Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Libertarians

libertarians.jpg
 
This was student exuberance - the serious people like Adam Smith Institute knew it was dumb because there would be so few supporters.

The Adam Smith Institute held a party a few months later to celebrate the budget

Nice snap here - free marketer over women's bodies Peter Stringfellow alongside Adam Smith Institute executive Eamonn Butler.
312824_10150292448449010_1751874_n.jpg


Stringfellow has suggested that he might stand against Clegg in the next election in Sheffield Hallam. Bizarre.
 
Well they are libertarians, were you expecting them to understand what they're talking about? ;)

Good point. :oops:

This was student exuberance - the serious people like Adam Smith Institute knew it was dumb because there would be so few supporters.

Very Serious People, as Paul Krugman characterises such idiots. I do wonder how many people who mindlessly chant Adam Smith's name - most of the institute that bears his name included - have ever actually read anything by him, though. Well, aside from a few carefully selected passages from The Wealth of Nations.
 
Independent I think

UKIP were interested for a while



Westminster Conservative Council regulating parking in one of the most densely crowded business districts in Europe ... socialists.
 
So what is the current relationship between ukip and these freaks? Are they on fringe, a distinct platform or embedded in powerful positions?
 
Also available in socialism.
trotsky_is_my_homeboy_by_bananafish-jpg.31715

The Cyrillic for G is the wrong way round. O is Church Slavonic rather than the Cyrillic for F being altered? The Y is actually U, what looks like a 3 is actually Z rather than Э (pronounced 'eh,' as opposed to the Russian E which is 'yeh'), and the B is just the soft sign rather than Б.

So, if including the G and O then GROGSKU IS MU HOMZOU.
 
I have for some time described myself as a libertarian - though I'm somewhat restrained in my own life and I don't recognise myself in the stereotypes above.
Is this another word that now can't be used - especially cross-Atlantic - like "liberal" ?
 
I have for some time described myself as a libertarian - though I'm somewhat restrained in my own life and I don't recognise myself in the stereotypes above.
Is this another word that now can't be used - especially cross-Atlantic - like "liberal" ?
No, not at all, you are miles off. As the above posts should quite clearly indicate to you. Do you support/are a member of any of the extreme-right wing groups laughed at above?
 
I have for some time described myself as a libertarian - though I'm somewhat restrained in my own life and I don't recognise myself in the stereotypes above.
Is this another word that now can't be used - especially cross-Atlantic - like "liberal" ?

I was a libertarian before it was right-wing. :(
 
No, not at all, you are miles off. As the above posts should quite clearly indicate to you. Do you support/are a member of any of the extreme-right wing groups laughed at above?

No, that's right, I'm sure. But tbf the increasing, stateside, tendancy to associate the term exclusively with "anarcho-capitalism", minarchism and various tones of extreme, neo-liberal, laissez-faire loonery does mean that our, (European?), use of the synonym for anarchism requires the use of an adjective like 'left' or 'communist'. Shame, an all that, but for 'global' understanding I suppose we just have to accept that's the way the ideological language has developed.
 
Can you give this lot a kicking while you're at it? They look relatively harmless, but if you tangled with them I think the one furthest left would stab you while the one furthest right sat on you.

Surely they'd just 'Release the hounds!' to fend you off?
 
Thing is, there are really no left/anarchist groups here (or in the US) that either call themselves libertarian or use it in their self-description - the five man libertarian discussion group in the mid-80s was pretty much the last thing i can think of, and before that the Libertarian League in New York in the 60s. If we're not actively using it then this will happen...
 
Thing is, there are really no left/anarchist groups here (or in the US) that either call themselves libertarian or use it in their self-description - the five man libertarian discussion group in the mid-80s was pretty much the last thing i can think of, and before that the Libertarian League in New York in the 60s. If we're not actively using it then this will happen...

Yep, the term 'left-libertarian' has tended to be used by individuals rather than groups. I suppose, in some cases, the rationale was to distance themselves (and their work) from the perceived neagtive connotations of the 'A' word in order to attract a wider audience?
 
Back
Top Bottom