Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

Almost certainly relayed to the bbc by one of the other candidates vassal's. 'Sources close to' - that combination of shithousery and corruption in the world of political journalism.
this has gone far enough, time to stop

which deputy head type figure could possibly combine such patronising with a sense of incipient panic? Yvette.
 
Will it be like the Oscars or something - Jim Carey hosting and Beyonce coming on to announce the winner?

(seriously - what time on saturday and is there live coverage? I want to see reactions)

mandelson2_3298704b.jpg
 
which deputy head type figure could possibly combine such patronising with a sense of incipient panic? Yvette.

Labour leadership candidate Jeremy Corbyn was urged by one of his most senior supporters to withdraw from the contest - but the message was rebuffed, the BBC understands.

BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg said the supporter told the left wing MP "a few weeks ago" he had not entered with the intention of winning.

Cooper, not a backer, Diane?

certainly not John McDonnell or Katie Clark
 
Cruddas gave a rare interview on R4 this morning. He was one that encouraged JC to stand and says he has still not made up his mind who to vote for :confused:
 
Labour leadership candidate Jeremy Corbyn was urged by one of his most senior supporters to withdraw from the contest - but the message was rebuffed, the BBC understands.
BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg said the supporter told the left wing MP "a few weeks ago" he had not entered with the intention of winning.
Well some people have greatness thrust upon them. Not like a BBC political correspondent to miss a well worn cliche like that.
 
Has anyone seen this despicable load of tosh from The New Statesman?
Ascent of the Submarine: George Osborne talks to Jason Cowley

I put this on the other thread

The union-busting rag has it right front and centre on its website too. The Fabians were not my cup of tea at all but this shames even their not so impressive legacy.

No doubt any complaints about a supposedly left-wing publication giving such a red baiting rant by the chancellor of the fucking Tory government will be met with accusations of 'virtue-signalling' by the likes of Helen Lewis but even from a business point of view it makes no sense. Why now would even the wooliest of Labour 'left' people buy their very expensive magazine? Why not just cut out the middle man and buy the Spectator or the frankly much better Economist? At least when buying The Economist you know that you are supporting unionised workers since it recognises the NUJ, unlike the New $tatesman
 
Osborne is obviously trying to win over those who want to win over anyway with vague ideological commitments that will be quickly discarded in an attempt to detoxify the corporate brand. Just like before the 2010 election, and the New $tatesman is giving him a vehicle to do it. Shameful.
 
yeah, the only good bit is osborne putting the boot on on the lib dems, I lolled. The rest is your standard alarmist garbage, talking up smith kinnock and blair as great party reformers in touch with 'what the public want from a labour party'.
The "good work will be undone" message is mischief-making but it also reveals the Tory desire to have a passive opposition. They hate the idea that someone will actually oppose them from the other side of the dispatch box.
 
I put this on the other thread

The union-busting rag has it right front and centre on its website too. The Fabians were not my cup of tea at all but this shames even their not so impressive legacy.

No doubt any complaints about a supposedly left-wing publication giving such a red baiting rant by the chancellor of the fucking Tory government will be met with accusations of 'virtue-signalling' by the likes of Helen Lewis but even from a business point of view it makes no sense. Why now would even the wooliest of Labour 'left' people buy their very expensive magazine? Why not just cut out the middle man and buy the Spectator or the frankly much better Economist? At least when buying The Economist you know that you are supporting unionised workers since it recognises the NUJ, unlike the New $tatesman
The NS's claim to be a 'left-wing' journal has been ringing hollow for a number of years but today, it has truly surpassed itself.
 
Osborne is obviously trying to win over those who want to win over anyway with vague ideological commitments that will be quickly discarded in an attempt to detoxify the corporate brand. Just like before the 2010 election, and the New $tatesman is giving him a vehicle to do it. Shameful.
Indeed, although the claim that the Tories occupy "the centre ground" is patently untrue given their incessant attacks on the vulnerable, benefit claimants and young people. Osborne's appropriation of the "progressive" label, along with his claim that the Tories are the "workers' party" would have even Baudrillard spitting in disgust.
 
My point is that the "workers' party" label is just an empty sign. The claim to be "progressive" is another.
I never know what politicians mean when they say "progressive politics", it is the sort of think the David Millibands of this world spout, I suspect it is just a bullshit phrase that means nothing and it always rankles when I hear it uttered.
 
Is Kendell suggesting that labour will split if Corbyn wins? Her speech this morning seems to suggest so.

The labour conservative wing would be dead in the water within months.

Jack Blanchard‏@Jack_Blanchard_ 10 mins10 minutes ago

Liz Kendall: After 2010 Ed Miliband "papered over the cracks" of a split in Labour that had been growing since 1997

Jack Blanchard‏@Jack_Blanchard_ 2 mins2 minutes ago

Kendall: Blairite/Brownite splits in must be "buried once and for all"
 
Back
Top Bottom