I'll quote:
You mistake characterisation for interpretation when I call this "writing people off." It's a subtle distinction, but I'm sure you will get it.
Okay, fair call, i can see the difference between the two. But what about if i tell you that i was simply making observations and writing them down? And part of my observation comes not just from observing others, but observing myself. I may relate now that i am mostly alive etc etc, but what you don't get from my posts is what i was like before.
So there's two things here: firstly i'm making a non-judgmental observation, and secondly part of that observation process is self-observation.
If people are the living dead, and it's only about degrees - no-one is always living dead, no-one is always fully alive - and frequency of states of being, then by making the observation, awareness is possibly increased to the extent that people can make changes that lead to a better appreciation of life.
I thought that's what life was mostly all about, trying to enjoy it the most we can, with the help or hindrance of others. Whether i personally am a help or hindrance is for others to decide, but if i keep quiet it's unlikely i can be either.
Life may be a manifestation of the universe, but i'm arguing that that's not the necessary condition, just a first requisite. Awareness to escape the 'living dead' state of being is the real condition for LIFE.