Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
sadly there was no chance of the pig transplanting it to its stomach.Yea like how the Prime Monster transplanted his penis into a dead pig's mouth
sadly there was no chance of the pig transplanting it to its stomach.Yea like how the Prime Monster transplanted his penis into a dead pig's mouth
mandleson basically giving it 'keep your powder dry and give him enough rope'. Interesting timing with that red shift paper thats come outSlackers; it's nearly 2 weeks, after all.
John McDonnell, the new shadow chancellor, will tell the Labour conference that Britain must always live within its means as he announces that the party will vote in favour of a new fiscal charter proposed by George Osborne.
In a sign of the new Labour leadership’s determination to restore the party’s credibility on the economy, McDonnell has told the Guardian that the party will manage the economy carefully.
“We accept we are going to have to live within our means and we always will do – full stop,” the shadow chancellor said ahead of the Labour conference, which opens in Brighton on Sunday. He added: “We are not deficit deniers.”
To the possible surprise of some on the left, McDonnell will announce that Labour MPs will be expected later this autumn to vote for the chancellor’s fiscal charter unveiled in the budget in July.
Technically he could. He won't though will he? This isn't a cunning trick.Emphatically the right thing to do - he can now go on and ask why Osborne thinks its fiscally responsible to borrow at a much higher rate of interest via PFI (as opposed to normal borrowing), or why they are signing up to pay at least twice the going rate for electricity in the Hinckley C deal, or why they are paying far more in rents to private landlords to house people than it would cost to build council homes, or any one of a load of other things.
Technically he could. He won't though will he? This isn't a cunning trick.
Unless I'm missing something pretty fundamental...they're signing up to something that is utterly meaningless, yeah?
Grotesque. Creating a scaffold for your execution if/when you are in government post-2020 and you have to break the rules.
No there isn't and Osborne is happy to run one. Unfortunately he's better at convincing a public that thinks running a deficit is economic nonsense that he is Mr balance-the-books. All McDonnell is doing is playing the game and redefining spending as capital investment. The small group of voters who decide elections don't know shit about economics, its all a question of whose gib they most like the cut of.For goodness' sake! THERE IS NOTHING INHERENTLY WRONG WITH RUNNING A DEFICIT!
Yes, no one would be able or want to actually implement the 'If I go out in Leeds with a tenner and have four pints I can't have a fifth' economics once in power. I think that they have just decided that this idea of economics has become so commonsensical it is impossible to get power without appropriating the rhetoric surrounding it, whether this will be enough to get them into power or give them a chance of getting into power is another question as is whether it is ethical.
I think that they are trying to emulate how Syriza appropriated the language of austerity
I don't get ethics or rhetoric, to me, Labour's about persuading some sectors of the business class to back you (instead of the Tories) and some C2 voters who normally swing elections in this country, it's about signalling that you're going to defend those interests.
By 'appropriate' do you mean 'use'?
Syriza, die Linke, the old PCI, the new Rifundazione, the Mongolian People's Party, the CPI - leftism delivering neoliberalism in coalition with others.
I don't know enough about the Mongolian People's Party to comment.
Just what the fuck are you even doing in P&P without such knowledge?
I don't know enough about Die Linke or the Mongolian People's Party to comment on those cases but no argument on the others.
And McDonnell and Livingstone have been appropriating this kind of language successfully since the GLC days. If McDonnell can convince posters on Urban that he is some kind of austere closet monetarist than he's got a good chance of getting the attention of swing voters who think deficit spending is a load of mumbo-jumbo.I think that they have just decided that this idea of economics has become so commonsensical it is impossible to get power without appropriating the rhetoric surrounding it
Honestly after doing a bit of googling it seems like an intriguing case, I didn't really know that the really existing socialism > 'social democracy' pathway was a thing anywhere in Asia.
Rogernomics:I read an article the other day that discussed how the (supposedly left/labour) NZ govt of the late 70s pushed through neoliberal reforms at a rate Thatcher would blush at, just a sec...
Yes, no one would be able or want to actually implement the 'If I go out in Leeds with a tenner and have four pints I can't have a fifth' economics once in power. I think that they have just decided that this idea of economics has become so commonsensical it is impossible to get power without appropriating the rhetoric surrounding it, whether this will be enough to get them into power or give them a chance of getting into power is another question as is whether it is ethical.