Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
'Aye well, when I were a lad, we had straight bananas'Shelled or unshelled peas?
- luxury!
'Aye well, when I were a lad, we had straight bananas'Shelled or unshelled peas?
From the IWCA:
“Coming out unequivocally against Brexit damages Labour less in purely electoral terms than coming out for it, as much of Labour’s working class base deserted the party long ago. The Oxford researchers Jon Mellon and Geoffrey Evans found in 2014 that ‘Labour’s move to the ‘liberal consensus’ on the EU and immigration left many of their core voters out in the cold a long time before UKIP were an effective political presence. These voters left Labour in 2001, 2005 and 2010.’ Labour accepting the liberal agenda on first Brexit, and then presumably everything else, only further exacerbates this process.
If one wants to give the Corbyn leadership some credit, one might say they at least have some vestigial awareness of the danger taking this path entails. When Transport Secretary Chris Grayling recently said that blocking Brexit would 'open the door to extremist populist political forces in this country of the kind we see in other countries in Europe’, Labour’s David Lammy accused him of ‘gutter politics’ and ‘appeasement’ while Nick Ryan of Hope Not Hate said the remark ‘simply plays into the hands of those extremists seeking to use Brexit as a platform to boost their profile.’
While Grayling’s timing may well have been cynically motivated, the observation is not wrong. What most of the political, economic and media elite have wanted since the Brexit vote is as close to neo-liberalism as usual as possible, with the minimum of disruption emanating from this democratic aberration. Should they succeed, any semi-competent populist right movement would be able to adopt a narrative of class and democratic betrayal, and position themselves as the alternative to the entire condescending liberal establishment. It’s a narrative that would have resonance for one simple reason: there would be a good deal of truth to it.
And where the BNP took over half a million votes at the 2010 general election, close to a million in the 2009 Euro election, and UKIP 3.8 million votes in 2015, this narrative would in the first instance have a pool of 17 million disproportionately working class Leave voters to pitch to. So while middle-class ultra-Remainers like to pitch the idea that Brexit = fascism, it is the contempt for democratic expression, and the longer-term fundamental retreat from class politics by the left, that creates the imminent risk. Furthermore, there is nothing the Labour party can do to address this: it is a task for the class itself and those who believe in it as the ultimate agent of change.
I'm not taking any bets in pounds: A 5-pound bag of potatoes, three onions, four leeks, a good-sized turnip and two carrots says we won't have a no-deal Brexit by the end of March.
What does this mean?
“As I set out in Liverpool, a public vote has to be an option for Labour. After all, deeply embedded in our values are internationalism, collaboration and cooperation with our European partners.”
And?
Starmer.Where is this from/who said it?
Last privately-educated Oxbridge white male in with a shot. What's not to like?I cannot understand why people keep suggesting Starmer is some sort of leadership candidate, he's a charisma vacuum with a silly voice.
From the IWCA:
“Coming out unequivocally against Brexit damages Labour less in purely electoral terms than coming out for it, as much of Labour’s working class base deserted the party long ago. The Oxford researchers Jon Mellon and Geoffrey Evans found in 2014 that ‘Labour’s move to the ‘liberal consensus’ on the EU and immigration left many of their core voters out in the cold a long time before UKIP were an effective political presence. These voters left Labour in 2001, 2005 and 2010.’ Labour accepting the liberal agenda on first Brexit, and then presumably everything else, only further exacerbates this process.
If one wants to give the Corbyn leadership some credit, one might say they at least have some vestigial awareness of the danger taking this path entails. When Transport Secretary Chris Grayling recently said that blocking Brexit would 'open the door to extremist populist political forces in this country of the kind we see in other countries in Europe’, Labour’s David Lammy accused him of ‘gutter politics’ and ‘appeasement’ while Nick Ryan of Hope Not Hate said the remark ‘simply plays into the hands of those extremists seeking to use Brexit as a platform to boost their profile.’
