Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

Jeremy Corbyn: Labour membership will determine policy, not me

Policy will be made by Labour members and not the leader, shadow cabinet, or parliamentary party, Jeremy Corbyn has said in a debate with his three leadership rivals organised by the Guardian. The frontrunner has previously made clear that his policy proposals are only suggestions that would have to be agreed by colleagues, but this is his clearest indication yet that the role of MPs and the shadow cabinet would be diminished.

“I don’t think we can go on having policy made by the leader, shadow cabinet, or parliamentary Labour party. It’s got to go much wider. Party members need to be more enfranchised. Whoever is elected will have a mandate from a large membership.”

Getting the Labour party members to agree policy is one way in which Corbyn could get around the difficult problem of his lack of support in the parliamentary party, in which he has the support of just 20 MPs....
 
Getting the Labour party members to agree policy is one way in which Corbyn could get around the difficult problem of his lack of support in the parliamentary party, in which he has the support of just 20 MPs....
this isn't true. I wonder why the guardian would want to spread such disinformation? :hmm:
 
Is it fewer than that?

I think I've seen that number bandied around before, but not sure how it's been arrived at (maybe the number who nominated him, minus the number who subsequently said they wished they hadn't?)

Anyway, the number of MPs who support him ATM is not especially important, since they don't get any more of a vote than the rest of the electorate. What will matter more is the number who would be prepared to work with him as leader of the party should he be elected, and I suspect that's rather more than 20.

Guardian shit stirring, for a change.
 
I think I've seen that number bandied around before, but not sure how it's been arrived at (maybe the number who nominated him, minus the number who subsequently said they wished they hadn't?)

Anyway, the number of MPs who support him ATM is not especially important, since they don't get any more of a vote than the rest of the electorate. What will matter more is the number who would be prepared to work with him as leader of the party should he be elected, and I suspect that's rather more than 20.

Guardian shit stirring, for a change.
Gonna be such fun watching the careerist, neo-lab fuckers squirming with rictus grin to persuade us that they agree with Jeremy.
 
Gonna be such fun watching the careerist, neo-lab fuckers squirming with rictus grin to persuade us that they agree with Jeremy.

To some extent, we may see the careerists disentangling themselves from the out-and-out neo-Lab fuckers as they see which way the wind is blowing. Interesting to see how it all unfolds, certainly :thumbs:
 
Hilary Benn is awful. Through and through Blairite, he came to speak to a Labour Students meeting I went to at university and his eyes positively lit up when talking about shrinking the state and how in his constituency libraries were being privatised and run by volunteers.
 
OK Hilary is out then. Jez will have to place an advert in the Private Eye:

'Wanted Chancellor of the Exchequer (shadow), salary negotiable, prospects medium to good, benefits include tied cottage in smart residential area and new red box'..
 
I thought Natalie made a good fist of her leadership job during the gen election. Fuck the media characterization of her being useless, she wasn't.
 
Back
Top Bottom