Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is America burning? (Black Lives Matter protests, civil unrest and riots 2020)

Curious as to what you mean, do you think police all over the country have instructions to basically hurt people who are out at the demonstrations as much as possible regardless of whether they’re violating any law or curfew etc but not to kill them?

I can’t validate this video from a few days ago, but as Pickman’s says, they have their orders, & they’re in control.

“Don’t kill ‘em, hit ‘em hard”

 
I thought this video is maybe worth a watch because it provides a useful basic overview of the situation by placing police violence in historical and contemporary context, and it also posits potential ways forward, rooted in community self organising and social solidarity, which sounds good to me at least.
 
Some people like demonstrating knowledge, heartless to deprive them of the chance.

Boogaloo members appear to hold conflicting ideological views with some identifying as anarchists and others rejecting formal titles. Some pockets of the group have espoused white supremacy while others reject it. But they have at least two things in common: an affinity for toting around guns in public and a "boogaloo" rallying cry, which is commonly viewed as code for another US civil war.


it would be heartless to deprive you of the chance to look the rest up yourself.
 
Boogaloo members appear to hold conflicting ideological views with some identifying as anarchists and others rejecting formal titles. Some pockets of the group have espoused white supremacy while others reject it. But they have at least two things in common: an affinity for toting around guns in public and a "boogaloo" rallying cry, which is commonly viewed as code for another US civil war.


it would be heartless to deprive you of the chance to look the rest up yourself.

Apart from the in-group bit at the end that's helpful. I had heard of the Boogaloos but didn't know what stance if any they had over the George Floyd protests.
 
Bellingcat have published some useful stuff on it as well.

 
It's being reported that the entire Buffalo PD goon squad has resigned “in disgust” at the suspension of two of its members for fucking up that older dude and making blood pump out of his ear, because they're super classy, not total snowflakes, and definitely all about the justice:



 
Bellingcat have published some useful stuff on it as well.


Thanks, that's an interesting-looking piece, am reading it now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LDC
Not to protest about one of them pushing an old bloke down and putting him in hospital with blood coming out of the back of his head then.
theyre right to resign - that's their job! its what they're paid to do! And now its not okay somehow? must be very confusing for them
 
Bellingcat have published some useful stuff on it as well.

Just read that long piece -- it's scarey shit! :eek: :( :mad:

I hope I go through my (real) life never meeting anyone like those types

And I have no plans to go anywhere near the US any time soon .....
 
Violence and force runs through police training like town names through seaside rock - though much of it is couched in neutral language.

See this standard manual:


It does not say ‘Right lads, get stuck in and hammer the crap out of them, then fabricate your notes afterwards’. But it uses language to normalise forceful behaviour, it rationalises violence at all stages of an interaction, it amplifies perceived risk faced whilst minimising actual harm delivered.

Then consider the nature of practical training - typically of younger recruits in groups or cohorts, with instruction delivered by older mentors, with drills and formations to emphasise the need for conformity and uniformity. ‘Compliance techniques’. ‘Defensive tactics’. ‘Primary control skills’. These labels amount to psychological free passes - they give reasonable, positive, non-violent names to often unreasonable, negative, violent actions. But then it is harder to put a weapon in the average person's hand, point to some random nearby, and order them to “Maim that guy.” “Maim him?! WTF? Why?” Human instinct draws us back from that.

But condition a person with training, emphasise their own goodness, and their belonging to a group which identifies as good, nurture a strong group identity and encourage them to identify more with those inside the group than anything outside of it, and mitigate uncomfortable feelings around violence and force by downgrading their perception of what violence and force are [when committed by you or your fellow ‘good group’ members], by literally renaming acts of violence, by building muscle memory for violent acts, by developing bland, generic language for describing violent acts, and by building resentment for questioning or critical or non-deferential behaviours in those outside of the ‘good group’, then, shit, you've changed the game.
As an aside, Christopher Browning's Ordinary Men, which summarises a study of one unit's involvement in the Holocaust, based on statements made by the participants themselves, is grimly instructive.

