Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keystone XL flowing ahead

Perhaps, but if so they are living in a dreamworld imo. Space technology is proceeding at a pretty brisk pace but I still think it'll be quite some time before people can migrate off the planet in any meaningful sense. Unless there's some kind of major braekthrough of course.

I didn't actually mean space travel, but I'm sure some of them do think that. I was suggesting that most of them are old and don't expect to live long enough to see the real effects of what they've done. They might, very well, be wrong on that count too, if some of the numbers on climate change I'm seeing are correct. I've noticed that some of them have a backup plan to move into survival shelters. There's big ones in Kansas and South Dakota being built. Some with luxury apartments of 10,000 sq feet with lap pools, saunas, movie theatres, etc.
 
Last edited:
:(

Keystone pipeline leak in South Dakota about double previous estimate: paper

The Keystone crude oil pipeline leak in November in rural South Dakota was nearly double the original estimate, making it one of the largest U.S. inland spills since 2010, a newspaper report on Saturday said.

Robynn Tysver, a spokeswoman for Calgary-based TransCanada Corp, which owns the pipeline, told the Aberdeen American News some 9,700 barrels of oil leaked in the Nov. 16 spill, the South Dakota paper reported. The original estimate was 5,000 barrels.
 
If you can't get what you want any other way, buy a few politicians:

The developer of the Keystone XL pipeline is showering Nebraska's public officials with campaign cash as it fights for regulatory approval in a state that is one of the last lines of resistance for the $8 billion project.

A political action committee for TransCanada Inc. has donated more than $65,000 to campaigns within the last year, mostly to Republican state lawmakers, the Nebraska GOP and Gov. Pete Ricketts, according to a review of campaign disclosure records.

Pipeline opponents say the company's contributions show it's trying to exert influence over the state's top elected officials at the expense of landowners who don't want the pipeline running through their property.

"There is no question big political donations have bought some politicians," said Jane Kleeb, president of the Bold Alliance.


http://journalstar.com/news/state-a...cle_f59513de-ff99-579e-973e-9a50971f1f13.html
 
how many people went to protest!
The XL Pipeline has spawned some odd pairings of conservatives and liberals, cowboys and Indians. Here's some pictures from the ongoing protests against the pipeline (odd that you hear nothing of it in the news). This is a group called The Cowboy and Indian Alliance:

RP_Saturday_crowd_shot.jpg



horse_riders_500.jpg


President Obama further postponed making a decision on the pipeline last week. He said he can't make a decision until a route is finalized through Nebraska.
 
Agree with you.
This is an update concerning the Canadian pipelines.

Today, the Energy East pipeline, running from the western oil fields to New Bruswick, was officially canceled.

Although many are disappointed about the decision and are currently ranting and raving, I consider this a victory.

Municipalities along the route got together and submitted their minimum requirements for a pipeline to pass though their land. I'm guessing that the minimum requirements were too much, so TransCanada pulled their plans.

Here is hoping that Nebraska has similar success.
 
You are,unfortunately, probably right, the move from high cost oil fields, the disinvestment programme, the looming demise of coal, they are all about the 'market' looking at the future and not seeing much of one for traditional Fossil fuels.
It's a shame that the accelerating move from carbon to renewables is being driven by the thirst for corporate profits rather than a genuine desire to avert AGW, but if it gets the boat moving in the right direction, so be it.

Yes, it will be useful!
 
Except the political and economic issues there's much concern about the climate changes. The seismic activity is increasing all over the world! Everyone interested to find out about it can check this infromation right here Live Earthquake Map And Seismic Activity. And even just looking out of the window, we can clearly see that the weather is raging. Here's a flood in the rainless region, there are abnormal low or high temperatures!
 
Additional environmental assessment ordered for Keystone XL pipeline

A federal judge in Montana has ordered an environmental assessment for the altered route of TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline.

The ruling comes as the latest potential setback for a pipeline that the Calgary-based company has been trying to build for a decade.

