Nurse, he's out of bed again!I wish i ssais THQFST
Nurse, he's out of bed again!I wish i ssais THQFST
Jealous. I thought you had them points in the bag?Nurse, he's out of bed again!
Pre-September stories about corbyn membership now please
I've asked the MCC to declare Trescothick's runs null and void.Jealous. I thought you had them points in the bag?
TaMembership at 'August 2015'; 270k (direct link to PDF, may not work - www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn05125.pdf), around 325,000 at 13 Sept but with 15,000 signing up in the 'last 24 hours'. So maybe in the region of 300,000. It was around 190k for Miliband's period as leader (also in PDF).
Doesn't effect corbyn. His vote is still there. It's game over.
They'll come around I think.JC will have lost some support of that number.
This tickled me: "I think Angela Eagle should now go to Peter Mandelson at his Palace and tender her resignation immediately"
I shall be down there tmw. Wankers phrase...but anyone's game.I've asked the MCC to declare Trescothick's runs null and void.
I think Corbyn is more than capable of handling Watson.Telegraph is on this...
That's from a year ago and doesn't tell you anything about now, does it? It's also only about unwaged members.Labour Party elections and Unite Community members
Doesn't look like Unite Community members can vote unless they are already affiliated.
This is the last battleground. Losing this one was fatal. Maybe.If they're trying to put the original 3 quidders off shelling out another £25 (and fuck sake, the members will have paid out £24 over the last six months - and is that why they chose £25 - without the obvious tactic of dismissing the votes of anyone who can't fucking afford the new, made up supporters fee now ) and where there's been *some* talk of polls showing a number of his original membership voters being horrified by Corbyn splitting the party etc - although I'd imagine there'd be a swing back the other way, too? Errrm - question was - what was the actual % membership vote for him the first time around? And the supporters?
And are the union affiliated voters unaffected?
And the Guardian'sTelegraph is on this...
*shaking head smiley*In a crunch meeting at Labour’s Westminster headquarters that began at 2pm on Tuesday and continued into the evening, NEC members, including Corbyn himself, voted 18-14 in a secret ballot that he could bypass the rule that forces candidates to show they have the backing of 20% of the party’s MPs and MEPs.
First session is crucial...I shall be down there tmw. Wankers phrase...but anyone's game.
That's from a year ago and doesn't tell you anything about now, does it? It's also only about unwaged members.
I'd guess any legal challenge would be about the "interpretation of the rules", according the radio news the NEC had legal opinions that Corbyn would need 20% of the PLP to nominate him, Corbyn had legal opinions saying he didn't. So there is a disputeAnd who'd even bring it ? The NEC against themselves and their own decision ? A trade union ? Eagle ?
The decision doesn't exclude anyone from the race , doesn't impinge even remotely on anyone's right to run for leadership . Places no hurdles in front of anyone . Who's going to waste a fortune on what'll most likely be a failure ? And on something that could drag on and on and during all that time will still leave Corbyn as the incumbent . Can't see it myself.
Think a split could be much more likely .
Momentum have (apparently) already said as much...just 30 mins after saying that the decision of the NEC should be respected by all!I assume there'll be a legal challenge re: the changes to new members/voting