Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

Their revelation is that voters choose by emotion and attitude rather than logic and policy? That's no revelation, that news is as old as the hills. People base their voting practice on what their perception of "people like them" vote for. This study is no different.

No, dammit. It reveals they are robots. Actual robots!

robot_1296607c.jpg
 
He hasn't. Did you read it?

Well, he sort of has. Although he distances himself from Corbyn, he opposes British foreign policy and says he agrees with Corbyn's attempts to correct it--and most important, he wants Corbyn to win.

"Nevertheless Corbyn is our only current hope of any serious challenge to a failed orthodoxy. Blair and Cameron have both adopted a foreign policy based on subservience rather than partnership with the United States, which has done grave damage to British interests."

http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/corbyn-troublemaker-1532484034#.dpuf
 
Well, he sort of has. Although he distances himself from Corbyn, he opposes British foreign policy and says he agrees with Corbyn's attempts to correct it--and most important, he wants Corbyn to win.

Yes, there is nothing necessarily left-wing about his perspective on foreign policy. You can come from a totally different political philosophy and have views on foreign policy, or aspects of it, not dissimilar from Pilger or Chomsky. Farage's position on Ukraine and Greece has been pretty much in tandem with the consensus here, for example. It's just the product of a basic knowledge of history which is not informed by the establishment 'common sense' which necessitates an ignorance of that basic knowledge. You can see the same with others that most of us here find objectionable like Le Pen who recently claimed to support Podemos and Syriza over their far-right equivalents in Spain and Greece.
 
Well, he sort of has. Although he distances himself from Corbyn, he opposes British foreign policy and says he agrees with Corbyn's attempts to correct it--and most important, he wants Corbyn to win.

"Nevertheless Corbyn is our only current hope of any serious challenge to a failed orthodoxy. Blair and Cameron have both adopted a foreign policy based on subservience rather than partnership with the United States, which has done grave damage to British interests."

http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/corbyn-troublemaker-1532484034#.dpuf
Quite a convenient position, given his employ.
 
All I can find is this http://www.thenational.ae/uae/al-jazeera-executive-helped-to-launch-controversial-uk-website

A senior executive with Qatar’s TV network Al Jazeera was closely involved with setting up the London news website Middle East Eye, some of whose staff have links to organisations sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Jonathan Powell, an Al Jazeera employee since 2009, spent several months in the UK working on Middle East Eye, which promised “independently produced news, analysis and opinion” at its launch in April. MEE claims to have “no political master, movement or country”.
 
I have never heard of MiddleEastEye before, is the funding coming from somewhere in particular? Their wiki isn't very helpful
Me neither, and apart from the AJ link alluded to, I've no idea. It just struck me that an anti-US position might well play well to his new readership/employer.
 
Well yes, but it isn't as if he has modified his opinions because of who he works for.
If so, that also gives the lie to the notion that Oborne's support of Corbyn's "anti-imperialist' outlook constitutes a 'move to the left' on his part.
 
only TL has suggested a move to the left tbf, which just shows they don't pay attention. This is entirely consistent with Oborne's politics.
 
Back
Top Bottom