petee
no gods, no malarkey
excellent summary.it is wierd how he seems to get a pass and is regarded as "a bit of a charchter" when he was very much a capricious tyrant who seemed to think nothing of executing advisors and wives who failed him in some way. And he casued a siesmic repture in englands social fabric and international relations just to sastify his own personal desires and greed.
THe enlglish reformation is a wierd one in that its main driverwas Henry breaking with rome it as a way of divorcing his wife in order to a. persue his obsesson with Anne Bolyen and/or b. secure a legitmate male heir.
Cramner and Cromwell used this as a way of pushing England towards protestantism - and Henry seemed happy to go along with it as a way of getting rid of Catherin of Aragorn and then later enriching himself on the proceeds of the disolution of the monestrys (which also bought the support of the noblilty) . Cromwell seems to have been the key player here - im not sure whether he was driven by deeply held religious convictions - and/or a machiveioan genius for wealth and power (which bit him on the arse big time after the anne of leaves debacle)
Who knows what would have happened Catherine had provided a male her - or if the pope had sanctioned a divorce? The History of England and Britain would have been very, very different.
more should be said (in general, not pointing any fingers) about Catherine's bravery in refusing to go along with Henry's arrogance.