DexterTCN
Troy and Abed in the morning
I think the key is that there's no more negotiation.Aah, the key word is 'intends'.
That's it. Take it or leave it.
I think the key is that there's no more negotiation.Aah, the key word is 'intends'.
Definite prediction in this area is a mug's game, but I think it's more likely that the May deal will be voted down in parliament and then abandoned."mays deal" vs "remain" as a referendum question?
will be bitterly resented by many leavers. nobody but Theresa May and her remaining band of gimps will campaign for the deal.
be kind of funny though.
"mays deal" vs "remain" as a referendum question?
will be bitterly resented by many leavers. nobody but Theresa May and her remaining band of gimps will campaign for the deal.
be kind of funny though.
noWrong, IMO.
That the UK will be leaving anyway has already been determined; in other words, it's a done deal. Therefore, even if there is a second referendum, the only question can revolve around HOW the UK leaves. So something along the lines of: May's deal or No deal, wouldn't you agree?
Wrong, IMO.
That the UK will be leaving anyway has already been determined; in other words, it's a done deal. Therefore, even if there is a second referendum, the only question can revolve around HOW the UK leaves. So something along the lines of: May's deal or No deal, wouldn't you agree?
I think Parliament would have to simultaneously repeal the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 that itself repealed the 1972 EC Act.that ref question is not what im suggesting - its one that's doing the rounds
and also - no matter how many times you say "its a done deal" it does not make it fact. Parliament will almost certainly reject mays deal - and will definitely revoke article 50 before allowing the uk to leave with no deal on march 29th.
if we get to a 2nd ref - remain will definitely be one of the options, its moot weather "no deal" will be. Its parliament who get to decide this - nobody else. And they will never allow the two options they most oppose (no deal and mays deal) as the only options.
you'll be very disappointed that what happens bears no resemblance to your apocalyptic scenarioI don't want it to happen but if this can't be resolved, which looks like the case, maybe the only thing left to focus minds is the harshest of the harsh.
The springboard could be the UK refusing to pay what it already owes, which is the 39 billion I am assuming. That could be followed by forced repatriation of UK nationals in the EU and EU nationals in the UK, a militarized border on the island of Ireland, Gibraltar isolated on it's land crossing. No UK flights over EU airspace, no security cooperation at all, imports and exports between the UK and the EU being halted, or halted by checks that turns the UK motorway network into a huge car park. No imports or exports of vital medical supplies between the UK and the EU. Workplaces that depend on EU trade being closed down due to the halting of trade.
Bring it on, leave means leave after all, if the UK can't get it's act together then isolation from all aspects of the EU would be a practical manifestation of leave means leave.
Not project fear, project give the UK population what it apparently voted for.
Harsh reality might cut through theorizing and posturing and focus minds, because so far feck all is working.
The right party of capital would never do this; not because they care about the human cost, but because this would threaten rates of accumulation.I don't want it to happen but if this can't be resolved, which looks like the case, maybe the only thing left to focus minds is the harshest of the harsh.
The springboard could be the UK refusing to pay what it already owes, which is the 39 billion I am assuming. That could be followed by forced repatriation of UK nationals in the EU and EU nationals in the UK, a militarized border on the island of Ireland, Gibraltar isolated on it's land crossing. No UK flights over EU airspace, no security cooperation at all, imports and exports between the UK and the EU being halted, or halted by checks that turns the UK motorway network into a huge car park. No imports or exports of vital medical supplies between the UK and the EU. Workplaces that depend on EU trade being closed down due to the halting of trade.
Bring it on, leave means leave after all, if the UK can't get it's act together then isolation from all aspects of the EU would be a practical manifestation of leave means leave.
Not project fear, project give the UK population what it apparently voted for.
Harsh reality might cut through theorizing and posturing and focus minds, because so far feck all is working.
i think you're wrong but it won't happen anywayThe right party of capital would never do this; not because they care about the human cost, but because this would threaten rates of accumulation.
The fact that it won't happen might suggest that I'm not wrong?i think you're wrong but it won't happen anyway
i don't think it will be up to the right party of capitalThe fact that it won't happen might suggest that I'm not wrong?
that ref question is not what im suggesting - its one that's doing the rounds
Just to be clear, I didn't write that you suggested the text.
and also - no matter how many times you say "its a done deal" it does not make it fact. Parliament will almost certainly reject mays deal - and will definitely revoke article 50 before allowing the uk to leave with no deal on march 29th.
So what you're talking about isn't in fact a second referendum at all; it's not a follow-up referendum but rather a (replacement) referendum as if the one in 2016 never happened. Is that what you're saying?
if we get to a 2nd ref - remain will definitely be one of the options, its moot weather "no deal" will be. Its parliament who get to decide this - nobody else. And they will never allow the two options they most oppose (no deal and mays deal) as the only options.
She won't go down with the ship, she'll be captain Bob Bob Bob
only if she weighs the same as a duckIf she floats does that signify she is a witch?
I think the key is that there's no more negotiation.
That's it. Take it or leave it.
if the orange vole in the attic swallows a mandible then the geese are singing east for humbugsIf a new referendum is a replacement one as if the 2016 one never took place, then the board is completely blank and May's deal doesn't have a basis anymore.
if the orange vole in the attic swallows a mandible then the geese are singing east for humbugs
between michaelmas and candlemas, except on crowleymasI thought that only applied before Michaelmas!
Every fourth year?between michaelmas and candlemas, except on crowleymas
third and seventhEvery fourth year?
Quite so; the 200 will require various elements of the left parties of capital to help effect the rescue.i don't think it will be up to the right party of capital
it's less a rescue and more an undignified scrambleQuite so; the 200 will require various elements of the left parties of capital to help effect the rescue.
if the orange vole in the attic swallows a mandible then the geese are singing east for humbugs