Plaintiffs including the Indigenous Environmental Network and Northern Plains Resource Council had brought the lawsuit after Nebraska approved an alternative route to the one TransCanada had proposed through the state.

They argued that the U.S. State Department violated several acts in issuing a presidential permit for the pipeline without a proper environmental assessment of the changed route

quick clip from the ruling - past on July 31 - Keystone XL pipeline would have no major impact on Nebraska: report

A new planned route for the Keystone XL pipeline through Nebraska would not have a major impact on the state’s water, land or wildlife, according to an updated environmental study produced by U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration.

The U.S. State Department released a draft study Monday of the pipeline’s potential environmental impact in Nebraska, where opponents have repeatedly thwarted the project. The study is now subject to public input through Aug. 29 before it’s finalized.
 
“The anti-fossil fuel movement is the No. 1 challenge threatening our industry, especially when they have sympathizers in the White House, Ottawa, and elsewhere in public office,” wrote the editor of the Pipeline and Gas Journal, an industry trade publication, shortly before the 2016 election.

Welund specializes in profiling these activist threats and maintains a “live archive” of original content that, it says, is used by dozens of international corporations, law enforcement agencies, and government bodies. Its subscriber-only intelligence platform appears to be largely composed of open source data—that is, news reports, online information, and strategic analysis—according to the firm’s contracts with the Canadian government. At industry gatherings, the company has emphasized the importance of continuously following social media to develop effective counter campaigns. The firm promises to closely monitor activists, and one of its Canadian contracts referred to the use of open and “other sources.” Canadian officials declined to say what those “other sources” included.

At the Houston conference, Moran described activists as traveling “professionals” who have more experience than the companies they are protesting. “We keep track of them,” Moran said. “You’ll see them at the Marcellus. You’ll see them at Bayou Bridge. That’s what they do.” The Bayou Bridge Pipeline is a controversial project in Texas and Louisiana; the Marcellus shale formation is the epicenter of fracking in the eastern United States.

The private intelligence firm keeping tabs on environmentalists

If you read the entire article, Canada doesn't come out all the well.
 
Lost this round. On to the next round:

The vote will allow the pipeline to go through Nebraska, but not on the path favored by TransCanada, the developer of the project. The approved path is further east than originally planned.

The decision is likely to be immediately challenged by Native American and environmental groups that claim the pipeline endangers water supplies and will worsen climate change. Last week, an existing Keystone pipeline spilled 210,000 gallons of oil in South Dakota, although the Nebraska panel did not take this into consideration in its decision.

While the pipeline has been ostensibly approved, it faces a thicket of legal challenges that may delay or even halt the project. Bill McKibben, the co-founder of climate group 350.org and a leading opponent of the pipeline, said lawyers he’d spoken to are “cheerful and that there is “lots of room to fight.”

Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, said the group is already assessing its legal options. “Our movement defeated this pipeline once, and we will do it again,” he said.

Nebraska regulators approve Keystone XL pipeline route

The next step is continuing in the courts and continuing the protest. I'm thinking its going to get as ugly as other anti-pipeline protests have been. Was hoping to avoid that, but there it is. You can't literally bulldoze over people and expect them to lay down for it. We knew this was where it was headed when Trump was elected.
 
Last edited:
Well that was unexpected:

A federal judge temporarily blocked construction of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, ruling late Thursday that the Trump administration had failed to justify its decision granting a permit for the 1,200-mile long project designed to connect Canada’s oil sands fields with Texas' Gulf Coast refineries.

The judge, Brian Morris of the U.S. District Court in Montana, said theState Department ignored crucial issues of climate change in order to further the president’s goal of letting the pipeline be built. In doing so, the administration ran afoul of the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires “reasoned” explanations for government decisions, particularly when they represent reversals of well-studied actions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...ium=post&utm_source=fb&utm_term=.c4c0df4e650a

The judge is right, of course. It's still unexpected.
 
