You said that already.'Unshakeable support' = grotesque partisan profiteering for the masters of war that poison the planet and stamp on it's weakest.
You said that already.
I'm just curious as to why you repeated it?
It was being discussed wasnt it? No need to quote yourself.Because it needs discussing in light of Starmer's clearly myopic and frankly destructive comments. Or not, others took issue.
Well here's a clincher: skwakwbox who I honestly don't usually look at but are going to be the impartial source on this
Johnson says Starmer ‘nothing to do’ with Savile decision – but is he right?
Starmer: no denial of involvement in Savile decision – nor naming anyone else who was – though FOI shows he was at least aware After pressure from his own MPs rallying to Keir Starmer&#…skwawkbox.org
Note this: Starmer didn't respond to Skwawkbox despite a deadline of 5pm that day.
I think we all know the reason for this
Yeah I am aware that it used to have a largely working class membership in the past, but I would still not count it as ever being pro-working class. I mean this is a party that once forced working class people into labour camps for starters, and sent troops against striking workers etc. But as you say - it's always been a capitalist party.
Oh good - some rare indication of what Starmer's Labour actually thinks about something. Just a shame it's such inept, futile bullshit.
Labour will look at ‘naming and shaming’ scheme for people convicted of buying drugs
Congratulations to drugs for winning the war on drugsOh good - some rare indication of what Starmer's Labour actually thinks about something. Just a shame it's such inept, futile bullshit.
Labour will look at ‘naming and shaming’ scheme for people convicted of buying drugs
Oh good - some rare indication of what Starmer's Labour actually thinks about something. Just a shame it's such inept, futile bullshit.
Labour will look at ‘naming and shaming’ scheme for people convicted of buying drugs