Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

General Coronavirus (COVID-19) chat

Does anyone know why you can never get free kits off the gov website? There's never any available!
 
The last few times I've done a lateral flow test I had a bit of blood from swabbing my nose.
The results have been red line on the C and nothing on the T, so negative, not void.
So I've still got a clear result, but is the blood going to be interfering with the test?

(I'm not that worried about the blood, it's only a tiny bit)
 
Does anyone know why you can never get free kits off the gov website? There's never any available!
Best get them from your local authority through pharmacies, hubs, libraries etc
Hurry up though, you’ve only got a couple of weeks before you’ll have to buy them
 
The last few times I've done a lateral flow test I had a bit of blood from swabbing my nose.
The results have been red line on the C and nothing on the T, so negative, not void.
So I've still got a clear result, but is the blood going to be interfering with the test?

(I'm not that worried about the blood, it's only a tiny bit)
IIRC it says not to use if there is blood as could create a potential false negative.

Noticed last month that you can only order a pack every 3 days now whereas they were giving them in pair of packs at pharmacies a few month back.
Hoping that they have some nose only quick turnaround in stock again, but not holding my breath.
 
I know you're only supposed to use LFTs if you have no symptoms but I presume they will work if you have symptoms, too? So they've been using PCRs to test the actual virus genetic material because if you've got symptoms it's more likely you've got it?
 
Yeah the rules about which test to use were mostly to do with supply & demand and not overloading capacity, combined with some issues to do with accuracy of test/chance of false negatives.

The failure of UK authorities to expand the list of official Covid symptoms was also about testing capacity, workforce availability, probability of actually having covid vs another disease (eg using educated guesses to somewhat make up for lack of capacity).
 
tbf I did a few with nose blood on and never got a false positive, so only redo if you get a positive when blood was there.

With the last 3 LFT’s it was negative result & there was blood on the swab.

Not had a positive result yet. Or a void.

I’ll try again tomorrow morning, may as well.

( I don’t actually know if I can get a swab from my nose without blood on it at the mo…)
 
China reporting first deaths in a year or so, made me wonder if their reports of amazingly low numbers of infections throughout that have been widely taken as hard to believe or downright ridiculous despite the severe lockdowns might actually be true or near true figures.

I mean 2 years in and with social meeja an all, if the figures really were such a load of bollox then it would have been exposed by now
 
I'm back in the office for only the second time since March 2020. Felt a little less anxious about the train ride, now that mixing with strangers has become more normalised, and the office is virtually empty (5 people in a room with 30 desks). It's nice to be in a different environment for a change, and socialise a little bit (we're going out for some lunch together) but overall most people are feeling that it's really rather pointless to come in unless there's a specific reason to.

I miss being able to listen to my music on speakers though.
 
Got the train to Paris and then the south of France last week for first holiday overseas since this started, and have got a few local trains while here.

Everyone here wears a mask, and it's enforced with no visible complaints or kickback. In shops it's slightly lower, but not by much and I'd say about 90% of people wear one. Really stark difference with England.
 
Got the train to Paris and then the south of France last week for first holiday overseas since this started, and have got a few local trains while here.

Everyone here wears a mask, and it's enforced with no visible complaints or kickback. In shops it's slightly lower, but not by much and I'd say about 90% of people wear one. Really stark difference with England.
I found the same when in Ireland recently. I was taken aback compared to East London.
 
Got the train to Paris and then the south of France last week for first holiday overseas since this started, and have got a few local trains while here.

Everyone here wears a mask, and it's enforced with no visible complaints or kickback. In shops it's slightly lower, but not by much and I'd say about 90% of people wear one. Really stark difference with England.
It's still pretty much like that in Edinburgh.
 
The difference between Germany and France is as stark as the difference between France and the UK. Germany, absolutely everyone wearing FFP2 masks. Properly. France - plenty of UK style chin-masks, noses out, scraggy old cloth and paper masks.
 
Interesting short piece on the science around covid, and some scientists' entrenched positions. At the end I was thinking 'yes but what's your view?' but she does say in the last paragraph and it looks sensible.


This bit is revealing:

But instead of evolving their position based on new data, some, instead, keep trying to show how they were still right in early 2020, digging themselves an even deeper hole. A case in point is Stanford professor John Ioannidis, who, in March 2020, argued that governments were overreacting to the threat of Covid. He mocked those who worried that the “68 deaths from Covid-19 in the US as of 16 March will increase exponentially to 680, 6,800, 68,000, 680,000”. He estimated that the US might suffer only 10,000 deaths. He also was cynical that vaccines or treatments could be developed in any timeframe that would affect the trajectory of the pandemic.

Two years later, the current US death toll stands at 969,000, with almost 250,000 of those being people under 65. These numbers would have once been seen as outlandish. In addition, in less than a year we had developed safe and effective vaccines – and a year after that, safe and effective antivirals. One would expect these facts to prompt an academic to reconsider their initial assumptions – but instead, Ioannidis has continued to publish articles solidifying his starting position.

I also liked the 'test to treat' approach in America - you go to a pharmacy to get tested and if positive get free antivirals (although from the name I'd initially assumed you'd get tea and a cake :oops:).
 
Also see


and

 
So my Day 5 lft is still positive. Am I meant to report the test result or would it look like a new infection?
 
So my Day 5 lft is still positive. Am I meant to report the test result or would it look like a new infection?
I didn’t, I only reported my first positive LFT on the government site.

I reported some of the follow ups on my work system but that’s evidently just turned out to be pointless bureaucracy, given how nothing was triggered automatically by my first LFT.
 
Interesting short piece on the science around covid, and some scientists' entrenched positions. At the end I was thinking 'yes but what's your view?' but she does say in the last paragraph and it looks sensible.


This bit is revealing:



I also liked the 'test to treat' approach in America - you go to a pharmacy to get tested and if positive get free antivirals (although from the name I'd initially assumed you'd get tea and a cake :oops:).
Scientists are people and as subject to cognitive dissonance as anyone else I guess.

If anyone disagrees I shall argue the point for the next 146 pages ;)
 
Scientists are people and as subject to cognitive dissonance as anyone else I guess.

If anyone disagrees I shall argue the point for the next 146 pages ;)
But you'd hope that following scientific method would be some sort of inoculation against that.

Around 145.03 pages to go :)
 
Back
Top Bottom