Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
yes you can, as i've just proved.Can't do quoting on phone.
yes you can, as i've just proved.Can't do quoting on phone.
You've proved that it is possible not that I know how to do it. Anyway, andy kept defending the article. It's my job to say why?yes you can, as i've just proved.
go on then, say whyYou've proved that it is possible not that I know how to do it. Anyway, andy kept defending the article. It's my job to say why?
you're not doing your job
ViolentPanda Err.. Have you read the article we've supposedly been discussing? It says the opposite, that the events were falsely inflated by the police report, and the lying women.
It's a shit job. Downs tools.you're not doing your job
maybe we can move on now thenIt's a shit job. Downs tools.
You've proved that it is possible not that I know how to do it. Anyway, andy kept defending the article. It's my job to say why?
I'm posting about demonstrably false racist propaganda and asociated conspiracy theories because that's part of the context of this story.
Given that such propaganda is demonstrably occuring, it's entirely legitimate to ask for any given account in this context how sound the evidence for it appears to be and whether its strong enough to form conclusions one way or another.
Fake 'brothel vouchers' for refugees stir far-right hatred
Original story in German (along with what looks like a ton of other far right propaganda being debunked) here - Freikarte fürs Bordell für Flüchtlinge?
OK, lets give this a go...
I want to qualify this right from the beginning by saying this is what I think from the information I have available (largely from this thread and the mainstream media), and I don't think anyone knew two months ago, knows now or will ever know exactly and completely what happened, so the following comes with that caveat attached.
It appears that large numbers of sexual assaults, other assaults and robberies were committed in the crowds around Cologne station, that some were reported to the police at the time, some were possibly witnessed by members of the police at the time, and many of them were committed by people who the victims described as being of foreign appearance. None of that's in dispute, certainly by me. I believe what the victims are saying, including what they say about the people committing the attacks, and I've never said otherwise.
But as the story developed and unfolded, things quickly get muddied and established facts got confused with supposed facts and supposed explanations for those established and supposed facts. There's nothing new or unusual about that, it happens with most news stories.
One thing is that it appears that police were slow to realise the scale of what was happening, which may or may not be understandable given the logistics of the situation as it unfolded on the night, I don't know. It also appears that the police may have been slow to release info to the German media, and that the media may have been slow in reporting the story, which may also be understandable given the confusion and the new-year-and-after holiday.
It's been suggested, right from the beginning, that these delays in responding and reporting were the result of deliberate suppression (motivated by leftie-inspired political correctness, obvs...) I'm utterly skeptical about this, TBH, because I don't think that's how either the police or the MSM work, and because it's an all-too-convenient trope for leftie bashers here and elsewhere to jump on, but jump on it they did, to the extent that it quickly became accepted fact to many, even though there are other equally or more likely explanations which were generally ignored or dismissed out of hand.
It also appears that as time went on and the story unfolded, more victims reported being attacked. There's nothing surprising or suspicious about this, many people who've been assaulted don't report it immediately, for all sorts of reasons, and it's possible that some victims only reported what had happened to them when they realised that it was part of a larger thing that was reported in the media, and that they might otherwise not have reported it, if that makes sense. This doesn't mean, as has been suggested on this thread, that those who mention that some of the victims have only come forward after media reports are in any way doubting what those those victims have said.
As far as the "foreigner" aspect of the story goes, I believe the descriptions given by the victims, and I accept that many/most/even all of the attackers may have appeared to be foreigners, or may have possessed asylum seeker papers (they may even have been foreigners or asylum seekers, though one doesn't follow the other automatically), I'm not seeking to deny or even downplay that.
What I am objecting to is focussing on that aspect (by sections of the media, by far-right opportunists and by the usual leftie-bashers on this thread) to push that as the dominant part of this story, and to whip up a moral panic on the back of it about western women being under threat from sexual-aggressive foreigners, because that's one of the oldest and most well-worn rightwing tropes going, and it's sickening to see it wheeled out yet again.
