To link with my post above. Hear on BBC complaints about the problem with captialism is the money ends up with the profits... Which to me misses the number... Capitism is the take a punt.. if it comes in.. quids in the benefit to those who take the risk. The alternative Command based lacks the scope to take variety of punts like always backing the favourite when the ground breaking will always be left field. That said having explored both Cuba and the Philippines (a good compare and contrast) your Mean lot is probably better in Cuba... But in terms of pushing things forward, and we have to coz of population overshoot... The spread betting of capitism works
Other we hold hands in symbolism on the ISS and watch as we hit the edge of the petri dish..
Capitalism needs a tweak in favour of invested labour, but it beats command economy
One of (if not) the biggest drivers of technological advances is warfare. Presumably you argue in favour of that also?