This is spot on, and very well said by Pie (as usual):
Last edited:
Yes, that is precisely my point. The cocaine gives them an inflated sense of importance and the inability to shut the fuck up, plus added aggression via alcohol.
What would be your proposed alternative? Fight them? Drug their drinks? It's highly unlikely they can be re-educated and you don't strike me as a fighting person.So let them be racist shits as long as they're quiet racist shits. Just perpetuating the problem rather than actually doing something to solve it. Sweeping all the shit under the carpet.
Hard to tell, but I reckon plenty comes from racists abroad as well as racists at home.What do people make of the claim that some/a lot of the online abuse comes from other countries by the way?
I heard Southgate in his interview say that they knew because of IP addresses etc that a lot of the online abuse came from other countries. I've since seen a Tory commentator also argue this and some MI5 bod has said they don't think it's true.
I've been wondering because on the one hand it sounds a bit like the Remainers who say Russian bots made everyone vote for Brexit, but on the other hand far right and racist orgs do seem to be better organised in some countries than here and it doesn't seem inconceivable they would want to stoke racism.
Also, I'm not tech literate enough to know but assuming that online racists are fairly likely to use VPN's, how could you even tell where they are posting from?
That's ok,you don't strike me as a thinking personWhat would be your proposed alternative? Fight them? Drug their drinks? It's highly unlikely they can be re-educated and you don't strike me as a fighting person.
So, you think by igoring these racist hooligans and removing them from social media platforms and denying them access to football matches is perpetuating the problem?That's ok,you don't strike me as a thinking person
Yes, I think ignoring a problem doesn't solve it. Removing them from social media platforms doesn't solve it. Stopping them getting into football matches doesn't solve it. You are a great fan of out of sight out of mind. But racists are racists in communities, in workplaces, in schools and colleges and pubs and night clubs and on trains and buses etc. None of this means anything to you, I'm sure, as long as you don't see them.So, you think by igoring these racist hooligans and removing them from social media platforms and denying them access to football matches is perpetuating the problem?
I'm keen to hear what solutions beyond that you have in mind to "solve it". As I said, I doubt you are the street-fighting type.
Your analysis of football hooliganism is classist and simplistic, rooted in assumptions about the workshy and aggressive poor. If there's any truth to those assumptions (which is doubtful), they cannot be extended to cover online racist abuse, which is carried out for vastly different reasons than football violence.Yes, that is precisely my point. The cocaine gives them an inflated sense of importance and the inability to shut the fuck up, plus added aggression via alcohol.
Look we all know what these "lads" are about. They watched too many cheap football hoolie DVD's picked up from the local Esso garage on their way home from their dead end shitty jobs.
Films like "Football Factory" or "ID" or anything with that perennial bell-end Danny Dyer in it. They don't really even want to be "top boy" in their "firm" because that's too much work.
They want to feel the sense of "belonging" with the "lads" because they are incapable of opening up emotionally, so their ability to have successful relationships with women or any sorry children they manage to produce is scuppered. They are just damaged little men with fragile egos, and they invest whatever is swishing at the bottom of their emotionless husks into the idea of following the "lads" into "battle" over a sports game. It's the same all over the world. Little gangs of 7 year old kids in the playground of a primary school behave in the same way. You know this.
Of course you can pity these sad little boys all day, and refuse to invite them to nice things and refuse to introduce them to nice people.
You can reduce their influence on your life, and leave them to the inevitable lonely misery for which they are destined.
Comment about them on obscure websites. Avoid their England flag festooned white vans, and their beautician or "boss babe" women with their sluglike lips and orange flesh.
Watch as they actively drive a thriving trade in cocaine, which results in warfare between rival gangs eager to maintain the income from "DAZZA DA LEGEND" and his mates on match day.
Then watch as they post racist shit when some inner city kid is shot over an industry that they are directly fuelling.
And you'll be doing the same 40 years from now. We all know what they are. Cut them out of your life, and they will wither and vanish of their own accord.
It is important to document their behaviour, but as we see from Wembley security video, the police and security numbers for any football event involving the national team was less than half what is needs to be going forward. The coke binges or the spells in jail for domestic abuse or whatever they get up to will grind them into the ground.
Of course if Twitter and FB and all the others are keen to identify people for prosecution then we might be able to silence them more effectively. Not sure how keen I am on cancel culture but exposing people for what they are is only fair when they overstep the mark. It's 2021, it's very easy for people to go viral for some idiot comment posted somewhere. If you're still racially abusing people in 2021, expect to be doxxed, that then we can effectively silence them. Because that's all I want! Just to shut them the fuck up!
