Corax
Luke 5:16
Paki jokes - yes or no?this and this and this are ok if you don't agree there's something wrong with you; this however is out of order and there needs to be a law against it... uhuh...
Paki jokes - yes or no?this and this and this are ok if you don't agree there's something wrong with you; this however is out of order and there needs to be a law against it... uhuh...
are you suggesting that you might find humour in debasing children and that if we were to look at the comment in a serious light we might read into it more than was there originally only to then reveal something about how our own minds work rather than anything about you the person who made the comment...Well I find it funny because it is so disgusting, it's soo fucked up to be funny because it's in the realm of the absurd.
Making fun of a women simply cause you don't find her attractive disgusts me more because it's just a continuation of very real and very inane day to day cuntishness.
Oh stop spouting such drivel, that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.how can I give a full answer if the criteria for this group think exercise I have not had...
ignoring the stupid question is still an answer, it's just not one you or they like... if you cannot see the parallels then you're just stupid... which in your case... well let leave that there eh?
told by whom? I've already clarified this do keep up...Paki jokes - yes or no?
another fibtold by whom? I've already clarified this do keep up...
You implied that was irrelevant.told by whom?
are you suggesting that you might find humour in debasing children and that if we were to look at the comment in a serious light we might read into it more than was there originally only to then reveal something about how our own minds work rather than anything about you the person who made the comment...
either you understand this or you don't...
Talking of palestine and censorship, guess which poster on this thread had a hissy fit over and wanted to ban the use of the word 'philistine'?
I need to know where the unseen rules of appropriate humour are in order to assess whether this joke falls between them or not no?Oh stop spouting such drivel, that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Point to anywhere on this thread that anyone has called for Boyle to explicitly be censored. You do not any criteria for what makes a joke, you just need to know what 'censorship' means. Now, show us or shut up.
No, he and a host of other posters, are asking you to a) show where anyone has called for censorship of boyle on this thread and b) show where you have previously done so on this thread as you have claimed.I need to know where the unseen rules of appropriate humour are in order to assess whether this joke falls between them or not no?
you are asking for an absolutist statement is this acceptable or not. I'm saying that it's acceptable, it might not be palatable however to start a call out thread decrying a comic for their joke could be seen as well bullying by some. Moreover I've not said people are calling for him to be censored go back and read I've said that trying to apply a default criteria on humour is a form of censorship and in doing so you censor their work...
if you can't get what's being said I'm not here to teach you...
nope you're being deliberately obtuse as always ... it has no deeper level it's a joke... something which urban seems woefully short on getting these days...oh right so Franky Boyle was just being absurd, it was really working on a deeper level?
there are many comedians I'd accept that about Gervais or even Jimmy Carr, but like you said before Boyle isn't that snide, he's just a direct idiot.
I need to know where the unseen rules of appropriate humour are in order to assess whether this joke falls between them or not no?
you are asking for an absolutist statement is this acceptable or not. I'm saying that it's acceptable, it might not be palatable however to start a call out thread decrying a comic for their joke could be seen as well bullying by some. Moreover I've not said people are calling for him to be censored go back and read I've said that trying to apply a default criteria on humour is a form of censorship and in doing so you censor their work...
if you can't get what's being said I'm not here to teach you...
its very clear what is being said here. You cant justify your comments so are trying to obfuscate wildly. You can justify racism and sexism, but not your own comments!I need to know where the unseen rules of appropriate humour are in order to assess whether this joke falls between them or not no?
you are asking for an absolutist statement is this acceptable or not. I'm saying that it's acceptable, it might not be palatable however to start a call out thread decrying a comic for their joke could be seen as well bullying by some. Moreover I've not said people are calling for him to be censored go back and read I've said that trying to apply a default criteria on humour is a form of censorship and in doing so you censor their work...
if you can't get what's being said I'm not here to teach you...
No, he and a hoist of others, are asking you to a) show where anyone has called for censorship of boyle on this thread and b) show where you have previously done this on this thread as you have claimed. Now get to it.
More like this i fear:
Agai I have you're just not reading paxman light...Point out where anyone has called for censorship
No one is buying this you know.petty irrelevant point of no significance; but it's the only one you've got isn't it other than admitting that you and you're bestie have gotten rather irate about a joke making you look like the po faced fools you are...
Provide the criteria which we can judge the humour and then we can discuss whether that is acceptable a form to have jokes based around or not... otherwise starting a call out thread about a comics jokes you don't get or like is a cry for censorship: Look at this outrage... this is unbelievable... down with this sort of thing...
etc...
petty irrelevant point of no significance; but it's the only one you've got isn't it other than admitting that you and you're bestie have gotten rather irate about a joke making you look like the po faced fools you are...
Provide the criteria which we can judge the humour and then we can discuss whether that is acceptable a form to have jokes based around or not... otherwise starting a call out thread about a comics jokes you don't get or like is a cry for censorship: Look at this outrage... this is unbelievable... down with this sort of thing...
etc...
I'm saying she's shit and you're a lib-dem.are you belittling her because her jokes are crap, her delivery is crap, or shes a woman it's the later isn't it if it had been a man doubt it would even have been broadcast ... so it was publiscesd because she was a woman and then you're using it to illustrate poor humour ...
it's funny but you're the joke aren't you...
No you havent. You've even basically admitted you havent.Stop lying.Agai I have you're just not reading paxman light...
cool what is my background that you 'KNOW' then butchers really what exactly do you think you know about me...Peter Cook didn't go to eton. Knowing garf's background wouldn't surprise me if he did though.
I already have.cool what is my background that you 'KNOW' then butchers really what exactly do you think you know about me...
No you havent. You've even basically admitted you havent.Stop lying.
And point out where anyone has called for censorship.
Go on then, I'll ask: how is starting a thread with a comedians name in it a 'cry for censorship'? I can feel the answer is close - we don't know what it is yet, but the revelation will come!... otherwise starting a call out thread about a comics jokes you don't get or like is a cry for censorship: ..