I see the bond market has gone into an inverted yield curve too.Not a nice day for equities. US markets really tanking.
Tanking to a position 25% up on their low point in December?Not a nice day for equities. US markets really tanking.
I see the bond market has gone into an inverted yield curve too.
Bad shit going down.
Buy tinned toms and dried pasta, AK47s and toilet roll.
(There is another recession coming)
Hmm... That's a very arbitrary comparison point!Tanking to a position 25% up on their low point in December?
If you want to talking about things tanking, you have to compare it to what tanking really means. It doesn’t mean 5% off its record high.Hmm... That's a very arbitrary comparison point!
If you ignore that month, then we are bobbling around a low point that is below 2017.
The FTSE 100 is currently knocking on the door of 7100 after posting the ath of 7700 just a few weeks ago. 3 weeks for the UK's key index to lose over 8% - this is against a backdrop of sterling assets being unprecedentedly cheap. If you are still tracking the 100 or 250 then you either have inside knowledge, the faith of Job or are just waiting and hoping.If you want to talking about things tanking, you have to compare it to what tanking really means. It doesn’t mean 5% off its record high.
It’s an 8% drop from peak though, not trend. 7132 as we stand looks... ok-ish. Not great, not a collapse or anything.The FTSE 100 is currently knocking on the door of 7100 after posting the ath of 7700 just a few weeks ago. 3 weeks for the UK's key index to lose over 8% - this is against a backdrop of sterling assets being unprecedentedly cheap. If you are still tracking the 100 or 250 then you either have inside knowledge, the faith of Job or are just waiting and hoping.
The problem with this approach is that it's only invalidated once the indexes have dropped over 10% - and then it's too late.It’s an 8% drop from peak though, not trend. 7132 as we stand looks... ok-ish. Not great, not a collapse or anything.
The FTSE 100 is really odd at the moment though because it is largely companies who trade heavily outside the U.K. and so their value is propped up by a weak pound, as you say, but also hit by US trade wars and so on. The 250 is a better sign of the U.K. itself and that has been suppressed for a while because of Brexit.
Both of these indices are pretty stable over the year though, or the last 12 months. They peaked last August and troughed last December but if you smooth that high and low it’s all fairly steady. Frankly, things going up and down across a 10% range doesn’t mean much.
Apple stock. $90ish at the end of 2008, $380 now.
Just to show how these short terms ups and downs shouldn't be overreacted to, here is the FTSE 100 now:The FTSE 100 is currently knocking on the door of 7100 after posting the ath of 7700 just a few weeks ago. 3 weeks for the UK's key index to lose over 8% - this is against a backdrop of sterling assets being unprecedentedly cheap. If you are still tracking the 100 or 250 then you either have inside knowledge, the faith of Job or are just waiting and hoping.
The proposal, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, could potentially free $40 billion across the nation’s largest banks, according to a 2018 survey by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), the global trade group that has been lobbying for the rule change for years.
The proposal is subject to public comment and will likely face resistance from Democratic lawmakers and consumer groups, who have warned that chipping away at regulations put in place following the 2007-2009 financial crisis could sew the seeds of the next one.
One of the most important sources of financial market lubrication came under severe strain this week, raising concerns that the Federal Reserve’s attempt to unwind post-financial crisis intervention may have gone too far.
Repurchase agreements are the grease that keeps the financial system’s wheels spinning, allowing different market participants to borrow and lend to each other to cover short-term cash needs.
On Tuesday, the wheels stopped turning. The so-called repo rate soared to a high of 10 per cent, when it typically trades in line with the Federal Reserve’s target interest rate of between 2 per cent and 2.25 per cent. The New York branch of the Fed had to step in and inject tens of billions of cash into the system in an attempt to restore order, doubling down on Wednesday with a second short-term injection.
The lack of cash circulating in short-term money markets has pushed up the effective fed funds rate, the actual level at which banks lend to each other overnight. As a result, Hills says the CME’s tracker of rate decision probabilities may be reflecting the odds for the effective fed funds rate to remain elevated due to this week’s funding squeeze, rather than expectations for the fed funds target range going forward. The effective fed funds rate, the actual level at which banks lend overnight, jumped above the interest rate on reserves that bank keep in excess of their reserve requirements (IOER) by 15 basis points as of Monday.
Usually, this is seen as a temporary state of affairs because banks have no incentive to borrow from another bank when it could simply withdraw funds on deposit at the Fed, but the persistence of the fed funds rate above the IOER has raised questions whether the central bank is losing its grip over its benchmark interest rate.
Market participants have pointed to the sharp jump in the repurchase rate, or repo rate, on Monday and Tuesday as the most recent trigger for the higher fed funds rate. This key interest rate represents the amount that banks, dealers and hedge funds are charged for borrowing funds for a short period of time, in return for collateral such as Treasurys. This rate jumped as high as 8% on Tuesday, according to ICAP, even though it is usually expected to stick near the fed funds rate.
Investors tend to be nervous about a climb in repo rates as they’re usually associated with banking crises and credit crunches. Repo rates spiked back in the 2008 financial crisis when banks were unwilling to lend to each other amid questions about their solvency.