He is stupid and short-sighted. He will go far in the labour or Tory parties.Your analysis of football hooliganism is classist and simplistic, rooted in assumptions about the workshy and aggressive poor. If there's any truth to those assumptions (which is doubtful), they cannot be extended to cover online racist abuse, which is carried out for vastly different reasons than football violence.
So how has that worked out for you? Given that John Barnes is still seeing bananas chucked onto football pitches 40 years on from the famous picture of him in 1982.Yes, I think ignoring a problem doesn't solve it. Removing them from social media platforms doesn't solve it. Stopping them getting into football matches doesn't solve it. You are a great fan of out of sight out of mind. But racists are racists in communities, in workplaces, in schools and colleges and pubs and night clubs and on trains and buses etc. None of this means anything to you, I'm sure, as long as you don't see them.
But the best way to destroy an enemy is to turn them into a friend. You might thing re-education means chucking them into camps but appealling tho the thought may be, it wouldn't work like that. Some racists - not all obvs - are amenable to reason and that's how this is changed, not by Lewishams or Waterloos etc but by plugging away at racists and racism when you find them. Not all of this can be done pacifically of course. But promoting class politics not race politics. Yeh you won't change everyone's minds. But if you don't try, if you take your tack of censorship, you'll never change anyone's mind.
As I say you don't strike me as the thinking type
My analysis of this behaviour is rooted in growing up around it for decades. Of course it's simplistic. There is nothing complicated about getting rat arsed on Stella Artois and cheap coke to indulge in punch ups and "a good old sing song". It is a simplistic activity that only simpletons would enjoy.Your analysis of football hooliganism is classist and simplistic, rooted in assumptions about the workshy and aggressive poor. If there's any truth to those assumptions (which is doubtful), they cannot be extended to cover online racist abuse, which is carried out for vastly different reasons than football violence.
With every post your want of wit becomes clearer. I'm not a Marxist. I never said I was a Marxist. I haven't advocated bringing long-dead Italian Marxists up with anyone. Or even living labourites.So how has that worked out for you? Given that John Barnes is still seeing bananas chucked onto football pitches 40 years on from the famous picture of him in 1982.
I think your idea of enlightening bulldog-tattooed Chelsea fans with essays on Gramsci is very sweet, but sadly the idea of Marxism is more of a turn-off now than it has ever been to most working class people, who would rather vote for the tory party even against their own interests than entertain the idea of Corbyn and the like.
Doesn't seem to me you have much experience at all with working class people or their communities.
How would you propose introducing your "class politics" lessons to patrons of the Slaughtered Lamb or whatever, who love nothing better than getting pissed up and beating the shit out of left wing public school gobshites? Maybe put some Engels texts in their wraps of cheap cocaine?
So you really want them to be embittered auld racists and their children to be embittered young racists. How's that working out for you? Forty years of failure not enough to suggest your auld ways aren't working?Pickmans Model - "the best way to destroy an enemy is to turn them into a friend"
sorry but I don't want to be friends with people who spent half their lives making monkey chants or throwing bananas onto pitches.
I want to see them live worthless lives and suffer from their decisions to the point that they remove themselves from a society that does not need or want them.
So what you're really saying is there is an acceptable level of racism, as long as it's not online or at the footy you're quite happy to ignore it. Which is a really shitty attitude.My analysis of this behaviour is rooted in growing up around it for decades. Of course it's simplistic. There is nothing complicated about getting rat arsed on Stella Artois and cheap coke to indulge in punch ups and "a good old sing song". It is a simplistic activity that only simpletons would enjoy.
The racist abuse online is far more cowardly, and though it is carried out as a result of a football match not being won by those entitled enough to believe they deserve a victory, is swiftly prevented by doxxing those involved and making sure their employer is aware. There is no shortage of people who are ready to pay a visit to the online racist in person, once identified.
You have stated that your solution to the resurgence of ugly racism in football is to "educate them on class politics" which is as vague and as bemusing as it is comical.With every post your want of wit becomes clearer. I'm not a Marxist. I never said I was a Marxist. I haven't advocated bringing long-dead Italian Marxists up with anyone. Or even living labourites.
You'd run a mile from the Chelsea headhunters, given you just want them out of sight and mind. The last time I (with a load of other anti-fascists) met the headhunters they were notable for the speed of their retreat and the way they fought each other to escape onto their coaches.
But you won't change anyone's mind simply by giving them the occasional hiding. And you won't change anyone's mind as on your own evidence you're too craven to do anything about them yourself, you'd rather other people kept them out of football grounds and off social media.
