brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
As I said, it would have been more impressive.That just doesn't sound like Corbyn. He may have his faults, but sounding like a member of Class War Encore is not one of them.
As I said, it would have been more impressive.That just doesn't sound like Corbyn. He may have his faults, but sounding like a member of Class War Encore is not one of them.
Corbyn's said 'f*** the rich' at 1997 Hyde Park student rally with outbursts like that, there's no way he can possibly win now.
(I think they've run out of barrel)
I mean he doesn't say fuck this, fuck that, fuck the rich. It's not his style and I'm sure he wouldn't want to offend his many (mainly working class) constituents who strongly dislike that way of speaking.As I said, it would have been more impressive.
I didn't suggest he did (or does). What are you on about?I mean he doesn't say fuck this, fuck that, fuck the rich. It's not his style and I'm sure he wouldn't want to offend his many (mainly working class) constituents who strongly dislike that way of speaking.
Strange.My comment on Corbyn was not a response to your post suggesting an even sillier but different CWE slogan.
Reckon they'd have got more milage if they'd had found a :respect the rich quote. Can't believe they've thrown everything at this election but looks like they haveYou mean to scrape? It is amazing that the right wing newspapers have to keep looking for things to condemn in Corbyn, this time as far back as 1997. The closer it gets to his election the harder they try. Why are they so scared of him? They must think that his policies will appeal to enough people to endanger the Tory control of parliament.
I suppose it because it still the "silly season" until Parliament re-convenes . They have nothing to talk about.Reckon they'd have got more milage if they'd had found a :respect the rich quote. Can't believe they've thrown everything at this election but looks like they have
It's a failure of deferred gratification for the right wing press. They desperately want him elected in one sense so they can run loony left stories for the next 5 years and they genuinely think he can't win the next general election. But they can't stop themselves doing everything they can to damage his campaign (as they would see it - I doubt it actually does anything to damage him).Ramping up the hysteria. Morton Morland's cartoon in the Times:
I'd have thought it more likely that they were (still) dancing to the tune of the government, who have zigzagged from being derisive about JC, to bigging him up almost for a laugh, to a slightly uncomfortable realisation that a) he might actually end up leading the Opposition, and b) an awful lot of people seem to like what he has to say.It's a failure of deferred gratification for the right wing press. They desperately want him elected in one sense so they can run loony left stories for the next 5 years and they genuinely think he can't win the next general election. But they can't stop themselves doing everything they can to damage his campaign (as they would see it - I doubt it actually does anything to damage him).
Wrong threadbut can you trust cu?
Wrong thread
It doesn't seem to be.I had no idea that paying the political levy was a requirement to vote
Apparently 50% of members/supporters not voted yet:
Labour leadership campaign enters final stage with half of members yet to vote
That's very high, even with all the shenanigans, ballots not being sent out etc. Hard to tell what these figures represent though and it's got to the point where I can't see how the party could make any reliable statistical claims. At some point last week the party was claiming up to 60,000 could be stopped from voting (subs not up to date, multiple registrations etc.).
May well be the case. Impossible to even guestimate in this chaotic election, but you'd imagine corbynistas voted early, on the back of his early rallies and publicity. People voting over the last few days and into this week could well be voting for the others. On the other hand, late voters could be people who took a while to get approved/registered, corbyn voters. Anyway, it will be interesting to see some analysis on the figures, in terms of who voted, 2nd preferences etc - and also to see the full story in terms of the rejections.Doesn't that usually help the more 'conservative' candidates, silent majority, etc?
wish I had took up my Unite Community vote now.
Apparently 50% of members/supporters not voted yet:
Labour leadership campaign enters final stage with half of members yet to vote
That's very high, even with all the shenanigans, ballots not being sent out etc. Hard to tell what these figures represent though and it's got to the point where I can't see how the party could make any reliable statistical claims. At some point last week the party was claiming up to 60,000 could be stopped from voting (subs not up to date, multiple registrations etc.).