TheHoodedClaw
acknowledging ur soup leg
He's only 66 ffs
QFT, he's a year younger than Hilary Clinton, and running for/being President is a hell of a lot more physically demanding than being Leader of the Opposition.
He's only 66 ffs
Lack of ambition? He's chair of the STWC - their aims being to stop the mightiest war machine the world has ever seen. And he's pro-nuclear disarmament - another huge aim.
Is someone who gets their modest aims implemented more or less ambitious than someone who aims high and has not yet achieved?
The Wehrmacht would have no chance against the combined UK/US 21st century military, even discounting the nukes.Wasn't the "mightiest war machine the world has ever seen" the Wehrmacht ?
It's an interesting point about ambitions and achievement, and the answer is not obvious. But on balance, surely it's more effective to achieve something, anything, early in the game. Then you build credibility, people take you more seriously, and incrementally you achieve more and more.
Demanding unicorns-for-everybody for your whole adult life, and then inevitably coming up empty is arguably a less effective tactic, although it does facilitate flamboyant virtue signalling.
Wasn't the "mightiest war machine the world has ever seen" the Wehrmacht ?
Blairism is buried beneath the rubble and a different structural and cultural divide has been revealed.
The Tories, this minister said, had to move fast to destroy Corbyn and to colonise the vast centre ground that he would surely vacate. My instinct was that of the Zen master. We’ll see.
Yet Corbyn seemed determined to hurl himself into precisely the bear-trap dug by his enemies.
For experienced old hands, however, uniting behind Corbyn will take the willing suspension of disbelief that he can defy the normal laws of political gravity. The iron fist of our wicked electoral system means he must sway some who voted Tory in the 100 seats he must win.
Of course they won't consider it. They're attempting to practice realpolitik in the world as-it-is (as they see it), not in the world as-they-want-it-to-be.
That requires that they operate on the principle of accommodating capitalism and (as with original post-war social-democratic politics) ameliorating the effects through policy. it doesn't require that they seek and maintain a state of ideological and revolutionary purity.
The above statement depends entirely on how you define "radical". We aren't all keyed into theoretical insight to the degree that you are, so for some mere resistance of any form is indeed "radical".
That's the sort of logic that resulted in the other 3 candidates failing to vote against the welfare bill.Surely that's something of a negative achievement, as it means that Corbyn has been unable to influence Labour policy in any way at all for the past 32 years.
Surely "selling out" is the more the sort of thing you worry about if you're in a rock band, rather than if you're an elected representative of a major political party that wants to improve the direction and happiness of a country of 65 million people.
My new least favourite buzz phrase.'virtue signalling'
My new least favourite buzz phrase.
Or "dont say anything about anything important, its not your place"It just seems to mean 'when people who aren't me say that they like stuff that's different to the stuff I like'
Crude identity politics and generalised assumptions.
Not what I expect from you.
BBC news article on the website giving a bio has plagiarised bits from wiki. Whoever did it left references in.
Check out Tristy's gob.
Separated at birth?
Supposedly Prince Harry has withdrawn his support from the Labour party tooSeparated at birth?
Depends if he looks like winning the General Election.How old is he? He could easily be dead before 2020. Not even joking. (Well, maybe a little.)
Next time they vote en masse for "Tory" policiesI've just joined the Labour Party, they're sending me a membership pack in 7-10 days. When can I expect my customary Urban 75 kicking?
He was my local MP for a few years. I used to see him at Tufnell Park tube station almost every morning. I'd always gave him a nod and a smile.I'm not optimistic but I will say this JC is a v v good local MP
Next time they vote en masse for "Tory" policies
A nasty horrible cunt of my acquaintance who has little good to say about anyone and certainly doesn't vote labour is a constituent of his and couldn't find a bad word to say about him (this was last year, I'm sure he's got a whole routine about how he's an evil nutter by now).I'm not optimistic but I will say this JC is a v v good local MP