In my opinion racism should be challenged whenever it becomes visible. You simply cannot stop the older generation from being racist. It's too late for them. They will die out, and their views will die with them. I am happy that anyone using the "N" word around black people should expect to be beaten severely and swiftly, be they male or female. There are legal mechanisms in place to prevent workplace discrimination, and given that the topic we are discussing is about football related racism, of course I'm only speaking of online and footy related racism. My attitude is not shitty at all, I've been challenging racist behaviour for as long as you have, perhaps even longer, but I am still trying to work out how you intend to re-educate these Stella swigging post-Brexit racist scumbags with "class politics".So what you're really saying is there is an acceptable level of racism, as long as it's not online or at the footy you're quite happy to ignore it. Which is a really shitty attitude.
I have been clear that talking to people isn't always going to work some posts back. I have said clearly that physical methods are needed too. I don't know if you've any actual history of anti-fascist or anti- racist activity, your posts tho suggest you haven't. I on the other hand do have, including at events like Waterloo. If you know anything about afa you'll know they espoused a twin- track approach which is as valid now as it was in the 90s, of a physical and a political approach. And that's what I'm suggesting, that where you can you challenge these views.You have stated that your solution to the resurgence of ugly racism in football is to "educate them on class politics" which is as vague and as bemusing as it is comical.
I would of course run more than a mile from Chelsea Headhunters, though the old "firms" of the 80's and 90's appear to be far less of a thing today.
I'm sure if I were amid groups of anti-fascists intent on countering the hooligan racists with violence, I would join in just as you claim to have done.
My opinion is really quite straightforward, the Blair government was as era where racism was dismissed as the nonsense of past backward thinking, as everyone was hugging each other in the stands and in the nightclubs after taking E.
Now the E culture has given way to the more insideous cocaine culture, we are seeing a return to the ugly stuff not seen as much since the worst days of Cyrille Regis.
It's interesting that you seem to believe you can change people's minds on "class politics" (as if these racist fools give a shit) yet you can't even debate this topic with me without the need to throw in insults and calling me "stupid and short-sighted".
Good luck trying to re-educate "DAZZA DA LEGEND" and his idiot flock. Maybe you could sell them cocaine cut with viagra and watch them try and fuck each other?
You would probably have more luck that way converting them into being more tolerant people if you give them the means to accept their frustrations regarding their sexuality or their inadequate sense of belonging. The reasons that these men (and it is always men) turn to violence and racial hatred are many, and your solution is really not going to make any headway.
Removing these people from influential positions, or their jobs, does work. Jim Davidson is a prime example. He had prime time TV shows espousing open racism, now he lives in Spain in a semen-stained dressing gown with no influence at all.
I haven't proposed to re-educate anyoneI am still trying to work out how you intend to re-educate these Stella swigging post-Brexit racist scumbags with "class politics".
You have had ample opportunities to explain how you propose to do this. Maybe try again?
Well you are wrong - I never mentioned poor people at all - that appears to be a projection of yours. There are as many well-heeled public schoolboy racists as there are working class. I never mentioned "workshy" at all, in fact I suggested that many of the cultural ideas were picked up from watching Danny Dyer DVDs after work.Your analysis of football hooliganism is classist and simplistic, rooted in assumptions about the workshy and aggressive poor. If there's any truth to those assumptions (which is doubtful), they cannot be extended to cover online racist abuse, which is carried out for vastly different reasons than football violence.
Well you did, by trying to say that re-education doesn't involve chucking people into camps.I haven't proposed to re-educate anyone
If you bother reading my posts instead of just looking at them you'll see I have said talking to people won't always work. Sometimes it will and those occasions should be taken advantage of, and other times someone will as you say be set in their ways and there's no point wasting your breath. There needs to be a diversity of tactics in opposing racism and as in any campaign some tactics will work in some situations and not in others.Well you did, by trying to say that re-education doesn't involve chucking people into camps.
"promoting class politics not race politics" seems to be your solution, alongside a good old fashioned kicking. I have no problem with the latter if that's what it takes, no pasaran and all that, but I fail to see how on Earth you would be able to promote class politics to "DAZZA DA LEGEND" and his coke-snorting cohorts.
I mean, I agree with your last sentence there (at least proportionately, in terms of absolute numbers there's probably less just cos of there being less public schoolboys overall). But:Well you are wrong - I never mentioned poor people at all - that appears to be a projection of yours. There are as many well-heeled public schoolboy racists as there are working class.
Were you talking about well-heeled public schoolboy racists picking up cheap DVDs from the local Esso garage on their way home from their dead end shitty jobs there?Look we all know what these "lads" are about. They watched too many cheap football hoolie DVD's picked up from the local Esso garage on their way home from their dead end shitty jobs.
