Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

General Election 2015 - chat, predictions, results and post election discussion

11181206_10152753538902217_6015006149174884386_n.jpg
 
I thought that 'Car&Wall' was 'Cornwall' being spelled in a regionalist accent :facepalm:
Well....actually that's not entirely unrelated. The 'wall' part of the place-name has the same (Anglo-Saxon imposed) derivation as does the 'Wal' in Wales, indicating that the location was one at which the invading Saxons came across a settlement of Britons. (originally "Waletone").

Although I'm a Jutish 'blow-in', I just wanted to point out the ancient British history of my adopted town. And Carshalton (orig. Aultone) has a very long history of habitation with an archeological record dating back to the neolithic.

Apols for off-thread ramble.:D
 
Miliband's allegation on Cameron and migrant deaths is shameful, says No 10
Downing Street says Labour leader should withdraw remarks that crisis in Mediterranean is direct result of failures in post-conflict planning for Libya

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...liband-allegation-cameron-libya-mediterranean


The Tories are livid about Milliband's attacks on Cameron over Libya, they claim he is partially blaming him for the catastrophe with the migrant boats. But the speech was more nuanced than that.

high stakes intervention by Ed here?

he was very impressive in his Chatham House speech on future labour foreign policy earlier.
 
Just had the greens leaflet through. Rob Reeves, a man with a beard. Did he not get the 'never trust a man with a beard' memo?

he doesn't look like he weaves yogurt while planning to sterilise the proleteriat but he's probably hiding that. Behind his beard.
 
Last edited:
I imagine both Cameron and Miliband would immediately get the boot. That Boris would step in is obvious for the Tories - Osborne et al would be tarred with Cameron's brush - but who would step in for Miliband?
 
I imagine both Cameron and Miliband would immediately get the boot. That Boris would step in is obvious for the Tories - Osborne et al would be tarred with Cameron's brush - but who would step in for Miliband?

Can you present any evidence or arguments to back up the numerous assertions in this post?
 
I imagine both Cameron and Miliband would immediately get the boot. That Boris would step in is obvious for the Tories - Osborne et al would be tarred with Cameron's brush - but who would step in for Miliband?
chukka will swoop in to save the day for labour and lead us all into the Glorious Day
 
Where does this view come from? He's not been particularly impressive thus far. Is it because of those daft Obama comparisons from a few years ago?
I wasn't serious- but hes photographic (or do I mean telegenic? one of them), articulate, labour faithful, on QT a lot. Not beyond the realms ever surely? that he'd be in a position to go for a leadership challenge some day?
 
I wasn't serious- but hes photographic, articulate, labour faithful, on QT a lot. Not beyond the realms ever surely? that he'd be in a position to go for a leadership challenge some day?
Leadership election takes months - no one swooping in or 'getting the boot' anytime soon.
 
I don't think Boris will pick up a leadership role until after he's quit being mayor, otherwise it'd be a bit of a piss take (not necessarily beyond him, but I think his current employers wouldn't look on it favourably).
 
He was quite pro PFI - he's opposition to the Health and Social Care Act has been more resolute than might have been feared, and he's done very well in that brief
I missed any pro-PFIness. If he hadn't opposed the H&SCA wholeheartedly then he'd have been a complete idiot. He does seem to have been reasonably competent at that, its true, which is something of a change, I suppose.
 
I missed any pro-PFIness. If he hadn't opposed the H&SCA wholeheartedly then he'd have been a complete idiot. He does seem to have been reasonably competent at that, its true, which is something of a change, I suppose.
He was pro-pfi in the way that pretty much all labour people 97-2010 were. I don't see where he's changed his tune since 2010 - he hasn't.

It's a daft claim on articul8's part to make it that his idea that Burnham was "a pretty trivial figure" in 2010 is still correct and that the worlds has actually changed around his correctness. Everything else changed.
 
Back
Top Bottom