Just ordered some for me and a friend today no problem, only a couple of hours before your post.Does anyone know why you can never get free kits off the gov website? There's never any available!
Best get them from your local authority through pharmacies, hubs, libraries etcDoes anyone know why you can never get free kits off the gov website? There's never any available!
IIRC it says not to use if there is blood as could create a potential false negative.The last few times I've done a lateral flow test I had a bit of blood from swabbing my nose.
The results have been red line on the C and nothing on the T, so negative, not void.
So I've still got a clear result, but is the blood going to be interfering with the test?
(I'm not that worried about the blood, it's only a tiny bit)
I know you're only supposed to use LFTs if you have no symptoms but I presume they will work if you have symptoms, too? So they've been using PCRs to test the actual virus genetic material because if you've got symptoms it's more likely you've got it?
tbf I did a few with nose blood on and never got a false positive, so only redo if you get a positive when blood was there.Damn. Better redo it.
tbf I did a few with nose blood on and never got a false positive, so only redo if you get a positive when blood was there.
Same for me in Morrison's y/day and it was very busy.As far as I could see, I was the only person in Aldi last night wearing a mask
I found the same when in Ireland recently. I was taken aback compared to East London.Got the train to Paris and then the south of France last week for first holiday overseas since this started, and have got a few local trains while here.
Everyone here wears a mask, and it's enforced with no visible complaints or kickback. In shops it's slightly lower, but not by much and I'd say about 90% of people wear one. Really stark difference with England.
It's still pretty much like that in Edinburgh.Got the train to Paris and then the south of France last week for first holiday overseas since this started, and have got a few local trains while here.
Everyone here wears a mask, and it's enforced with no visible complaints or kickback. In shops it's slightly lower, but not by much and I'd say about 90% of people wear one. Really stark difference with England.
But instead of evolving their position based on new data, some, instead, keep trying to show how they were still right in early 2020, digging themselves an even deeper hole. A case in point is Stanford professor John Ioannidis, who, in March 2020, argued that governments were overreacting to the threat of Covid. He mocked those who worried that the “68 deaths from Covid-19 in the US as of 16 March will increase exponentially to 680, 6,800, 68,000, 680,000”. He estimated that the US might suffer only 10,000 deaths. He also was cynical that vaccines or treatments could be developed in any timeframe that would affect the trajectory of the pandemic.
Two years later, the current US death toll stands at 969,000, with almost 250,000 of those being people under 65. These numbers would have once been seen as outlandish. In addition, in less than a year we had developed safe and effective vaccines – and a year after that, safe and effective antivirals. One would expect these facts to prompt an academic to reconsider their initial assumptions – but instead, Ioannidis has continued to publish articles solidifying his starting position.
I didn’t, I only reported my first positive LFT on the government site.So my Day 5 lft is still positive. Am I meant to report the test result or would it look like a new infection?
Scientists are people and as subject to cognitive dissonance as anyone else I guess.Interesting short piece on the science around covid, and some scientists' entrenched positions. At the end I was thinking 'yes but what's your view?' but she does say in the last paragraph and it looks sensible.
Why can’t some scientists just admit they were wrong about Covid? | Devi Sridhar
Our understanding of the virus has changed so much. Yet some doggedly cling to theories they proposed two years ago, says public health expert Devi Sridharwww.theguardian.com
This bit is revealing:
I also liked the 'test to treat' approach in America - you go to a pharmacy to get tested and if positive get free antivirals (although from the name I'd initially assumed you'd get tea and a cake ).
But you'd hope that following scientific method would be some sort of inoculation against that.Scientists are people and as subject to cognitive dissonance as anyone else I guess.
If anyone disagrees I shall argue the point for the next 146 pages
So my Day 5 lft is still positive. Am I meant to report the test result or would it look like a new infection?