Analysts say a perfect storm of factors may have been responsible for the spike in repo rates this week.
The U.S. Treasury Department is rebuilding its cash reserves, after running them down to keep the government open, before Congress finally raised the federal debt ceiling in July. To do that the Treasury has been issuing a deluge of short term debt and parking the funds in its Treasury General Account (TGA) at the Fed.
In addition, the deadline for corporate tax payments in September fell on Monday. Investors pulled billions of dollars from short-term funding markets as companies redirected those funds to the Treasury Department. Analysts also cited the settlement of several debt auctions on Monday, and the lack of space on bond dealers' balance sheets.
They have been called “the men who plundered Europe”: a group of cowboy traders, seasoned tax lawyers and mathematical whizz kids who are alleged to have conspired in the heart of the City of London to siphon at least €60bn in taxpayers’ money from the state coffers of several EU countries.
In Britain, the so-called “cum-ex” scandal, named after the complex derivatives juggling act employed, gained little attention amid the frenzied debate around the UK’s departure from the European Union when the fraud scheme was discovered in 2017.
But in continental Europe what Le Monde has described as the “robbery of the century” has done almost as much to shape the view of Britain as Brexit itself. Dutch media has called it “organised crime in pinstripe suits” and one of the original German whistleblowers saying he now welcomes Britain’s exit from the EU in the hope it could weaken the influence of London investment banking on European financial institutions.
This week, a British former investment banker involved in developing the scheme for the first time gave the public an insight into how the scheme worked and what spurred on its architects.
Speaking at a regional court in Bonn, Martin Shields, one of two former bankers on trial for 34 instances of serious tax fraud between 2006 and 2011, painted a picture of a London banking scene which lured in the brightest scientists from the country’s top universities and used them to boost their profit margins – without teaching them about the moral and legal consequences of their actions in return.
And how much return if you cashed out today?Note that investing on 15 August, however -- the day of the post I'm replying to -- would have seen you with a 3.8% return if you cashed out today.
0.8%, actually, for the FTSE 100.And how much return if you cashed out today?
In a statement, the SFO said: "Following a thorough investigation and a detailed review of the available evidence, there will be no further charges brought in this case. This decision was taken in line with the test in the Code for Crown Prosecutors."
The code states that the evidence must support a realistic prospect of conviction and must be in the public interest.
bank run on Italy’s Monte dei Paschi bank
Chief executive Fabrizio Viola did not say how much money savers had withdrawn, or when the outflow began, though he said the fall in deposits was “limited” and that the bank could cope with it as he sought to reassure customers and investors.
Italian bank shares have lost 20% so far this year as investors, already rattled about global economic growth, have sold out of a sector with low profitability and about 200 billion euros ($218 billion) of loans that are unlikely to be repaid.
Monte Paschi - Italy’s third-biggest bank - has lost the most ground as it is perceived to be the most vulnerable; it has the highest level of bad loans as a proportion of assets and was the worst performer in a health check of eurozone lenders in 2014.
The Tuscan-based bank’s stock, which had plunged 15% on Monday and 14.4% on Tuesday, was suspended from trading several times after falling 18.2% on Wednesday. The plunge helped dragged down all other Italian banking stocks, with Carige shedding 12.7% and Banco Popolare falling more than 6%.
Viola said the plunge in Monte Paschi shares was not a reflection of the bank’s fundamentals, which he said had improved in the last quarter of 2015.
Italian court convicts Deutsche Bank, Nomura in Monte Paschi derivative trialDeutsche Bank woes deepen in Monte Paschi fraud case
16 May 2017
One of the largest banks in the world an alleged international criminal organization. Too big to fail.Deutsche Bank AG, on trial in Milan for allegedly helping Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA conceal losses, must face accusations that it was running an international criminal organization at the time.
MILAN (Reuters) - An Italian court has convicted 13 former bankers from Deutsche Bank, Nomura and Monte dei Paschi di Siena over derivative deals that prosecutors say helped the Tuscan bank hide losses in one of the country’s biggest financial scandals.
In recent years, instances of bankers being convicted of fraud have been relatively rare and experts said any conviction in this case would come as a surprise.
While few executives from major global banks have faced criminal charges for their roles in the financial crisis, there have been several convictions of senior bankers at smaller European lenders.
In 2017, four former managers of Spanish savings bank Caja de Ahorros del Mediterraneo, and former International Monetary Fund chief Rodrigo Rato were jailed by Spain's High Court in similar corruption cases related to the financial crisis.
LONDON (Reuters) - The unwillingness of the top four U.S. banks to lend cash combined with a burst of demand from hedge funds for secured funding could explain a recent spike in U.S. money market rates, the Bank for International Settlements said.
Cash available to banks for short-term funding all but dried up in late September, and interest rates deep in the plumbing of U.S. financial markets climbed into double digits.
That forced the Fed to make an emergency injection of billions of dollars for the first time since the global financial crisis more than a decade ago.
Pension funds, insurers, and financial institutions are now accepting negative yields on government bonds - they will pay money to hold them. There is simply nowhere else for them to put their money now in the rotting financial system. This is unprecedented at this scale.