The unit is Reserve Police Battalion 101, a 500-strong group of very average, middle-aged German men, conscripted into a paramilitary/gendarmerie-type police formation in a time of war, and sent to Poland. They are armed and uniformed, but they are not soldiers, and fight no battles. They are police officers, but they enforce no laws and detect no crimes. They are there to guard, to threaten, to search, to coerce, and ultimately to kill. They are not told explicitly what they will be doing before they go. Even after they arrive, they are only given very narrow, task-orientated instructions. And yet without in any real sense being forced to, together these ordinary men killed, murdered, slaughtered 83,000 Jews - 38,000 by gunshot in ‘police actions’, and 43,000 ‘deported’ to Treblinka death camp. Those whose lives were directly extinguished by the men of 101 were typically shot at very close range, close enough to feel warm breath on their skin, close enough for the shooters to be ‘gruesomely besmirched’ by every bullet they delivered into soft flesh and brittle skull and spongy organ. 166 souls snuffed out, 76 at touching distance, on average, per ordinary man.

Browning largely strips away ideological motivations, and focuses on what humans can be made to do to other humans, not by force, but by circumstance and expectation and by the process of breaking down ghastly and complex politico-military policy goals into small, repetitive, discrete parcels of horrific labour for individuals to carry out - divorcing thought from action.

Some take to the job much more enthusiastically than others. Some are transparently sadistic. But some quietly tell their NCO or their officer that they can't stomach any more, today, and are given less distressing jobs for now, taking this thing to that place, or guarding a perimeter, or taking a message to headquarters. Many rely on alcohol to fog over their feelings. Yet at no point does everybody stop. At all times the massacres and train embarkations continue. The machine trundles on, even if periodically parts are swapped out.

It becomes not a matter of this is wrong, but of I cannot do this right now. These ordinary men are not - unlike their victims - compelled at bayonet point; they compel themselves through deference to the whole, to power, to that which they consider ‘authority’, to the body of men to which they belong. To some there is the commitment to Reich und Volk, to the bonds of blood and soil, to a national duty, but mostly it is the in sickness and in health conscious stoicism of codependent relationships. Men doing bad things because if they don't do them, the man beside them will have to do their share too. Men motivated not by a moral code, but by a desire not to be seen as letting down his comrades. Men more worried by shame than slaughter. Men who respond to the horror by considering that this is horrific but it will nevertheless be done, rather than this is horrific and must be stopped. Men who see ways to personally abdicate their direct involvement in the horror - by physical absence, mental absence, ethical justification, pragmatic justification - but who never seek to end the horror itself, because the horror is inevitable and a fact and I just have to do what I have to do to get through this. Me, myself, I; not him, her, them. Pain and trauma is a personal tragedy, not something inflicted upon the actual victims, whose faces quickly all blend into anonymity.

And does any of this matter at all, to the 83,000 corpses they leave behind? No. Dead men, women and children cannot absolve you of anything, not least your murder of them; no more than George Floyd can look upon his own cadaver and the choking chemical clouds that hang over America's towns and cities and consider this to be ‘a great day’. All that is left is the living, and the living can frame their actions any way they choose.

But when the living choose to frame matters in terms of how I didn't personally do anything wrong, yet still stand in armoured phalanxes of anonymous brute force because thin blue line or law and order or it's not perfect but it's all we've got, the body count arithmetic never really changes. You're just one goon in a helmet who skived off for half an hour because your nerves couldn't take whetting your nightstick just now; the other 499 can take up the slack on your 166.

And in thirty minutes' time you will always find reason to rejoin the ranks, because at any point you could have stopped this, and you did not. You always saw yourself as one of 500, never one of 83,000.
 

Attachments

  • ORDINARY MEN - BROWNING - 1992 - Chapter 5.pdf
    2.1 MB · Views: 13
  • ORDINARY MEN - BROWNING - 1992 - Chapter 7.pdf
    2.2 MB · Views: 8
  • ORDINARY MEN - BROWNING - 1992 - Chapter 9.pdf
    1.5 MB · Views: 7
Back
Top Bottom