Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Greedy landlords rub their hands with glee as Londoners queue in the cold to buy flats

i thought he was making a punning point about you being something of a cnut.

Oh I see.

That did cross my mind but I credit editor with more perspicacity than that.

Perhaps I am wrong on that front and should categorise him as belonging to your serried ranks of keyboard bound hard men with little courage but much vibrant insults, hurled from as far a distance as possible in the crudest of terms.

A slingshot army of the lame.
 
h06989411
 
Oh I see.

That did cross my mind but I credit editor with more perspicacity than that.

Perhaps I am wrong on that front and should categorise him as belonging to your serried ranks of keyboard bound hard men with little courage but much vibrant insults, hurled from as far a distance as possible in the crudest of terms.

A slingshot army of the lame.
i see you believe Apryl's claim that i am leader of these boards
 
Not going to even bother with that.

If you have a point, make it.

Being cryptic is not big or clever, it means thst you are, at best, being a dick and treating your correspondent with arrogant contempt.
i have yet to see any reason why i should not treat you with anything but 'arrogant contempt' - or any other sort of contempt, for that matter.
 
There's no categorical conclusion on that but he is usually referred to in academic circles, especially when I studied him, as King Cnut.

But good point, well made and valuable contribution etc...
:rolleyes:

We're all still waiting for you to apologise for the racism accusations, by the way.

And the reason the third guy in the OP is being held up as an example of all that is wrong in this is because he's the only one that talks about watching his investment skyrocket. He's blatantly in it for the money, not as a home for himself or his family. Not because he's from outside the UK.
 
Not going to even bother with that.

If you have a point, make it.

Being cryptic is not big or clever, it means thst you are, at best, being a dick and treating your correspondent with arrogant contempt.
And you'd know, that's how you seem to be treating anyone who disagrees with you.
 
i have yet to see any reason why i should not treat you with anything but 'arrogant contempt' - or any other sort of contempt, for that matter.

But that's your default setting in any event.

Trying to persuade you down from your high horse is more or less impossible.
 
:rolleyes:

We're all still waiting for you to apologise for the racism accusations, by the way.

And the reason the third guy in the OP is being held up as an example of all that is wrong in this is because he's the only one that talks about watching his investment skyrocket. He's blatantly in it for the money, not as a home for himself or his family. Not because he's from outside the UK.

But he does not say "skyrocket"!
 
I've shown that already, quite meticulously!

But it seems to have become an article of faith for you.

You should ask yourself why that is the case.
 
And from the wikipedia page (probably not highbrow enough for you academic types):

Cnut the Great[2] (Old Norse: Knútr inn ríki;[3] c. 985 or 995 – 12 November 1035), more commonly known as Canute, was a king of Denmark, England, Norway, and parts of Sweden, together often referred to as the Anglo-Scandinavian or North Sea Empire. After his death, the deaths of his heirs within a decade, and the Norman conquest of England in 1066, his legacy was largely lost to history. Historian Norman Cantor has made the statement that he was "the most effective king in Anglo-Saxon history", despite not being Anglo-Saxon.[4]

So either name is correct.
 
Oh I see.

That did cross my mind but I credit editor with more perspicacity than that.

Perhaps I am wrong on that front and should categorise him as belonging to your serried ranks of keyboard bound hard men with little courage but much vibrant insults, hurled from as far a distance as possible in the crudest of terms.

A slingshot army of the lame.


the lame you say. Isn't that rather insulting to those who have limited mobility. etc.
 
It wasn't a literal quote, that being obvious as it wasn't in quote form or "in quotes". I thought you had studied such things with academics?
it's been established above that yer man's an ignorant muddleheaded wanker. so i don't think it's entirely fair to take him to task for this.
 
It wasn't a literal quote, that being obvious as it wasn't in quote form or "in quotes". I thought you had studied such things with academics?

But that is key to how this whole affair has been brought to people's attention on this website.

The thread title is a misrepresentation of what the man said and that's suspicious, as any misrepresentation should be.
 
The thread title is a misrepresentation of what the man said and that's suspicious, as any misrepresentation should be.

An argument that was made quite reasonably on about page four or five without attracting torrents of abuse because the posters who made the argument weren't ignorant cocks. If you're going to bend over with your trousers down you can't really complain when people queue up to give you a kick.
 
the lame you say. Isn't that rather insulting to those who have limited mobility. etc.
As someone with a physical disability I do find use of the word 'lame' as a perjorative on the boards quite offensive to be honest. Sometimes I pick people up on it, sometimes I don't, depending on if I can be arsed with the backlash.

But it's a bit rich of Diamond to complain about 'epileptic trees' being offensive to epileptics notably himself when he's happy to mock others with disabilities.
 
I have sciatica so find it quite offensive but not as offensive as someone with a serious leg injury obviously.
I recall that before getting sciatica you were openly mocking the disabled, even unto the point of pretending to lick a window. Once you got sciatica however, you changed your tune
 
I have sciatica so find it quite offensive but not as offensive as someone with a serious leg injury obviously.
I have arthritis in four verterbrae, meaning limited movement sometimes.

In disability top trumps should you be more offended than me at the use of 'lame' or is it the other way round?
 
I have arthritis in four verterbrae, meaning limited movement sometimes.

In disability top trumps should you be more offended than me at the use of 'lame' or is it the other way round?
I was mocking an earlier argument of Diamond's and you win because I only have it in two to my knowledge.
 
But that is key to how this whole affair has been brought to people's attention on this website.

The thread title is a misrepresentation of what the man said and that's suspicious, as any misrepresentation should be.
Suspicious? Really?
 
Back
Top Bottom