Well that was unexpected:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...ium=post&utm_source=fb&utm_term=.c4c0df4e650a

The judge is right, of course. It's still unexpected.
Investment analysts view it as a temporary setback.
While the court's decision is "definitely a major setback in terms of timing, this is unlikely to be the nail in the coffin for Keystone XL."

That's because the ruling is "largely symbolic" and requires only that the State Department "spill a little more ink," according to Katie Bays, an analyst at Height Securities LLC. "We do not view this ruling as a major risk for the pipeline and expect the State Department can resolve all the deficiencies identified by the court," she said.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Brandon Barnes characterized the ruling as "not that big of a deal" and said the issue may be cleared up even before a pending Nebraska Supreme Court decision is resolved.
Keystone XL Ruling Could Just Be Symbolic
 
Rapid City, S.D. • Some South Dakota landowners are outraged over liens hitting their property related to the Keystone XL crude-oil pipeline.

Iowa-based Brandenburg Drainage filed 23 liens totaling more than $1 million against Meade County landowners last month, the Rapid City Journal reported. The lien amounts ranged from about $3,600 to nearly $244,000.

Brandenburg Drainage is a subcontractor of a company that developer TransCanada hired to improve county roads during the construction phase of the Keystone XL pipeline project.

Brandenburg Drainage completed some road improvement work last fall before a dispute arose with contractor Diamond Willow Energy. Brandenburg Drainage filed mechanic's liens against the landowners to recover money the company claims they're owed by Diamond Willow.

Mechanic's liens are a product of state laws that date back to the 1870s and are usually placed on property owned by the person who ordered the work. The liens are unusual because the affected landowners aren't involved in the projects.

Landowners face $1M in liens over Keystone XL road dispute

Even if you're in favor of the pipeline, you have to be against some of these laws that allow corporations to take property or file liens again people with barely a hearing, especially in an instance like this.
 
Keystone XL pipeline opponents ask judge to strike down Trump's permit

Opponents of the long-stalled Keystone XL oil pipeline asked a federal court Friday in a lawsuit to declare President Donald Trump acted illegally when he issued a new permit for the project in a bid to get around an earlier court ruling.

In November, U.S. District Judge Brian Morris ruled that the Trump administration did not fully consider potential oil spills and other impacts when it approved the pipeline in 2017.

Trump's new permit, issued last week, is intended to circumvent that ruling and kick-start the proposal to ship crude oil from the tar sands of western Canada to U.S. refineries.

White House officials have said the presidential permit is immune from court review. But legal experts say that's an open question, and that the case could further test the limits of Trump's use of presidential power to get his way.
 
Trump executive order will aim to prevent states from blocking pipelines, energy infrastructure

President Donald Trump will issue an executive order that aims to prevent states from blocking pipelines and other energy infrastructure by using authority granted to them under the Clean Water Act.

Senior administration officials on Tuesday previewed the action and several others, which are contained in two executive orders that Trump will sign during a trip to Texas on Wednesday. They are the latest in a series of executive orders by Trump meant to roll back energy regulations and promote fossil fuel development.

The new executive order represents a shot from the White House in the ongoing battle between beltway Republicans and Democratic governors opposed to fossil fuel developments in their states. It has been anticipated for nearly three months and is expected to be challenged in court.

Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, companies must obtain certifications from the state before they can build federally-approved infrastructure, like pipelines, within that state’s borders.

States can refuse to issue the certifications if they determine the project will have a negative impact on water quality within their jurisdiction, even if the project has gotten the green light from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the independent panel that regulates interstate pipelines and transmission lines.
 
And the fight goes on:

The Rosebud Sioux and Fort Belknap tribes filed suit in September, claiming there had been no analysis detailing how the project would affect their water systems and treaty rights, and asking the court to set aside the State Department's 2017 permit and to block any further construction or use of the pipeline.

In their complaint, the tribes said the pipeline permit was issued in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act and National Historic Preservation Act because the State Department neglected to complete the required analyses of the trust obligation the federal government owes to them.

