg

(ceramic chip attached to one of the legs of the Apollo 12 lander Intrepid by a technician, ‘John F.’, along with other art).
 
Last edited:
Yes .. everything eventually filters down over time.

Firstly, no it doesn’t. Not everything.

Secondly, I don’t think you have factored in the vast amounts of energy required to get a very large number of people out of the gravity well. Or the associated environmental costs.
We’re well in the red on that score re: air travel in any case.

£50 is the price of the air travel ticket, but that’s not really the *cost*.
 
Last edited:
Yes .. everything eventually filters down over time.
My grandparents would never have been able to afford to fly to another country. Now...we can buy a ticket to fly to another country for £50.
Nobody would have believed that could happen 60 years ago let alone 100 years ago.
Not sure thats really the same thing...curious what urban scientists think, but far as i understand at the moment to go to space requires massive amounts of fuel and also physical preparation to handle the conditions of being in space...we're no closer to a breakthrough that would change any of that....looooong way away for that

THeres that space elevator idea though, thats quite interesting.
 
Not sure thats really the same thing...curious what urban scientists think, but far as i understand at the moment to go to space requires massive amounts of fuel and also physical preparation to handle the conditions of being in space...we're no closer to a breakthrough that would change any of that....looooong way away for that

THeres that space elevator idea though, thats quite interesting.

I was talking about the tech used filtering down into everyday life......not common man spacewalking. :)
 
I was talking about the tech used filtering down into everyday life......not common man spacewalking. :)

Was there any fundamentally new tech involved with this launch? It looked to me largely like a clever application of stuff we use all the time.
 
You seriously think this is going to "filter down to the masses"?

Firstly, no it doesn’t.
Secondly, I don’t think you have any concept of the amounts of energy required to get a very large number of people out of the gravity well. Or the associated environmental costs.
We’re well in the red on that score re: air travel in any case.


8ball stood in Kittyhawk December 1903 - "that's never gonna catch on, far too many hurdles to overcome. Any idea of the amounts of energy required to get a very large number of people off the ground..?"
 
Was there any fundamentally new tech involved with this launch? It looked to me largely like a clever application of stuff we use all the time.
lol yes i watched an 8 minute rocket launch and landing and was immediatly able to indentify all the specific tech used on the project
 
8ball stood in Kittyhawk December 1903 - "that's never gonna catch on, far too many hurdles to overcome. Any idea of the amounts of energy required to get a very large number of people off the ground..?"

Get back to me when you’ve finished that Dyson Sphere and we’ll see about moving on the mass space travel front.
 
Back
Top Bottom