While Grayling’s timing may well have been cynically motivated, the observation is not wrong. What most of the political, economic and media elite have wanted since the Brexit vote is as close to neo-liberalism as usual as possible, with the minimum of disruption emanating from this democratic aberration. Should they succeed, any semi-competent populist right movement would be able to adopt a narrative of class and democratic betrayal, and position themselves as the alternative to the entire condescending liberal establishment. It’s a narrative that would have resonance for one simple reason: there would be a good deal of truth to it.
And where the BNP took over half a million votes at the 2010 general election, close to a million in the 2009 Euro election, and UKIP 3.8 million votes in 2015, this narrative would in the first instance have a pool of 17 million disproportionately working class Leave voters to pitch to. So while middle-class ultra-Remainers like to pitch the idea that Brexit = fascism, it is the contempt for democratic expression, and the longer-term fundamental retreat from class politics by the left, that creates the imminent risk. Furthermore, there is nothing the Labour party can do to address this: it is a task for the class itself and those who believe in it as the ultimate agent of change.
Where is this from/who said it?
Yeh we know where it ends when the publick have a sayStarmer keeps going off-message.
Tories and Corbyn are consistent. This needs to be kept to parliament, the public must not be involved.
Starmer keeps going off-message.
Tories and Corbyn are consistent. This needs to be kept to parliament, the public must not be involved.
cupid stunt said:Meanwhile remain groups are already using fake news in Facebook advertising, apparently brexit threatens endangered animals
What sort? Furry cuddly animals?
I dimly remember something about there having been a referendum already.
You’re on!Yada yada, wake up Sheeple etc. Stuff your words, show me your money!
£20 says we won't have a no deal Brexit by the end of March.
A car bomb's gone off in Derry.
BBC's reporting it as londonderryYep it happened at about 8 30
In front of courthouse.
I know it’s a neo-liberal organization. And i’m sure Corbyn and JRM (both not fans of the EU) have different reasons for an exit. That said I do think the Tories will use it as an excuse to asset strip the country. As to remain Tories...OK they’re not a monolithic group with identical opinions but come ‘no-deal’ they’ll all try and profit from it. I just wish people on the left (my side) woul stop calling them stupid. You see a lot of that on CiF also. Look at the track record since 1979. They’ve pretty much achieved everything they set out to achieve. Brexit’ll be their endgame.You do understand that the tory party - the one with these medium-long term evil plans you briefly outline - supported and campaigned to remain in the EU and that most tory MPs today still want to remain. Would that not suggest that if you are correct about their intentions then these super competent politicians deciding that they can best achieve this under the aegis of the EU (probably looking at the EU doing what you outline in country after country in europe over the last decade+) then this throws up[ serious doubtsd about your and others analysis of what both the EU and remain is?
You’re on!
That's not really much in that that responds to what I postedI know it’s a neo-liberal organization. And i’m sure Corbyn and JRM (both not fans of the EU) have different reasons for an exit. That said I do think the Tories will use it as an excuse to asset strip the country. As to remain Tories...OK they’re not a monolithic group with identical opinions but come ‘no-deal’ they’ll all try and profit from it. I just wish people on the left (my side) woul stop calling them stupid. You see a lot of that on CiF also. Look at the track record since 1979. They’ve pretty much achieved everything they set out to achieve. Brexit’ll be their endgame.
em...the norm is to donate it to the server fundDone.
Can I have an independent witness that if there is not a no deal Brexit by March 30th Ming owes me £20 please?
BBC's reporting it as londonderry
It’s a bet. I’ll pay up if i lose. And funnily enough i hope i do.Done.
Can I have an independent witness that if there is not a no deal Brexit by March 30th Ming owes me £20 please?
I think a lot of remain Tories are lying about being remainers (including Cameron). I think if we leave the EU we’ll be toast economically. Yes, its full of neo-liberal technocrats but you can’t reform anything from outside the tent.That's not really much in that that responds to what I posted