In November, U.S. District Judge Brian Morris — the same judge as in the current suit — vacated the 2017 permit, saying the administration's decision didn't pass legal muster on several counts, led by an insufficiently explained reversal of the Obama-era conclusions about the climate-related impacts of the project.

In March, Trump issued a new cross-border permit in an apparent effort to circumvent that ruling.

That strategy bore fruit last month, when the Ninth Circuit tossed a consolidated case brought by environmental groups and tribes looking to block construction of the pipeline, finding the action was rendered moot by Trump's issuance of the new permit.

On June 27, the administration said in its motion to dismiss the Rosebud Sioux and Fort Belknap tribes' suit that their claims over the 2017 permit were similarly moot, and that their claims over the 2019 permit failed for lack of standing because they "allege no injuries arising from the border crossing itself, which is the only thing that the permit authorized."

In their response Friday, the tribes said that the 2019 permit did authorize the entire pipeline and not just a short section at the border, and that Trump intruded on Congress' power when he issued the permit.

While the tribes acknowledged their claims regarding the 2017 permit are now moot, they argued they still have standing under their treaties "because the pipeline would cross their lands (surface and mineral estates), their sacred sites and ceremonial grounds, and would threaten their only water supply."

Trump "injured the tribes by effectively abrogating the treaties and approving the pipeline through their lands" and "issued the 2019 permit without seeking Rosebud's consent to cross Rosebud's lands as required by the treaties," according to the filing.

Tribes Say Trump Violated Treaties By OKing Keystone XL - Law360

If this can be pushed past the 2020 election, perhaps a different President will drop it.
 
Last edited:
Trump administration wants tribes’ Keystone XL pipeline lawsuit dismissed

Attorneys for the Trump administration want a U.S. judge to throw out a lawsuit from Native American tribes trying to block the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Alberta to Nebraska.

Tribes in Montana and South Dakota say U.S. President Donald Trump approved the pipeline without considering potential damage to cultural sites from spills and construction.

READ MORE: Nebraska court upholds state’s approval of Keystone XL Pipeline path

The administration counters that Trump’s approval applies only to a 1-mile (1.6-kilometre) section of pipeline along the U.S.-Canada border and not the rest of the line.

U.S. District Judge Brian Morris will preside over a Thursday hearing on the government’s attempt to dismiss the case.

The judge blocked the line in November, saying more environmental studies were needed. But Trump circumvented that ruling in March by issuing a new permit involving the $8 billion, 1,184-mile (1,900-kilometre) project.
 
Keystone pipeline leaks unknown amount of oil in North Dakota

" "We don't yet know the extent of the damage from this latest tar sands spill, but what we do know is that this is not the first time this pipeline has spilled toxic tar sands, and it won't be the last," associate director Catherine Collentine said in a statement. "We've always said it's not a question of whether a pipeline will spill, but when, and once again TC Energy has made our case for us." "
 
BILLINGS — Protesters briefly disrupted a public meeting on the Keystone XL pipeline in Billings Tuesday night, arguing the project is bad for Montana lands and the meeting format did not allow for open dialogue.

About an hour after the meeting started at the Billings Hotel and Convention Center, some demonstrators moved inside to argue with Montana county officials who support the project.

It started with one person who stood from the tables where people were quietly writing comments and speaking with officials. That person slightly raised their voice to share their opinion with those in the room, starting an argument.

“When in America was it okay for eminent domain to be used for private gain?" said Jane Kleeb, founder of the citizen group and project opponent BOLD Nebraska during the argument.

Video here:

Heated debate breaks out at Keystone pipeline meeting in Billings

I'm a little surprised the room was as empty as it was. All of the meetings I've been to have been packed to the walls.
 
Big Oil Fears Keystone XL Ruling Means End of Easy Pipeline Permits
desmogblog. May 3, 2020
On April 15, Judge Brian Morris nullified water-crossing permits in Montana that were granted for the Keystone XL, a major setback for the long-embattled tar sands oil pipeline. The ruling came just days after Keystone XL owner TC Energy, formerly known as TransCanada, obtained billions of dollars in subsidies from the Alberta government as global oil prices plummeted.