Well I wasn't talking about poverty stricken communities sniffing £50 wraps of cocaine was I?I mean, I agree with your last sentence there (at least proportionately, in terms of absolute numbers there's probably less just cos of there being less public schoolboys overall). But:
Were you talking about well-heeled public schoolboy racists picking up cheap DVDs from the local Esso garage on their way home from their dead end shitty jobs there?
A diversity of tactics including reducing these racists to the sidelines by deleting their social media accounts, getting them sacked from their jobs, banning them from football matches and not including them in modern society whatsoever. Glad we agree. I happen to think promoting "class politics" to these idiots is like trying to teach algebra to a poodle, but I guess we all have our ambitions.If you bother reading my posts instead of just looking at them you'll see I have said talking to people won't always work. Sometimes it will and those occasions should be taken advantage of, and other times someone will as you say be set in their ways and there's no point wasting your breath. There needs to be a diversity of tactics in opposing racism and as in any campaign some tactics will work in some situations and not in others.
You may not have directly mentioned poor people but much of your post traffics in stereotypes about working class people. Some quotes:Well you are wrong - I never mentioned poor people at all - that appears to be a projection of yours.
So why does your post not mention them at all? It's quite disingenuous to claim that your posts are targeting 'well-heeled public schoolboy racists' when you're talking about white van men drinking Stella and doing cheap coke. It's classist dogwhistling all the way down.There are as many well-heeled public schoolboy racists as there are working class.
After working at their shitty dead end job they throw themselves into Danny Dyer films, because they can't be arsed to take on more responsibility in their firm because it's too much like hard work (in other words, they are workshy). In any case I disagree with the idea that hooligan media is a driver of this culture rather than merely a reflection of it.I never mentioned "workshy" at all, in fact I suggested that many of the cultural ideas were picked up from watching Danny Dyer DVDs after work.
I know there is a difference between football violence and racism within football. I said that in my first post. It was your post that linked racism to the same forces that you believe are behind football violence, when that view is just not borne out by reality as they are different phenomena driven by different factors.And there is a difference between football violence and racism within football. I know of several people from the West Ham hooligans of old that are decidedly anti-racist, and who are ashamed of their "lads" movements descending into embarrassing racist nonsense like the DFLA and Tommy Robinson worship.
Hopefully this post explains how I found a classist angle in your post.So I can't see a classist angle with anything I said, and as mentioned, I do see football hooligan culture as a whole being pretty simplistic, and appealing to simpletons.
Well you did, by trying to say that re-education doesn't involve chucking people into camps.
"promoting class politics not race politics" seems to be your solution, alongside a good old fashioned kicking. I have no problem with the latter if that's what it takes, no pasaran and all that, but I fail to see how on Earth you would be able to promote class politics to "DAZZA DA LEGEND" and his coke-snorting cohorts.
Well those obsessed with class will always find ways to see classism I suppose. The lager/cocaine "lads lads lads" culture is a culture I despise.I'm quite tired so this post will be pretty brief.
You may not have directly mentioned poor people but much of your post traffics in stereotypes about working class people. Some quotes:
'shitty dead end jobs'
'don't really even want to be "top boy" in their "firm" because that's too much work'
'England flag festooned white vans'
'beautician or "boss babe" women with their sluglike lips and orange flesh'
There's a picture being created here by the words that you use. And it's not a picture of an aspirational middle class existence. Hence my point that your post is rooted in assumptions about the workshy and aggressive poor.
So why does your post not mention them at all? It's quite disingenuous to claim that your posts are targeting 'well-heeled public schoolboy racists' when you're talking about white van men drinking Stella and doing cheap coke. It's classist dogwhistling all the way down.
After working at their shitty dead end job they throw themselves into Danny Dyer films, because they can't be arsed to take on more responsibility in their firm because it's too much like hard work (in other words, they are workshy). In any case I disagree with the idea that hooligan media is a driver of this culture rather than merely a reflection of it.
I know there is a difference between football violence and racism within football. I said that in my first post. It was your post that linked racism to the same forces that you believe are behind football violence, when that view is just not borne out by reality as they are different phenomena driven by different factors.
Hopefully this post explains how I found a classist angle in your post.
Well those obsessed with class will always find ways to see classism I suppose. The lager/cocaine "lads lads lads" culture is a culture I despise.
I stand by every word I said because it's true and observable. I don't think it's a class thing, it's more a cultural thing. In the same way public schoolboys will have pictures of 2Pac and start speaking with an urban accent and call each other "bruv" and "fam", nothing to do with class, more to do with clinging on to an identity because cultivating a personality is too much like hard work.
The only subtle error in your interpretation is that of the "can't be arsed to take on more responsibility in their firm because it's too much like hard work" which is less to do with being workshy and more to do with being a coward, they would rather hover in the sidelines than stand as leaders.