Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Greedy landlords rub their hands with glee as Londoners queue in the cold to buy flats

Fuck off. Your the one with the problem.

So you don't get it do you.

The main point is that the person in the article was being highlighted because he came from the "outside" and there is supposed to be an "inside" which the article helps to construct. And anyone from the "outside" that enters the "inside" has to either pay some kind of sanction, suffer from some degree of opprobium and/or alter their behaviour.
 
There have been maybe four or five people supporting your groundless arguments.
How many have supported your claims?
Are they your lackeys - maybe, maybe not - it probably depends on the definition
So you're now trying to defend your position by attacking anyone who doesn't agree with you by way of yet another piece of tacky and groundless finger pointing.

Stay classy.
 
How many have supported your claims? So you're now trying to defend your position by attacking anyone who doesn't agree with you by way of yet another piece of tacky and groundless finger pointing.

Stay classy.

I don't care how many people support my claims because they stand on their own logic.

I don't need an army of supporters.

I stand alone in that respect and am all the stronger for it.
 
And, I think it is rather bizarre that we're focusing on Mr Chiu in our discussion when there were numerous other applicants quoted in the original article - is it maybe because he is foreign and what does that imply?

Go on then genius. Explain this. Objecting to someone because they are foreign implys what?
 
God, this is tiresome. You can make many more intelligent/interesting arguments if you want, although all incorrect.
 
1269341207-pwned1.jpg
 
There have been maybe four or five people supporting your groundless arguments.

Are they your lackeys - maybe, maybe not - it probably depends on the definition.

But I know that if I were in your position, I would not rely on the following proposition to found my arguments:

"all my mates think the same"

And then - most importantly - where is your evidence?
As you're now making a formal plea for other posters to come forward and say yes, you clearly did insinuate that the editor was motivated by racist feelings, well here i am say that yes you clearly did insinuate that the editor was motivated by racist feelings.

Does Diamond lack all sense of personal honour, has Diamond been utterly caught out by they those he considers his intellectual inferior, has he been writing pompous crap easily dismantled? Maybe, maybe not - it probably depends on the various definitions. If i was minded to do so i'd suggest he's helpfully put all his failings on public display in one thread. If i was minded to - but clearly i'm above such things.
 
Last edited:
I'm abroad in Slovenia this week so you lot will be spared my presence. I trust that you'll take advantage to conduct an appropriate love in.
 
Maybe it's just me, but the last few pages had more than a whiff of an Awesome Wells argument about them :hmm:
 
Back
Top Bottom