The oil and gas industry has taken notice. Seemingly just a ruling on Keystone XL — the subject of opposition by the climate movement for the past decade — the ruling could have far broader implications for the future of building water-crossing pipelines and utility lines.

In his decision, Judge Morris cited a potential violation of the Endangered Species Act when he ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to do a deeper analysis of potential impacts to protected species. Morris required the Corps to demonstrate whether or not it could construct the pipeline without harming endangered species, such as the Pallid Sturgeon or the American burying beetle. Instead, the Army Corps “failed to consider relevant expert analysis and failed to articulate a rational connection between the facts it found and the choice it made,” Morris ruled, when the Corps gave Keystone XL the initial green light.
 
Keystone blocked again, this time by the Supreme Court:

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to let construction start on TC Energy Corp.’s Keystone XL oil-sands pipeline, rejecting a bid by President Trump’s administration to jump-start the long-delayed project.

The justices, without explanation or noted dissent, left in force part of a federal court order that blocks use of a key federal permit. Although the justices cleared the way for other oil-and-gas pipeline construction projects to use the permit, they refused to do so for Keystone XL.


By the time this gets unblocked, we will (hopefully) have a different administration in office.
 
And the Atlantic Coast pipeline is cancelled:

After protracted legal conflicts and a wave of delays, the two energy companies partnering on the project, Dominion Energy in Richmond, Virginia, and Duke Energy in Charlotte, North Carolina, announced they were abandoning the joint venture, a natural gas pipeline that was supposed to zigzag about 600 miles through West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina.

It was a surprising twist in a fight that had included intense community opposition, a concession from the two companies that they couldn't overcome the ballooning cost of the project — which had nearly doubled to $8 billion from its original estimate of about $4.5 billion — and uncertainty surrounding the pipeline's possible completion in early 2022, which would have been an almost three-and-a-half-year delay. The high-stakes plan was formally proposed in 2014, and was expected to benefit from the Trump administration's efforts to roll back federal oversight and speed up the building of major infrastructure projects.


Been a lousy day for energy companies, but at least they weren't bitten by dogs, sprayed with tear gas, or arrested on their own land.
 
I think we knew this, but its nice to see it in writing:

THE WEEKEND BEFORE Donald Trump was elected president in 2016, a secret private security initiative called “Operation Baratheon” was scheduled to begin. A PowerPoint presentation laid out the plan for Joel McCollough, a burly ex-Marine bearing a resemblance to “Game of Thrones” character King Robert Baratheon. He had been posing as an opponent of the Dakota Access pipeline at protests in Iowa but was now assigned to travel to North Dakota to collect intelligence on the growing anti-pipeline movement.

There, near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, thousands were camped out as part of the Indigenous-led resistance to the Dakota Access pipeline. Energy Transfer, the venture’s parent company, had plans to run the Dakota Access pipeline under the Missouri River. Calling themselves water protectors, the people in camp objected to the threat the pipeline would present to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s primary drinking water source.

The effort to stop the pipeline had quickly become one of the most important Indigenous uprisings of the past century in the U.S. And McCollough, working for the mercenary security firm TigerSwan, was a key player in Energy Transfer’s multistate effort to defeat the resistance, newly released documents reveal. TigerSwan took a militaristic approach: To McCollough and his colleagues, the anti-pipeline movement was akin to the insurgencies the veterans had confronted in Afghanistan and Iraq. In line with that view, they deployed the same kinds of subversive tactics used in theaters of war.

One of these tactics was the use of spies to infiltrate so-called insurgents. That was McCollough’s goal when, in November 2016, he drove to North Dakota with an unwitting pipeline opponent. A PowerPoint slide titled “Mission” described exactly what he would do once he arrived: “infiltrate one of the Standing Rock camps.” Another slide, titled “Situation,” listed his adversaries, under the heading of “Belligerents”: “Native American activists, anti-establishment radicals, independent press, protester intelligence cells, camp security.”

 
Back
Top Bottom