No, it's been done until the final. Saarbrücken, for example, were at home this season in every round to the semifinal (and eliminated Karlsruhe, Bayern München, Eintracht Frankfurft and Borussia Mönchengladbach) of the DFB-Pokal. But the rule doesn't occur for 2. Bundesliga teams - they can be drawn to teams from the 1. Bundesliga away.Do they not just do this on the first round? Then it’s as it’s drawn…?
Aaaah thank you, that’s cleared it up.No, it's been done until the final. Saarbrücken, for example, were at home this season in every round to the semifinal (and eliminated Karlsruhe, Bayern München, Eintracht Frankfurft and Borussia Mönchengladbach) of the DFB-Pokal. But the rule doesn't occur for 2. Bundesliga teams - they can be drawn to teams from the 1. Bundesliga away.
Do the German thing of the lower placed team in the tie being given home advantage!
But then you'll never get to play at a higher league ground, even if you get to the 5th Round like Maidstone this year.
Let the lower team (if there is one) have the choice. Could actually be a force for good - have fans vote as to whether they take the cash and have a day out or have a better chance (but lower revenue) shot at a giant killing.can see both sides of this - yes, there's something about a 'big club' turning out at a non-league ground, but there's something about a non league team getting a chance to play at a 'big club' ground. (and if i understand right, the small club can do well financially out of an away tie at a ground that can hold more supporters)
which adds to the 'leave well alone' argument.
I think, you're right! In this case a replay would be a great idea, if the first leg ended in a draw.can see both sides of this - yes, there's something about a 'big club' turning out at a non-league ground, but there's something about a non league team getting a chance to play at a 'big club' ground. (and if i understand right, the small club can do well financially out of an away tie at a ground that can hold more supporters)
which adds to the 'leave well alone' argument.
Sounds par for the course. Jack Pearce's word is final, no need to consult anyone else.The National League Committee are opposing the Football Regulator and have supported scrapping FA Cup replays.it is being suggested they didn't bother to ask their member clubs opinion on thie matters.
Same old shambles. Hopefully a few clubs may reflect on this when the usual suspects on the Committee are up for re-election.
It's because of thisWhy is he walking towards the camera throughout that 75 seconds interview?
It's because of this
Sad to see the demise of another Non League Club with the news that New Salamis will cease operations at the end of the season. Remember them playing a Sunday Cup final at Champion Hill with a team that was pretty much a North London All Stars XI. Quite an atmosphere that day with fans drums, flares and god knows what else.
Never having had a suitable home ground of their own looks like a significant disadvantage to me. The county leagues (Steps 5 and 6) are now full of groundsharing clubs playing in front of tiny attendances, often flitting from one temporary home to another every couple of years. Other similar clubs have gone higher, with New Salamis and FC Romania reaching the Isthmian League, although the latter have since been relegated back to the county leagues.Sad news, as is the simultaneous demise of St Pantilemon who emerged about the same time. Being a community club and being in the pyramid is a tough balance.
That's got the National League chairman's fingerprints all over it. Settled with a funny handshake behind closed doors without member clubs having a say in the matter. Who really needs another cup competition? The games will be like playing Brentford in the London Senior Cup, but with a meaningless trophy at stake instead of one with a proud history. I assume all 16 of the National League representatives will be drawn from the top division, so what about the two thirds of member clubs in the North and South divisions?It now turns out the National League had arranged for 16 of their teams and 16 Premier League U21 sides to play in a new cup as a thank you for abolishing FA Cup Replays. Rumour has it, the Press Release was due to go last Saturday but was pulled. A member backlash?
It's only a couple of years ago that no club in the Kent County League met the ground grading criteria for promotion to Step 6, with Peckham Town being the closest but lacking floodlights. Since then at least 4 or 5 clubs have hooked up with sharing the grounds of existing NLS clubs in search of promotion, one of whom (Chipstead, who were lodgers at Sevenoaks Town) folded abruptly after only a handful of games this season, but where is the long term future in playing outside your own community at a ground already occupied by a bigger and more local club? You're just not going to build a fanbase or anything that can be sustained without relying upon some sort of external funding, and if that funding dries up for whatever reason, the whole club falls apart.
Harks back to when Farnborough Town, then under the ownership of Graham Westley, chose to concede home advantage to Arsenal in an FA Cup tie about 20 years ago. There was a lot of talk about “destroying the romance of the Cup” & opting for a half million pound payday especially with Westley involved though I believe it was a lot more complex than many portrayed. Believe the FA changed cup rules in the wake of that to ensure that only in exceptional circumstances could a club concede home advantage?Let the lower team (if there is one) have the choice. Could actually be a force for good - have fans vote as to whether they take the cash and have a day out or have a better chance (but lower revenue) shot at a giant killing.
Will never happen of course.