I hope that answers your question to some extent, though there's probably bits I've missed out, other things I could have said, etc.
it's not intended to 'debunk' the victim accounts, as you perfectly well know.
What I actually said was, here's a bunch of clear evidence of hostile social media propaganda about refugees.
I've argued that in an emotionally charged context such as this one, it's important to pay close attention to evidence, especially given that it's clear that many fake stories are in circulation.
You lot have pretty consistently pulled this sort of shit (strawmanning, drama bombing, demands to condemn etc) whenever people want to pay attention to the evidence and try to separate it from propaganda, for a hundred odd pages now ...
hundreds of sexually aggressive foreigners acting in unison right across Germany the same night
around 1000 sexually aggressive north african foreigners attacked these women right in front of police
outrageous actions by thousands..literally thousands ...of no good, no mark cunts
lets have a few million more of these guys over...
All that illustrates is that CR is given to a bit of hyperbole.If this doesn't perfectly illustrate the trope I've mentioned, I don't know what does.
Even his little gang of leftie-bashing fellow travellers ...
good cos there weren't any questions in your postNo further questions...
it's not intended to 'debunk' the victim accounts, as you perfectly well know.
What I actually said was, here's a bunch of clear evidence of hostile social media propaganda about refugees.
I've argued that in an emotionally charged context such as this one, it's important to pay close attention to evidence, especially given that it's clear that many fake stories are in circulation.
You lot have pretty consistently pulled this sort of shit (strawmanning, drama bombing, demands to condemn etc) whenever people want to pay attention to the evidence and try to separate it from propaganda, for a hundred odd pages now ...
. It leaves the field wide open to the far right.
The Cologne events have been a turning point in a public debate in which we have seen two clear sides develop; a right wing “uprising”, with racist positions being strongly articulated within public discourse, and attacks on refugees and refugee centers also taking place ( der Spiegel [a German newspaper]calls this “the dark side of Germany”); on the other hand there was “the bright side of Germany” which consisted of an unexpected wave of solidarity including “Welcoming Committees”, people donating clothes, food, and even (temporarily) shelter for those arriving here. Until early winter we had both sides in the debate. The right used a ‘feminist” discourse to frame the events in Cologne in a bid to strengthen nationalist arguments against refugees. From then there have been many references to these attacks from both the right and mainstream politicians. The image of the “criminal foreigner” or the “criminal refugee” is back in public discourse and has been one of the main arguments for strengthening the powers of the state to quickly deport refugees that break the law here. The “rapefugee” slogan is now seen at right wing demonstrations more frequently.
Sarah: The debates around the attacks never focused on sexual harassment as a general social problem. For instance, the first women who reported incidents to the police were sent away with comments like “we can’t do anything about it… this is nothing unusual.” None of the mainstream media or political parties used this as an opportunity to talk about sexual harassment in German society, how this is seen and prosecuted within the law, or to discuss how to strengthen women’s rights. What they went for was a specific racist argument that blamed Muslims and Islamic culture for oppressing women. It was only the quantity of attacks which forced the police and Mayor of Cologne to hold a press conference where the nature of these attacks became politicized. At the conference the Mayor gave out ‘tips’ for women which included “stay an arm’s length away from men” and “don’t smile at them and encourage them to talk to you.”
This is a very interesting piece, the first two thirds anyway, not so much when they retreat in the anti-fascist arena, but even there it demonstrates that the german 80-90s anti-fascist tradition has taken on board much that anti-fascists here still haven't - that here it is often nearer the anti-racists talked about in the article:
Crisis and the Return to the Nation: Dismantling the Right Ecology in Germany
Sarah: The debates around the attacks never focused on sexual harassment as a general social problem. For instance, the first women who reported incidents to the police were sent away with comments like “we can’t do anything about it… this is nothing unusual.”
Currently, victims in Germany reporting a rape to police must not only demonstrate that they verbally declined sex but also that they physically resisted their assailant.
Why are they changing the law, then?
strange thing for a lawyer to askIs the law the central issue here?
Is the law the central issue here?