Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Life after the SWP?

Which is when it ( the SWP to be) was at one of its most dynamic periods. ....

The rather more conventionally Leninist/Trotskyist IMG (and Fourth International elsewhere in Europe and in the USA) was also dynamic and significant at that time, leading the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign for instance. The popular image of the massive mobilisations against the war is the rather more dynamic Tariq Ali, rather than the somewhat staider Tony Cliff or Ted Grant. But the largest group on the left by a long way, and indeed in the working class movement, was still the ultra-sectarian ultra-orthodox Socialist Labour League, which could easily get 10,000+ to its rallies into the early 1970s.
 
If the 60s IS/SWP was so anti-leninist why did it adopt a version of 'democratic centralism' as early as 1968?

It illustrates the point I was making. The changes that were introduced were, in part, a response to the events of May '68. At the time of the most significant revolutionary upheaval of the post-war period, the paper was still called "Labour Worker" and the IS was a federalist organisation with a libertarian mode of organisation (Cliff famously modelled it on Luxembourg, rather than Lenin at the time).

However while presented as a 'turn to Lenin', it was done largely for pragmatic reasons (to be more effective) it did not represent the wholesale adoption of the Leninist model of party organisation (something IS/SWP has never done). Martin Shaw, a dissident who left in the 1970s, claims that of the leadership only Harman argued a full democratic centralist regime at the time and that in 1968 Cliff did not see it as creating a Leninist organisation.

The Matgamna group ('Workers Fight') was still able to operate as a semi-autonomous entrist group for several further years. It was not until 1973-74 that the changes were consolidated into the structures we see today.
 
That Shaw one is a direct reply to the first two parts of Ian Birrchall's (who alos wrote the bit saying the SWP journal is the best journal in the world that NWM bigs up above) The smallest Mass party in the World - Birchall's reply is here. I know you know this already but it might be useful to point out the full picture fo the debate to others trying to make sense of todays 'crumble'.
 
Isn't it all a bit academic? The swp is a leninist party now. And Harman's "commission to report on the working of the party’s democratic structures " isn't designed to change that basic fact, rather to oil the wheels of democratic centralism
 
That Shaw one is a direct reply to the first two parts of Ian Birrchall's (who alos wrote the bit saying the SWP journal is the best journal in the world that NWM bigs up above) The smallest Mass party in the World - Birchall's reply is here. I know you know this already but it might be useful to point out the full picture fo the debate to others trying to make sense of todays 'crumble'.

Thanks for that - couldn't find it on line meself... did link to the original Birchall pamphlet though.
http://www.marxists.de/intsoctend/birchall/index.htm
 
This is an interesting thread to have dragged from the Urban 75 basement archive store. Interesting to see what everyone was predicting back in 2008 compared to what has happened. The predicted "final thrashings" of the SWP have indeed turned out to be VERY prolonged- but then those of the WRP were long and embarassing too. Can anyone really doubt that the SWP is now in its "death-rattle stage " though - even if that is likely to be a painful stage of expulsion-wracked madness and delusion, many more years long ?

Equally interesting to see the utterly mistaken illusions those all-knowing critics of all things Socialist, Marxist or Trotskyist, like the 39th Step, had in the"unstoppable" political growth model of the BNP back in those ancient 2008 days, before the BNP also spectacularly splintered and crashed to earth, as the demands of the post 2008 Crisis showed that "community-focussed bigotry and petty nationalism lite" politics also wasn't sufficient to break the current mould of UK politics - not yet anyway:

eg, The 39th Step's predictive wisdom in Dec 2008:
"The revo left groups will survive , preserved in the aspic of 1917/1968 ,albeit smaller and more and more pushed to the margins even further from the working class. The SWP isn't going to collapse and disappear allowing some imagined non Bolshevik tradition to flourish. In that sense the SWP isn't the problem its the failure of the non Bolshevik left to actually put its time and effort into a pro working class project, a sort of left wing BNP".

Maybe deleting " left wing BNP" and citing "Syriza" as a potentially useful new model for the radical Left would make the above quote stack up more believably today. (There is of course no genuine, progressive, "left wing version of the BNP" in any meaningful sense. The "Left wing" version of a fascist or neo fascist party is simply a form of radical , nominally "anti-capitalist" "Strasserism" , ie, building an opportunist political movement on the capitalist- ideology-soaked bigotry of some sections of the poor White Working Class segment of the wider Working Class . Such a movement, divorced from specifically internationalist Socialist politics, is always reactionery). Can't see people like 39th Step doing that particular "reality update" though - as it would require taking on board radical socialist politics again as the core of any such new mass movement.
 
It is certainly interesting to see what people said back then.

...and I stand by my "the SWP is finished" from four years ago. The current goings on just confirm it's death as a prolonged WRP style exit complete with their very own sexual abuse scandal rather than one of the slightly more dignified demises they could've had.

Wonder how Fisher_Gate 's new revolutionary org is going?
 
The revo left groups will survive , preserved in the aspic of 1917/1968 ,albeit smaller and more and more pushed to the margins even further from the working class. The SWP isn't going to collapse and disappear allowing some imagined non Bolshevik tradition to flourish. In that sense the SWP isn't the problem its the failure of the non Bolshevik left to actually put its time and effort into a pro working class project, a sort of left wing BNP".

What was wrong with that?

The depressing thing about the BNPs present state is that none of it is of 'radical socialist politics ' making what so ever. 'radical socialist politics' hasn't even been able to claim any of the demise of the BNP for its CV. Neither has 'radical socialist politics' filled the gap that the BNP have left, instead its been filled by UKIP and Labour.

For a bloke who left the SWP in the 1980s all you seem to want is an SWP without the SWP or some 'radical socialist' swamp that you can occasionally wallow in. Despite occasionally waving the beacon of radical socialist politics to steer people away from an IWCA type approach you haven't joined any radical socialist grouping yourself. Some confidence you have in that solution?
 
So nothing!
It's not the actions of the Left (of whatever stripe) that really matters. It's the actions of the class.
teaching your granny to suck eggs mate, might be a better use of your time.

The point is, anarchists suggestions of 'organisational' models have achieved nothing, absolutely nothing in the UK, as your response shows. You cannot point to one single thing .

Socialists on the other hand, have initiated working class action on some things , not enough, but some things. :(


ETA I use the term of organisation very loosely . they couldn't organise a squabble in a child's crèche . well Maybe. :D
 
Socialists on the other hand, have initiated working class action on some things , not enough, but some things. :(
fuck me, what a diabolically weak claim.

The idea that anarchists have never 'initiated working class action on some things' in the UK is simply laughable. but then, its an rmp3 argument, so that is hardly surprising.
 
fuck me, what a diabolically weak claim.

The idea that anarchists have never 'initiated working class action on some things' in the UK is simply laughable. but then, its an rmp3 argument, so that is hardly surprising.
chilango offered nothing, neither have any others. And despite intendedly provocative statements, still none are pointed to. The ball remains firmly in their court.



Diabolically weak, as has been the working class movement for a long long, too long a time. :-(
 
Back
Top Bottom