equationgirl
Respect my existence or expect my resistance
It's King Canute.Either your point is mis-placed or you do not understand the tale of King Cnut and the tide.
It's King Canute.Either your point is mis-placed or you do not understand the tale of King Cnut and the tide.
i thought he was making a punning point about you being something of a cnut.
It's King Canute.
i see you believe Apryl's claim that i am leader of these boardsOh I see.
That did cross my mind but I credit editor with more perspicacity than that.
Perhaps I am wrong on that front and should categorise him as belonging to your serried ranks of keyboard bound hard men with little courage but much vibrant insults, hurled from as far a distance as possible in the crudest of terms.
A slingshot army of the lame.
i see you believe Apryl's claim that i am leader of these boards
i have yet to see any reason why i should not treat you with anything but 'arrogant contempt' - or any other sort of contempt, for that matter.Not going to even bother with that.
If you have a point, make it.
Being cryptic is not big or clever, it means thst you are, at best, being a dick and treating your correspondent with arrogant contempt.
There's no categorical conclusion on that but he is usually referred to in academic circles, especially when I studied him, as King Cnut.
But good point, well made and valuable contribution etc...
And you'd know, that's how you seem to be treating anyone who disagrees with you.Not going to even bother with that.
If you have a point, make it.
Being cryptic is not big or clever, it means thst you are, at best, being a dick and treating your correspondent with arrogant contempt.
i have yet to see any reason why i should not treat you with anything but 'arrogant contempt' - or any other sort of contempt, for that matter.
We're all still waiting for you to apologise for the racism accusations, by the way.
And the reason the third guy in the OP is being held up as an example of all that is wrong in this is because he's the only one that talks about watching his investment skyrocket. He's blatantly in it for the money, not as a home for himself or his family. Not because he's from outside the UK.
that'd be fine, only it's a load of auld bollocks. you've earned my 'arrogant contempt' through your lying and questionable posts.But that's your default setting in any event.
Trying to persuade you down from your high horse is more or less impossible.
Cnut the Great[2] (Old Norse: Knútr inn ríki;[3] c. 985 or 995 – 12 November 1035), more commonly known as Canute, was a king of Denmark, England, Norway, and parts of Sweden, together often referred to as the Anglo-Scandinavian or North Sea Empire. After his death, the deaths of his heirs within a decade, and the Norman conquest of England in 1066, his legacy was largely lost to history. Historian Norman Cantor has made the statement that he was "the most effective king in Anglo-Saxon history", despite not being Anglo-Saxon.[4]
yes, you have shown your mendacity quite meticulously. but in your place it's not the sort of thing i'd boast of.I've shown that already, quite meticulously!
Oh I see.
That did cross my mind but I credit editor with more perspicacity than that.
Perhaps I am wrong on that front and should categorise him as belonging to your serried ranks of keyboard bound hard men with little courage but much vibrant insults, hurled from as far a distance as possible in the crudest of terms.
A slingshot army of the lame.
It wasn't a literal quote, that being obvious as it wasn't in quote form or "in quotes". I thought you had studied such things with academics?But he does not say "skyrocket"!
it's been established above that yer man's an ignorant muddleheaded wanker. so i don't think it's entirely fair to take him to task for this.It wasn't a literal quote, that being obvious as it wasn't in quote form or "in quotes". I thought you had studied such things with academics?
And from the wikipedia page (probably not highbrow enough for you academic types):
So either name is correct.
I have sciatica so find it quite offensive but not as offensive as someone with a serious leg injury obviously.the lame you say. Isn't that rather insulting to those who have limited mobility. etc.
It wasn't a literal quote, that being obvious as it wasn't in quote form or "in quotes". I thought you had studied such things with academics?
The thread title is a misrepresentation of what the man said and that's suspicious, as any misrepresentation should be.
As someone with a physical disability I do find use of the word 'lame' as a perjorative on the boards quite offensive to be honest. Sometimes I pick people up on it, sometimes I don't, depending on if I can be arsed with the backlash.the lame you say. Isn't that rather insulting to those who have limited mobility. etc.
I recall that before getting sciatica you were openly mocking the disabled, even unto the point of pretending to lick a window. Once you got sciatica however, you changed your tuneI have sciatica so find it quite offensive but not as offensive as someone with a serious leg injury obviously.
I have arthritis in four verterbrae, meaning limited movement sometimes.I have sciatica so find it quite offensive but not as offensive as someone with a serious leg injury obviously.
i think you can each be equally offended.I have arthritis in four verterbrae, meaning limited movement sometimes.
In disability top trumps should you be more offended than me at the use of 'lame' or is it the other way round?
I was mocking an earlier argument of Diamond's and you win because I only have it in two to my knowledge.I have arthritis in four verterbrae, meaning limited movement sometimes.
In disability top trumps should you be more offended than me at the use of 'lame' or is it the other way round?
Suspicious? Really?But that is key to how this whole affair has been brought to people's attention on this website.
The thread title is a misrepresentation of what the man said and that's suspicious, as any misrepresentation should be.